<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Declaring Independents &#187; Corporations</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?cat=18&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>View From the Terrible Tower</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=1179</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=1179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schoch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repubilcans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=1179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By: DI Editor, Dusty Schoch June 26, 2012 With the political poles chattering and crucial elections looming I am writing to sound the alarm of potential pending doom and disaster &#8212; A disaster which will come full circle if we &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=1179">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=1179" data-text="View From the Terrible Tower" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D1179&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><p align="center"><a href="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/tower-of-babel-19-jun-091.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1180" title="tower-of-babel-19-jun-091" src="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/tower-of-babel-19-jun-091-219x300.jpg" alt="" width="219" height="300" /></a></p>
<p align="center">By: DI Editor, Dusty Schoch</p>
<p align="center">June 26, 2012</p>
<p>With the political poles chattering and crucial elections looming I am writing to sound the alarm of potential pending doom and disaster &#8212; A disaster which will come full circle if we again elect the wrong president (Sorry, we didn’t actually elect Bush; he was crowned king by fiat of the Supremes chorusing in 5/4 Republican harmony to corporate sponsors in the Con law case of Gore v Bush).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But to what “tower” do I refer?  It’s the terrible tyrannical tower which will determine whether we respond to disaster with a plea for deliverance or …  greater disaster.  I promise you – errant government is not like wild fires; electing more nitwitted neocons to “back-fire”&#8211;fix the disasters of former neocons won’t work. Now back to the tower: Don’t sneak-peak  the end of my essay – I buried my lead for a good cause:  I want to take you on a stroll through American History before pointing you to the tower where America’s history and fate will be determined.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This essay was provoked by today’s headlines showing Obama and Romney presently running even in the polls. The article rang true when it said that polls are often misleading because (as Dukakis in 1988) 9<sup>th</sup>-inning flukes and other things often reverse the tides of presidential elections. The op/ed writer today said that next to “flukes”, campaign contributions today are the prime determinant of election outcome.  I agree and because of that am sounding this alarm that all beware of the sinister and potentially catastrophic co-workings of (1) the money (campaign contributions) and (2) what “the terrible tower” does with the money.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>History lessons abound with caveats we’ve ignored and have gotten us Americans to the brink of national industrial, moral and financial bankruptcy.  People want to blame Obama for heading the glue crew that’s failed to put Humpty Dumpty (Uncle Sam) back together and on global Wall Street.  Most voters (and all Republican voters) are blind to the fact that Bush converted America from a beloved defender to a loathed aggressor nation, and while his corporate consorts were exporting America’s industry to China, his military subordinates were exporting our cash reserves (and the wealth of our grandchildren) to the Middle East to secure corporate control of diminishing oil reserves.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But the whole world knows that. The question is why (polls indicate) half of America is not SORELY aware of this…to the extent that 50 percent of us are presently undecided as to whether we’ll put America back in the hands of another corporate-controlled Republican imperialist.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Relevant history lessons include 3 modern and one ancient philosopher/writers and…prophets (predictors of American and world evolution).  The three—generally contemporary&#8211;modern thinkers I write of are George Orwell (author of <strong><em>Nineteen Eighty Four</em></strong>),  Aldous Huxley (<strong><em>Brave New World</em></strong>), Marshall McLuhan <strong><em>(“Understanding Media”</em></strong>). The ancient author, who wrote about “the tower” is, I believe, the one who got it “all right”, and is, therefore the one we need to study more closely and …. before the next election….heed, in order to rescue ourselves from pending disaster.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Long stories short – Orwell (English) in his “1984” warned us that there would come a day when the governments of our nation states would have seized sufficient power to become absolutely corrupt and despotic, and that as a result, all individuality and personal freedoms would be extinguished by the “Big Brother” rulers’ “Big Lies” and myriad forms of mind control designed to stifle our treasured individualized selves.  This really hasn’t happened, at least as Orwell envisioned.  Perhaps Huxley came closer to our evolved reality as he presaged a time when industrialization would transport America into an era where capitalistic/materialistic and pleasure-seeking people would become so narcissistically wrapped up in achieving fame, fun and fungibles that they would entirely lose sight of and empathy with anything outside their accreting fortunes and egos…like their environment or the rights of others (creatures and countries) to remain free and viable.   Looking to my right and my left today, I see no one screaming in protest that we have in the past ten years criminally invaded and occupied two sovereign foreign countries. Four of eight Americans today know who the Kardashians are (commercially-synthesized cyborg celebrities)  but have no idea how many hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals we have killed in the past decade (FYI, over a half million!).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Among the modern thinkers, I believe Marshall McLuhan takes the prize for predicting how a cabal of corporate bullies managed to machinate our national devolution from defender nation to international bully, and from prosperous democracy to impoverished corporate plutonomy.  Corporations clearly run all the shows that the American people now watch. Corporations have now acquired such plenary—absolutely corrupting power—that they’ve enabled presidents  to so sack and stack a Supreme Court bench that the Court has redefined Corporations as “people”…American citizens, having the right to elect leaders by direct means of money and might…because they can take their money and control our media.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As Orwell warned us in 1984, the corporate-sponsored (thereby controlled) media tell us big lies so often and so loudly that the majority of us can no longer see the truth….because as Huxley predicted (of America), our hedonism and self-servicing narcissism would one day make of independently-reasoning men, media-malleable sheep. Sheep stupid enough to believe bin Laden was an agent of Saddam Hussein; Sheep stupid enough to believe Saddam had anything to do with 9/11.   Sheep stupid enough to believe that Obama was born in Kenya. Stupid enough to believe America’s financial meltdown is the fault of the president who inherited the White House after Bush  sold it to Halliburton and China.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Before I point to the tower…and the tale of truth that could actually save us&#8211;if anything can&#8211; with its wise and prophetic view of where America stands teetering today….I’ll write a little more about the money part of the present disaster…the powerful money that has resulted in the fulfillment of Marshall McLuhan’s prophesy that one day in America and the world the MEDIA WILL BECOME THE MESSAGE.  Today, it is estimated that over three billion dollars will be raised by the corporate and fat-cat superpaks to control America’s perception of—and votes for&#8211;the men running for public office. THINK ABOUT THAT FIGURE!  Dividing 3 billion by America’s population shows that, on Television and Radio, corporations and fat cats will spend enough money that otherwise could drop $1,000 into the pockets of each and every living American, and $3,000 into the saving accounts of the average American family.  But instead, under the new corporate-lobbied laws, that $1,000 per citizen fortune will be dedicated to molding American opinion in tune with the agendas (e.g. Romney is smart. “Fracking is safe.”) corporations are marketing to us on commercial media ads.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Well, isn’t that what Orwell, Huxley and&#8211;more specifically&#8211;McLuhan were all warning us about…big lies…propaganda…molding our thinking to the eventual point the media has become the message? Yes, yes and  yes. But now I’ll reveal how: Now I’ll point to the<br />
“terrible tower” …and the infinitely-prescient writer who envisioned it and whose identity must remain anonymous.  The precursor to our terrible tower was named Babel. Open your Bibles to Genesis 11 but don’t think Judeo-Christian  or Mosaic prophesy….Just think…human history and sage prophesy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Warning to you the reader (and me the writer):  The odious  and inadvertently-evil builders of the terrible tower I have in sight and mind today were mostly innocent…just like the ambitious architects and builders of the Biblical Tower of Babel.  While those ancient builders were so busy trying to project their stones, mortar and influence into heavenly realms where, logically and ecologically no being without feathers belongs, they had their minds so much on their “selves”, they lost sight of—and touch with&#8211; one another…and their shared planet.   When they got to the sky-scraping floors, they suddenly realized that they had lost the ability to communicate with one another. The only thing they had in common was the arrogant edifice they were building, and without concern for one another, the tower was just that—an arrogant sty in the eye of heaven.   In the ancient parable, man’s Creator made it impossible for him to speak to his fellow humans…and as a result, the tower came crumbling down to earth, as did America under George Bush.  Unfortunately you can’t keep a bad thing down. The tower, I am loathe to report, has…risen! Sadly and to our detriment, its present embodiment is more terrible than ever.   Under the shadowy influence of that terrible tower, people in America and the rest of the world are in regards to one another, becoming babbling idiots.  Even the 100 sectors of America’s Wall Street Revolution have no unifying mantra or agenda.  We are all speaking as with different tongues, and as a result are heading towards cultural, political, ecological and economic Armageddon.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here’s the buried lead…finally.  What is today’s “terrible tower”? It is a tower that never existed in the days of Lincoln and Jefferson or even the Roosevelts.   These leaders were elected because we met and came to know them on the covers and in the coverage of newspapers and on the parchments posted in our city squares, right there in the hearts of our cities, at sea level where we belong…together.  In these papers and parchments were published the words of non-partisan journalists whom we had, through time and testing, grown to trust, as purveyors, distillers and disseminators of political truths. Today we sit at home and stare at images delivered to us now serially at light speed in a language Orwell termed “double speak” (truth and falsity in the same statement) in which it is impossible for us to discern truth from lies. The messages are all partisan “newspeak” and emanate from one party or another, all according to either the corporate fat-cat (Republican, a.k.a. “conservative”) or the working class Democrat (a.k.a. “liberal”) agendas.  The very idea of adversity between the parties is itself a double-speak lie, because in today’s reality, both Republicans and Democrats are merely corporate proxies. If you are a free-thinking independent such as I, your thoughts in transit in this media are labeled “liberal”.   We stare at these messages from the sinister towers empowering our televisions, our Ipods, our “virally-spreading” e-mails from god/knows/who/or/where and most recently our Twittering, FaceBook and YouTubing friends who for the most part are really not our friends, but really just others who make—and take&#8211;little vampire-lie  “bytes” of us while the only thing we have in common is our watching and ….obeying (by “forwarding”)… signals from the same …terrible tower.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The terrible tower to and about which I refer and rant is the broadcasting tower,  my friends—the instantly-gratifying Babeling Tower that today can make a mental mouse’s message roar like a prophetic lion’s. Any little agoraphobic nerd on the planet can now, with a little effort and skill with computer technology, launch any lie he can conjure up into the orbital clouds of cyberspace and “go viral” with any lascivious thing he wants to say about the sitting president of the United States. Corporations can now invest billions of dollars directly in TV ads designed to stream half-truths and out-of-context lies before our eyes on a 24/365 basis until a sizable number of us are Tea-party tricked into viewing a native-born American president, who was previously president of Harvard Law Review, as a Kenyan-born Islamic terrorist.<br />
This is insanity.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Brimmond_Hill_radio_tower_Aberdeen_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_41325.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1182" title="Brimmond_Hill_radio_tower_(Aberdeen)_-_geograph.org.uk_-_41325" src="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Brimmond_Hill_radio_tower_Aberdeen_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_41325-217x300.jpg" alt="" width="217" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>So what makes the media broadcasting tower of today more “terrible” than the tower in the time of ancient Babel?  It’s the difference between ignorance and arrogance.  It took the Babel Tower builders a lot of time and talent to build a stone and mortar structure sky-scraping tall way back then; so, apart from the egoistic arrogance and environmental insult, the tower of ancient Babel was offensive mainly to diety and comparatively innocuous within its own cultural context. The media broadcast towers of today, on the latter hand are, functionally, arrogance compounded by ignorance.  Just as bottom-line dollars sustain the soulless cyborg vivacity of corporations today that will continue fracking our water and air, warming the planet,  MSG/ing and transfatting our food and arteries so long as their stock manages to accrete  dollars on Wall Street,  the terrible towers of broadcast media will continue to telegraph, cell-phone, e-mail, radio, televise, twitter and satellite bounce, blog and otherwise transmit to every corner of the universe any ignorant nonsense and lie contrived by anyone living or dubbed “human” by Supreme Court edict so long as said imbecilic cyborg has the  dollars to purchase the “air time”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If a candidate for elective office in Lincoln’s day received either criticism or praise in the media, the source of that information bore the authenticity associated with a journalist who had established his literary prowess and journalistic skills by earning his position on the staff of a trusted periodical journal. Moreover, maintaining one’s position as a journalist required rigorous adherence to extraordinarily high ethical standards imposed by traditional (old-school) journalistic institutions.  Today, if NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman makes a mistake, you can bet your life it was not the product of ignorance, partisan bias or dollar-driven allegiance to some corporate patron. By contrast, if you hear or view something from the tower of an oxymoronically-named “Fox News” broadcast, you can bet your life it is all three. Fox News is the arch villain in the terrible media tower, for the universally-known reason that its founder, Rupert Murdoch—just for the bucks—has with greed and mendacity aforethought, intentionally skewed (demolished) the line between “opining” and “news reporting” in broadcast journalism. It is doubtful that people regularly watching “Fox Media” programming will ever again be capable of recognizing the difference. Murdoch has proved to the world that wholly dollar-driven and unscrupulous utilization of the terrible tower can and does enable arrogance to beget ignorance. We can only hope that this maniacal media mogul’s recent scandal (with phone tapping) will begin the easing and eventually the loss of his 60-billion dollar grip on the broadcast media which—more than any other on earth—accounts for the terrible in the broadcast tower.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>My ultimate warning is this: In your search for  “truth” in news and politics, try this:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>(1)   Turn off your  T.V., radio and  Ipod/Phone. If it’s digital it’s dubious.    Stanch the artesian flood of fabricated falsities in your tower-tainted emails. Delete&#8211;don’t “forward” them. If you receive a “conservative” forward in the e-mail, run their key words through the Urban Legends gauntlet (Snopes.com) and discover how many of them are total fabrications.</p>
<p>(2)   Form your own thoughts and tell them, phone them,  email them to your friends. You can Google just about any reliable newspaper articles in the world now. If you want to know who owns the newspapers or broadcast systems you are auditing, all this information is available on Wikipedia. And yes—despite what Fox News says—Wikipedia is the most accessible and reliable source of current information on earth. Wiki invites us all to police their truth and amend their mistakes. Donate to Wiki and Public Radio; they belong to you.</p>
<p>(3)  Go down to your town squares, attend public meetings and talk to one another eye-to-eye about what you have learned in the still-reliable mainstream media by which we elected Lincoln, Jefferson, Washington, and Roosevelt(s).   That would include non-partisan journals like the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, the still free (not corporate controlled) Public Radio stations, the occasional network TV broadcasts of candidates’ debates which cost the candidates nothing, and last but not least, the people and media institutions (including blogs) you personally know and trust, including your good old High Point Enterprise and yours (always) truly.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Dusty Schoch</p>
<p>June 25, 2012       <a href="http://www.DeclaringIndependents.com">www.DeclaringIndependents.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1179</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OWS&#8217; Manual of Revolutionary Arms</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=985</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=985#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schoch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Occupy the World” Revolution—And Solution   “2011 A Space Odyssey”   Putting a Face on the Crowds   And a Face on the Monster Stalking the Crowds THE CAUSE AND SOLUTION (FORMULA) TO THE WORLD’S CURRENT CRISIS (REVOLUTION)     &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=985">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=985" data-text="OWS&#8217; Manual of Revolutionary Arms" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D985&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">“Occupy the World” Revolution—And Solution</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">“2011 A Space Odyssey”</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Putting a Face on the Crowds</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">And a Face on the Monster Stalking the Crowds</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>THE CAUSE AND SOLUTION (FORMULA) TO THE WORLD’S CURRENT CRISIS (REVOLUTION)</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">OWS VICTORY FORMULA:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">OWS</span></strong><strong><sup><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">40</span></sup></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">/C=RCA</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Your challenge (as you read): </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>You already know “OWS” = “Occupy Wall Street”.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>The solution (proof) of the formula comes at the</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>end (don’t cheat and peak). </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>Challenge yourself to figure out…</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>what the “40” stands for…</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>what the two “C’s” , the “R” and “A” stand for…</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> knowing that this is in fact a formula for “victory”. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">There’s a revolution under way</span></strong>, people, and it’s a world-wide revolution. The fearful conservatives (wealthy) in our midst (in our Fox Media faces) will tell you that the Wall Street “occupiers” have no “cause” they can articulate, and the same thing can be said of what is happening now in Greece, Rome, London, Taiwan, and pretty much everywhere around the globe newly wired by cell phones, IPODs, Twitter, Facebook and “The Cloud”.  The working classes of the world have finally united&#8211;at least temporally&#8211;and what is at stake is  cataclysmically important: The world’s economy could easily collapse under the combined factors of a global economic recession bordering on depression and an electronically-hyper-connected mass protest reacting to that collapse and demanding redress (and retribution) from those variously perceived as “causes” of that collapse.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;"> So here it is: The <span style="text-decoration: underline;">cause</span> and the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">solution</span> to the world’s current crisis:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Without the unifying power of a common cause, any revolution we begin is doomed to failure.</strong> <strong>Now you have an inkling of why I am writing. When I suggest “we” need to unite this revolution, I mean “we” in the  GLOBAL SENSE—because like it or no, the Wikileaked, Twittered, I-phoned, in-the-cloud planet of ours is now truly “ a single creature, clinging to the round warm stone, turning in the sun.” (Thanks for the gaia image, Lewis Thomas). </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">With the Thomas allusion, I’ll here lay some more (sorry) complex philosophical groundwork<strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">. I want you to understand the word, “Gaia”</span></strong>&#8211;what it means and why it is so important. It is what Lewis Thomas was referring to when he characterized our planet as being what it is in the macrocosmic sense—a single creature.  What we are ecologically we are economically. In the Gaia Principle sense, we are “one” with the trees and seas. We breathe out carbon dioxide and they (the trees and sea) breathe it in. The trees in turn (through chlorophyll and algae) breathe out the oxygen which every second keeps us animated creatures alive. As thanks for this symbiotic salvation, we (humans) clear-cut forests of trees and dump our toxic and plastic garbage into maternal oceans, but that’s collateral story and another travesty to deal with later. But the revolution of which I write today and our cutting of trees and pollution of seas have a single common denominator.  Stay with me.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">The point in the preceding paragraph is that we can’t affect one part of an ecosystem without affecting the whole, because the world’s ecosystem is just that&#8211; a single, interdependent system. Humans have, as a single “tissue” in the world’s unitary Gaia body, become like a cancer…through overpopulation, recently topping 7 Billion.  If we were only a few million we could all drive SUV’s that get 6 miles a gallon and live in 20,000-square foot AC’d houses without killing the ozone or frying the planet. Change those millions to 7 billion, and we have changed the world’s smartest species into a virtual malignancy on the body of the unitary Gaia creature, which may be the only creature of its kind in the universe.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">So what’s the relevance of the “Gaia” principle to the global protests&#8212;and burgeoning revolution—now going on literally all over the Gaia globe….?   It’s the SAME THING. That is: What we are doing to our planet by over populating and polluting it, is being done to us humans &#8212;and the planet&#8211;by another over-grown monster in the same eco-logical and eco-nomical macrocosm.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">We need both a familiar and purposeful face for the crowd and a “make” on the monster stalking—and being stalked (albeit knowingly or inadvertently) by that crowd. I say we start by seeking the face of the monster, because it is with that monster that everyone in those crowds is attempting to contend.  <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">It is the monster that is the seminal cause of all the only superficially-severable things they are protesting.</span></strong>  All the things of which they complain….from “no jobs” to burst real estate and stock bubbles and bailouts…are “different”—<strong>BUT</strong> <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">THEY ARE ALL THE WORK OF A SINGLE MONSTER.  AND THE NAME OF THE MONSTER IS…………..</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong><strong><span style="font-family: 'Britannic Bold'; font-size: 20.0pt;">CORPORATION</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">HERE’S WHAT WE ALL KNOW: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">CORPORATIONS . . .  </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">. . . Out of Greed and the Need “To Survive” in the global economy….</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Own/are the banks and mortgage brokerages that inflated the housing bubble, then popped it, then got bailed out while Americans got tossed out in foreclosures and bankruptcies. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Systematically exported (“downsized” their own labor forces and “off-shored”) America’s laboring and middle-class jobs to China and other</span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">third-world slave-labor camps.  Adding insult to injury&#8211;The largest corporation in America—i.e., the one employing the most Americans, is Walmart.  Walmart is a sales agent and distributorship for Communist China, our most formidable and dedicated adversary in the world. Corporate off-shoring has placed America’s destiny in the hands of Communist China.  </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -.5in;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">    </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Bush-wacked (pun intended)  America’s healthcare system by buying up control of all the healthcare providers and their addictively co-dependent insurance providers : Doctors now work for corporate HMO’s instead of themselves and physicians are now converted from professional caring healers to assembly-line cyborgs allotted 3 to 10 minutes per patient, destroying physician-patient relationships and excluding all from treatment save those who either work for corporations and have corporate-funded health insurance or who own corporations and don’t need it. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Own/are the pharmaceutical companies manufacturing the meds the majority of Americans are physically and/or mentally addicted to and can’t afford. The game they are playing and winning is “don’t make people well—make them addicted and pay.”  These are the wealthiest and most powerful corporations on the planet. They make the policy that doctors, the FDA and we—the addicted—follow, pay and often die for (by either taking it or not being able to afford taking it).  </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Own/are the petroleum and coal energy-producing companies which, in order to keep their obscene profits rolling in, have managed to convince forty percent of America (as opposed to 10 percent of the rest of the world) that global warming is a myth, fracking is safe,  and that seeking sustainable energy sources and going green to save the planet is un-American, in spite of BP’s recent rape of our American Gulf. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Own/are the munitions companies that profit—perennially—from the wars they lobby to launch, supply and perpetuate. They do it for oil; they do it for munitions profits; they do it for mercenary soldier profits, and they’ll do it forever until they are stopped.  Without Halliburton there would have been no Cheney; without Cheney there would have been no wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.  The world (outside America) already knows this, and history will confirm it. So far, over a half million non-militants have perished in these two wars, and counting. Corporate PR-coached Congressmen call it “collateral damage”.  When other countries do it, the same foxy word spinners call it “terrorism”. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">American terrorism abroad is known as terrorism. Domestically it is PR packaged,  “shock and awe”.  Corporate-funded “institutes” spin these</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Orwellian distortions of truth (1984’s “Big Lies”). </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Elect freely both presidents and Congressmen through control of the media (not to mention the one they elected through control of the Supreme Court) and the newly-acquired right to campaign directly in presidential and Congressional elections without any restrictions on dollars spent on the TV and media commercials that clearly determine who wins elections.  </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Through lobbyists and control of Congress create laws that tax themselves at 35 percent but at the same time provide “loopholes” that exempt the most powerful and profitable corporations from paying any income tax.  [The COLLOSSAL and catastrophic irony of this should</span></strong>be viewed in the context of  tax  history: Alexander Hamilton, observing a naturally stronger France be overtaken and passed—militarily and industrially&#8211; by a smaller but fiscally-responsible England, taught us that a nation can be no more successful than its fiscal policies are responsible. Financially, he taught us the axiom that a nation must maintain its financial credit and that taxing its citizenry is the only means of accomplishing that.  <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Whereas our country was founded on the revolution of “<span style="text-decoration: underline;">no taxation without representation</span>”, the current OWS revolution is largely the result of the opposite&#8212; The financial giants among us (corporations) are demanding&#8212;and getting&#8211;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">representation without taxation.</span>  The catastrophic result of this is corporations have converted America from the world’s strongest economy to the world’s greatest debtor nation…and our credit is now being questioned. When the answer to the question becomes “no”, the U.S. as a leader nation is history. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Appoint freely and thereby control the U.S. Supreme Court whose decisions are now routinely 5-4 fiats dictated by corporate-controlled GOP-voting pseudo-jurists—the same jurists who in the past 4 years granted corporations the right to take your personal property and to insure the election of its chosen candidates for Congress through removing any restrictions on independently campaigning (disguised as “free speech”). </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Work together so all corporate-controlled banks, securities brokers (money lenders of all varieties) and Chinese sales representatives are viewed as “too big to fall”, so that tax-payer funded “bailouts” provide a failsafe means of perpetuating their already absolute power over us and our government and push our country further towards the brink of collapse through loss of creditability. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">THE FALLOUT FROM CORPORATE CORRUPTION:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">All of the foregoing areas of unrestrained corporate power are leading to soaring unemployment, inflation, resource exhaustion, poverty, sickness, homelessness, bankruptcy, crime, insipient depression and the financial collapse of American and other formerly-thriving nations about the world and yet the corporate plutocrats are still thriving and  able to host tea parties and convince a simple but sizeable sector of unemployed, uninsured desperate people that taxing or otherwise inhibiting anything corporations are doing amounts to treason because corporations are now so powerful that they are able to peddle propaganda as  patriotism, proving  that Orwell’s 1984 story of Big Brother corporations one day running the world by propagation of the “Big Lies” was more prophesy than mythology—more future shocking  fact than fiction. </span></strong></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">THE PAST WAS PRELUDE: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Corporate founders were made pariah and hated at the surge and ebbing of America’s first Depression—the Great One.</strong>  Rockefeller Center was built as a guilt offering by former “robber barons” of American greed. When the stock market crashed then and people were ruined, it was fleetingly recognized that a monster had arisen in our midst and we had obliviously bought into the monster, fed and nurtured it until it reared its ugly head and ate up the figments of our economic imaginations, effectively putting an abrupt end to the American Dream—at least for its working class. Back then, the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil entity was technically a “trust” rather than a corporation, but its cyborg essence and power were the same. <strong>The public outrage at the soulless greed of the monster trusts led to the splitting up of those judicially-deemed “monopolies”, but if the limbs of the monopolistic plants were trimmed, they were certainly not plowed under. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Unfortunately, the seeds of that economically tyrannic institution were not destroyed—but rather morphed into even more monstrous, ubiquitous and even less human entities called corporations. </span></strong>During America’s “recovery period”, these new hybrid legal “beings” were widely planted and permitted to thrive in a new economic environment where their survival was secured by another creation we simultaneously devised to insure that our corporate banks and securities-based economy could never again fall—a Federal Reserve “Bank” that—when the real value-based money ran out—was authorized to counterfeit money and thus enable the poor old failures of today to be bailed out by the poor indentured youth of tomorrow…. And yes—absolutely—I am saying to you that corrupt and morally-bankrupt financial “bailouts” are nothing new on the American scene. And what I am saying further is that the monster that brought America to its knees in the Great Depression is the same monster stalking—and being stalked by&#8211;every single one of those who are separately chanting protests about only seemingly-different things in the city squares of the world, right now.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">If Corporations are “the problem”, then should the goal of the OWS Revolution be to eliminate corporations?  Clearly not.  Corporations still employ us, produce and provide us pretty much everything from gasoline to entertainment, and even manage the HMO’s and pharmaceutical companies that provide our personal physicians and pills. So, if we can’t reverse history and get “rid” of them, what should we—in revolutionary fashion—do?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">As is often the case in human history, the answer is evident in the work of an American artist: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">An artist who painted for us a portentous portrait of the face of this   monster—and the hero who “took him down” was a movie maker named Stanley Kubrick.  His “2001 A Space Odyssey” is being literally reprised in the reality now before us as “2011, A Space Odyssey”.   The monster is the same, by analogy.  Kubrick’s mythical computer (nicknamed “Hal”) &#8212; gone wild&#8212;was to story’s space ship (“Discovery One”) and mission (“Odyssey” to Jupiter) exactly what the corporation has become to America and its destiny. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">In the Kubrick movie, we were given a prodigious parable that could save us today—the story of “Hal”</span></strong> – a computer amazingly programmed and supplied with the entire extant knowledge and hyper-driven intelligence of its human creators, and ceded thereafter complete control and steerage of its Jupiter-bound spaceship.  A solid-circuited-silicone-chipped machine-turned-monster and destroyer of both their shared spaceship and mission.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Where are the analogy and lesson?  Hal—the Odyssey’s spaceship’s (“Discovery One”) on-board computer was functionally for that mission and spaceship exactly the same as the American corporation is to America’s ship of state (our nation and our earth). Hal did literally everything for the spaceship’s crew and mission, from preparing their food to plotting their trek through space. Moreover, both Hal and the Corporation became monstrous for the same reason, and with the same effect.  That being the case, the solution –the remedy for Keir Dullea (Captain of Discovery One) and for our present-day revolutionary “occupiers” of Wall Street and other financial capitals of the Gaia-united globe&#8212;is the same</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">What went wrong in the creation of mythical  Hal went (really) wrong when we permitted our lawyers and our governments to create the first monstrous corporation.  The thing that is “wrong” with both is that they are both “cyborgs” and cyborgs built to accrete (rather than distribute) wealth and power. </span></strong> That’s (“cyborg”) the other term (the prior being,“Gaia”) I contend is essential for us to master.  In the Kubrick movie, everything rational was built into that spaceship’s all-knowing, all-controlling computer except a …. soul.  “Soul” is a term none of us can define in the same way we can’t define “happiness”. We can’t define happiness but we know it when we feel it and we know the things we can to do enhance or diminish it.  The computer, Hal, was destined to become a monster because it was constructed devoid of soul.   When the computer learned that the humans who created it were in the process of shutting it down for repairs (Hal had made an error, you may recall….just as Corporations do when they invent and market things like Thalidomide …and cigarettes, and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq) the computer&#8212;having no soul…and accordingly no empathy for the lives and souls of others, made a decision to “shut down” the life processes of all the humans aboard spaceship Discovery One. <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">It made this decision because at the core of its cyber-self, it had&#8212;as corporations have—a single driving force and purpose—survival.</span></strong> Survival of the cyber-cyborg itself, that is—and not survival of either its human creators, components or collaborators.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>By definition, a “cyborb” is an amalgamation of human and material (machine) elements to form a functional being bearing some—but not all&#8211; the attributes of both.</strong>  Cyborgs are common elements and characters in today’s Sci-Fi flicks and most of them (saving perhaps Star Wars’ R2-D2 and C-3PO) are made villains of the plots because, like Hal and today’s corporations, they lack that quality we call “soul”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">  <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Now, back to Kubric’s prophetic Space Odyssey story: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>When computers were&#8211;as the original “Univac”&#8211;limited in function to perform a few tasks faster and more efficient than men, they were very useful “tools” for humans and their many varied purposes and missions.  When and as they were improved and evolved to the point their robotic progeny were infinitely faster and more powerful than their human creators… even to the point of assimilating men’s emotional tendencies, including (fatefully in the 2001 story) the will to survive, then the computer morphed from machine to MONSTER.  (This seldom-intended negative feature of modern inventiveness is the focus of Csikszentmihalyi’s cultural caveat as taught in his tome “<em>The Evolving Self</em>” where the author outlines the dangerous consequences of the fact that men’s inventions live and continue to evolve after the inventors die. When, for example,  Henry Ford I invented the auto assembly line, he had no idea that his invention (which Csikszentmihalyi terms “meme”) would live after him and move the world to pave its surface with concrete and asphalt to the point a cyborg-accelerated world was threatened with warming itself into extinction. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The precise thing that happened fictionally with computers in Space Odyssey happened in the real world with corporations</span></strong>. Conceived long ago as a means for citizens to get together and pool their money for a common business purpose, the equivalent of a useful “Univac” type tool was invented for the advancement of an industrial culture.   Accordingly, 50 or a hundred citizens of “our town” could each—in exchange for “stock”&#8211; contribute $50 to a local furniture artisan and thus provide  him the means of teaching ten others how to do what he did and make a profit for not only themselves but for their investors. The process became axiomatic and in terms of new capitalistic parlance became known as  “taking stock” in someone or someone’s business. The sinister flaw built into the corporate system is what is termed (by lawyers) its “veil”. Shareholders who own corporations are not responsible for corporate crimes and misdeeds. When Exxon and BP are sued for environmental crimes, the only thing the stockholders risk is shrinkage in their portfolio value. Moreover, the<br />
“corporate veil” shields all its founders and officers from criminal charges where there is no evidence they “personally” knew what was going on. This anonymity and extensive immunity from responsibility is what enables the modern corporation to act and be perceived as what it in effect is—a “mob” with a government-granted license to plunder and pillage.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Initially then, corporations functioned as useful “tools” for their creators.  When Einstein first envisioned his formula E=mc2, he had in mind a means of converting Uranium into steam engine power for the world. In under 5 years that noble notion (meme) had evolved and snuffed the lives of over 246,000 human souls, and today the same notion threatens—every second—all life on earth. Mankind’s “memes” can become potentially cataclysmic.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Corporations have taken, unfortunately, the same route.  Initially a really quick and effective means of converting a solitary garage carpenter to an industrial magnate, the corporation is now a monster&#8211;actually thousands of them—in control of every single aspect of human existence, from crib to crypt.  The Supreme Court of the US has—because corporations elect and control the man (President) who appoints and controls them—calamitously  accomplished the same thing that computer programmer did when he converted 2001’s Hal into the monster that scuttled control of Kubric’s spaceship. In the decision of <strong><em>Kelo v. City of New London</em></strong>, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) the Supreme Court decided that Corporations could now tell citizens to move out of their houses because corporations want to build a shopping center on the premises for their own profit.  In the decision of <strong><em>Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission</em></strong>, 558 U.S.2010 (2010, the corporation was by the Supreme Court finally converted into a monstrous cyborg political “decider”.  Before this case, we had a law (McCain-Feingold Act) limiting corporations’ contributions to the campaigns of specific candidates.  After <strong><em>Citizens United</em></strong>, corporations are permitted to skirt around the rule because they were in effect proclaimed entitled to human rights.   Corporations can now directly elect politicians without restraint because our corporate-controlled court has ruled (5 to 4) they have the right to “free speech” although they are by non-contestable construction deaf, dumb and soulless creatures.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Remember that other cyborg previously mentioned who was accorded the power of “free speech” and what he did with it?  <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Our corporations have become ….Hal.</span></strong>  From their initial purpose of permitting 100 citizens finically to enable one to hire more in order to make more value-added commodities, corporations are now empowered to elect our Congress,  control their votes on all issues, and finally to make war.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">When corporations—as is the case today—elect our Congressmen and presidents through their now unfettered power to campaign on his and their behalf, we have succeeded in placing  cyborgs in control of spaceship America and due to the transnational nature of corporations today, the same cyborgs are insidiously in control of spaceship earth.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Get the Gaia connection yet?   The worst is yet to come.  Corporations are the ones today—making mega-billions in profits by drilling and selling oil. They are the same corporations which, with just a modicum of their profits, fund so-called “independent research institutes” (e.g. PNAC and the infamous war-mongering A.E.I) to publish the Orwellian (1984) Big Lies that  Iraq was in league with bin Laden and global warming is a liberal, “left wing” fiction.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Why would corporations put money in hired-gun phony think tanks to gainsay global warming when if the other 99.9 percent of the environmental scientists in the world are right—and global warming from carbon emissions is in fact occurring—then the corporations along with all God’s creatures and their planet, spaceship earth,  are to become …extinct?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">The answer was and will remain the same—<strong>The corporation, (and Hal, the Odyssey’s all-powerful computer) have all the power and ….no soul—and they have as a “bottom line” raison d’etre only one driving force—survival.</strong> And, since corporations were never “alive” in the human sense, “survival” of course means material (i.e. monetary…bottom-line) survival. Not survival of their corporate creators, or ironically even their corporate workers&#8212;but rather their inanimate corporate carapaces- the soulless corporations themselves. Ironically—just as the Odyssey’s computer, Hal,  would have been destroyed had his cyborg compulsion to save himself succeeded,  the real  corporations  today will themselves perish in the same environmental cataclysm that will kill us non-cyborg humans, but that is the nature of the cyborg beasts…. <strong>They are doomed to machinate their own destruction, because as other axioms go, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, and absolutely all absolute corruption ends in …destruction. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">OK, I’ve painted the ugly clouds and the looming brooding storm of potentially-lethal revolution and destruction…..and  also implied (make that…promised) to wind up this essay with a rainbow for that storm. <strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">I promised to give a solution to the problem. So here it is.</span></strong> And again I’ll borrow from Kubrick’s movie: When it becomes apparent to the character played by handsome Kier Dullea that Hal is bent on killing all humans on board the Discovery One and taking over the journey into oblivion on his cyborg lonesome, Captain Dullea has to&#8211; in essence—“take care of” Hal&#8212; i.e., control without destroying him.  <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">There is, unfortunately no human aboard who can do what Hal, the computer, does</span></strong> in calculating all that needs calculating to steer the spaceship around asteroids and black holes to safe landing on Neptune. So – “unplugging” or throwing a monkey wrench into Hal’s hard drive is out of the question. <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">So what does Discovery’s heroic captain do? </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">He performs a lobotomy on Hal</span></strong>. He crawls—quite literally—into the man-size cyber-circuited corridors of Hal’s digital brain and one at a time pulls out memory circuit boards (computer hard-drive power) until Hal’s most powerful  capacities are rendered …benignly impotent…efficaciously handicapped.  In the process, we will recall feeling some contra-intuited compassion for the poor inanimate computer as Hal approaches the realization that  his most advanced cognitive regions are being deconstructed. His voice becomes first curious, then congenial, thereafter sweet and supplicating…and finally impotent, and in a child’s voice he is left singing a melody any 2<sup>nd</sup> grader could master.  Game over. Sinister cyborg successfully converted back to useful computer (machine). Spaceship saved.  Humans survive. But this was in Kubrick’s mythical movie. What about our own, very-real and very odious corporate-cyborg-run and ruled world?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">How can we do this with today’s conundrum of interrelated (trans-global) corporations?</span></strong>  We have corporations making the expensive medicines that now both drive and cripple our health industry. We have corporations making the weapons on which our country depends in order to maintain the balance of power (hegemony) our military/industrial complex of corporations have created around the globe. When we run out of volunteer regular Army ground troops, the Blackwater corporate cyborgs have in reserve and deploy limitless contingents of mercenaries to further the corporate-contrived war plans. We have corporations now privately running America’s prisons with the disastrous result that bottom-line profits have replaced “rehabilitation” as the prime purpose of incarceration, and to attain those bottom lines we see corporations—literally&#8212;delegating prisoner supervision and control to the gang leaders of the prisoners within the institutions. Corporate-run prisons are now gang-managed, gang-breeding, crime-teaching institutions. Difficult to believe?  Google “privatized prisons”, and prepare to be scared.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">  We have corporations and their lobbies holding the purse strings of all the politicians, including Supreme Court Justices and our Oval Office C.E.O.  They are holding all the marbles<strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">. How can we get…peacefully…and efficaciously into the game of “lobotomizing” these corporations</span></strong>…i.e. reducing their presently unlimited power in order to convert them to their former status and function of helping American entrepreneurs and workers unite for the joint purpose of creating and marketing America’s ideas, products and services?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">We use the tools at hand. Those tools now include the unique revolution of (presently) 900 world-wide “occupation” forces presently under way.</span></strong> We need to spread the word faster than Paul Revere’s pony that unless we unite and face our common monster foe together, our common monster foe will &#8212; like Hal in the Odyssey&#8212;continue to divide and conquer us.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">We need to spread the alarm…to every commonplace village…… and farm… that we have seen the monster, and we know his face.  It is a cyborg of our own unwitting creation we have dubbed “Corporation.” It is the most powerful enemy in the world because he is our invited 5<sup>th</sup> column horse of toppling Troy. He is on every corner in every town. He <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">is</span></strong> our town.  Yes—Our very towns are corporations, too!  By definition and construction, corporations are predatory beasts, and the humans who construct them into their own cyborg image are, after their construction, no longer in control.  The soldiers…workers…employees and officers of those corporations are like those soldiers in the first wooden horse of Troy…They are still humans, but they are taken into places and constrained to perform acts dictated by the horse and its strategically-programmed mission and placement.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Those who saw the recent movie, “<strong><em>Up in the Air</em></strong>” will recall the epic revulsion of empathy shared by the audience with those (e.g. the character played by George Clooney) who were appointed to fly from corporate branch to remote corporate branch cutting away the human element of the corporate cyborg as it “down-sized, roboticized and off-shored” itself in order to survive in the increasingly-global arena of “to the death” cyborg competition. The parallels in the <em>“Up in the Air”</em> drama of firing corporate workers with robotic precision and programmed sympathy was uncannily reminiscent of Hal’s zombie-like serial shutting down the life support systems of his ship’s cryogenically-slumbering—and humanly trusting&#8211; crew.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">When a corporation owns a ship&#8211;call it “Valdese”&#8211;and that ship dumps mega-tons of toxins in our sea, I would wager every single human (with a soul) in that corporation hates what has happened. But what will the corporation do about it?  As Hal, cyborg master of the spaceship Discover did, the corporate monster will do what is required to continue the life of the corporation. <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">To hell with the humans within and without the corporate hull…The corporation must survive.</span></strong> How many decades did the cigarette corporations of the world know and deny knowing the lethally addicting quality of the products they were distributing to their human market? Because these corporate monsters still rule our government, they are still distributing addicting death to their human customers by the profitable bottle, syringe and pack (not to mention wars) with no end in sight.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Given the ubiquitous and seemingly limitless power of today’s corporate cyborgs, what can a crowd—even of millions—do to accomplish the equivalent of the “lobotomy” of power necessary to return to the people a semblance of the control and voice they once had in the conduct of their nation’s economic and political affairs?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 26.0pt;">THE SOLUTION </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;">Unify the Banners and Rallying Cries</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Chant a single chant. Raise a common flag. March under a common banner. Challenge a common foe—Tame the cyborgs in our midst by any and all means necessary, and yes, that includes everything espoused and prescribed in our own still very extant Declaration of Independence…. Including—especially&#8211; civil disobedience…but only if absolutely necessary, and I submit it is not.  </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">America has had one truly “real” tea party and it is high time for another.</span></strong> <strong>It is corporations controlling our nation’s healthcare and that should not be the case.</strong> <strong>It is corporations electing and controlling our politicians (on both sides of the aisle) and this should not be the case.</strong> <strong>It is corporations controlling the Pentagon when decisions are made to deploy our nation’s military to foreign lands to protect the interests of our corporations and this should not be the case. It is corporations deciding that jobs formerly performed by Americans should be exported to effectively third-world nations to be performed by essentially enslaved working classes, and this should not be the case. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Compassion and humanitarian empathy are clearly subordinate in the corporate entity and milieu to the prime mover of all such cyborgs—their own bottom-line survival. These worldwide urban “occupations” are our world’s long-overdue immune response to our presently malignant over-population of inflammatory corporate…monsters. <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">So, what do we do about this contagion of cyborg corporate cancer? </span></strong>How do we propose to covert a discordant cacophony of protests around the globe to a melodious message—and march&#8211;of revolutionary prowess and promise?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">CHANGING THE CHANTS</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">The first thing we do is obvious:  Become aware of the fact that at the karmic base of every economic and political problem in America there is a corporate cause.  Shout—no, scream<strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">—“Curb Corporations”!</span></strong>   Scream – <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">“No more Corporate Lobbyists”.</span></strong> Do not scream this at the doors of Wall Street where only corporate puppets work. Scream it in the halls of legislatures where the Cyborg lobbyists are doing their cyborg work. Scream <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">“No more (zero tolerance) corporate ads on TV for electoral candidates. </span></strong> (Don’t scream this one in front of NationsBank—Scream this one on the steps of the Supreme Court, which is where corporate cyborgs derived their new pseudo-human rights and power.) Scream- <strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Tax corporations! </span></strong>just as though they were humans…<strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">no more loopholes</span></strong>, and<strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> tax their foreign income. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Workers of the world unite. Wake up and behold the face of the enemy. There is a gap between the rich and poor today wider than at any time in history. But this is not the “fault” of the rich, but rather the “fault” of the monster corporations that made them so obscenely rich. In the secret, ivory high-rise towers of corporations there is multi-tiered life-saving money-grabbing autonomy and anonymity—a deadly combination.  It is within these unseen and  anonymous board rooms that telephones and checkbooks conspiratorially wed corporations and Congress and this is the epicenter of the conundrum we need to unwrap in order to attack (lobotomize) the soulless corporate cyborg monster. That monster is called “corporation”. It was made by humans, maintained by humans and represented by humans. But it is not itself human and never will be. And yet we have allowed it to take over complete control and steerage of our several ships of state and our planet…Spaceship Earth.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">TAKE THE REVOLUTION INTO THE FIELD</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">There is only one field that makes sense, and it’s not Wall Street, and it’s not out front of the mansions of the .3 percent of the richest.  And, ironically it’s not Washington, D.C., either at the capital or on Pennsylvania Avenue.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">No revolution fails, no war is lost, faster than one launched in the wrong theater of battle.</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The only way to lobotomize the corporate monster at the base of all our present global collapsing is in America’s State Capitals. So they—state capitals-are the natural “theater” of OWS operations and occupations. Here is why: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Both political parties running the show in our nation’s capital have long ago sold out to the corporate lobbyists who purchase their loyalty and obedience by placing them in office. The only solution, then is an end-run around Washington and a power play back in the home states of all our many heroic “occupiers” of Wall Street and the rest of the warriors carrying banners all over our country in search of a rallying point for their righteousness and their rage. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">The solution is a set of constitutional amendments which effectively lobotomize the corporate brain not to the point of destruction, but to the point of rehabilitation.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Seeking Federal legislation to strengthen corporate “oversight” in D.C. today is a dream as rational as chasing rabbits down a hole to a Mad Hatter tea party.  It’s already been tried in fact: Behold a Palin horse. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Today, the only solution for securing control of corporate power, greed and collective oligarchy is an approach never before seriously sought, and never before accomplished – </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">A Fifth-Amendment state-mandated Constitutional Convention.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>We need to take our collective and individual rage, flags, zeal and chants, and occupy our state capitals and their legislators until at least 3 of 4 of them have agreed to demand (of Congress) and  ratify serial amendments to the U.S. Constitution as follows:  (Note: only a two-thirds majority of states is required to mandate a  Constitutional Convention, but ultimately the amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of the states, so why wait. Let the goal be four fifths from the first, so that when ratification time comes around, there’s clearly a three-fourth’s majority still extant. )</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS</span> . . . </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;" align="center"><strong>Collectively Needed to End Corporate Dominance of America and the World (Following as is expected, the American Paradigm and Model even in Revolution): </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>Prefatory Note: </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Most all (10 of 13) of the amendments here proposed are negatives (prohibitions), and the logic for this is ancient- tried and true. The prosaic paradigm that springs to mind for illustration is that of the Zen Sculptor, perhaps the world’s greatest parable for proactive creativity and successful….revolution. We can’t always envision how things should be or will become in order to remedy the disorder or chaos we are presently facing. No, I cannot outline for you all the positive, efficacious and politically-functional measures we must as a culture and country take in order to restore America and the world to their former greatness and geo-political homeostasis. But I can—and with absolute certainty will&#8211;outline some of the things we can start eliminating and saying “no” to in order to keep things moving inexorably in the right direction. When and as things are kept moving in the “right direction”, important aspects of those things begin to take shape. Positive change is achieved by incrementally eliminating negatives…as in the parable of the Zen Sculptor:  In this sage story, the student approaches his master while the latter is carving a large stone and says: “Master, what will the sculpture be when it is finished?” The sage answers and in the process reveals the method in the strategic negations (prohibitions) that follow herein. The sage’s reply to his student is ours to adopt: “I do not know. But with each strike of the hammer and chisel I can determine absolutely what it is not.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The 13 New State-Initiated and Ratified Revolutionary Amendments to the Constitution of the Liberated United States of No-Longer-Corporate-Controlled   America:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Preamble: </strong>The term “corporation” shall be deemed to include regular corporations, Subchapter S Corporations, Limited Liability Corporations, publicly and/or privately owned, and companies, partnerships,  charitable corporations, trusts, foundations, and any and all non-human entities recognized by state and/or federal law as entities chartered, licensed or otherwise authorized by state and federal authorities to transact business or provide services (including media broadcast and/or entertainment services) in, and/or outside the United States of America regardless of the country where the said entity was originally formed.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"><strong> </strong></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>No American federal politician shall serve more than two terms of 4 years in office.  </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>No American candidate for federal or state office shall maintain any financial interest—vested, unvested or future&#8211; in any corporation with whom the U.S. or State governments transact any business, nor accept more than $1000 from any entity, either human or corporate as a campaign contribution. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>All communications between Congressmen (Representatives and Senators) and all lobbyists and other citizens shall be recorded and all recordings along with records of all visits and collaborations shall become public record. All communications between Congressmen and corporate lobbyists must be either written or transcribed into writing and made public records.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>The offering or acceptance of any gift (of money, services or material, present or prospective) to any Congressman from any person or corporation totaling over $5O  (in any calendar year) in value shall constitute a felony and cause for summary impeachment and criminal prosecution.  </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>Corporations are prohibited from directly or indirectly contributing funds or support of any kind in the making, public airing or dissemination—by any means&#8211; of public relations information designed or reasonably calculated to influence any voters in any election, either State or Federal. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>No elected, appointed or hired official, State or Federal, shall, after serving his State or Federal Government, pursue or accept employment by any corporation with whom the said official had any official dealings  during the official’s term of office. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>No person shall serve as an employee or elected official of either State or Federal government while owning stock or any interest whatsoever (future, inchoate, option or derivative interest) in any corporation providing any goods or services to or transacting any business with the State or Federal governments.  </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>All citizens of the United States, individual and corporate, shall be taxed for all income earned in the U.S. and abroad (outside the territorial limits of the United States of America) as if that income had been earned—as ordinary income&#8211;within the United States. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>All elected officials of the Federal Government shall be granted healthcare benefits for themselves and their families only while in office, and those healthcare benefits shall be equivalent to and not exceed the benefits currently received by citizens receiving either Medicare or Medicaid, which ever is greater. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
</ul>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>There will be no retirement pensions given Federal elected officials or retirement plans to any extent funded by the American government except social security or other benefits equivalent to those provided regular (all) American citizens by the Federal Government.  </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>There will be no laws enacted by Congress which increase the pay levels of Congressmen during the remaining terms of their offices.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>Corporations are hereafter prohibited from producing and broadcasting media programs and/or publications tendered to the public as “news” programs or publications unless at the beginning and end of all such broadcasts or literary publishings, there is a clear and complete listing of the names (all) of the individuals and/or corporations who own, either directly or indirectly the broadcast stations and/or media syndicates which own and/or in any way control the broadcast/publishing content of said “news” programs and publications.   Any broadcast programs or publications which eschew the term “news” and publish a clear and cogent statement that they are expressing their own opinions and those of their named guests appearing on said broadcast shows, need not publish such a list of corporate or individual owners. </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><strong>All individuals and corporations will pay a graduated tax on all income, foreign and domestic,  varying from zero (defined as currently-calculated poverty-level subsistence), and ranging from 10 percent to 50 percent.  All “loopholes” are prohibited. A graduated inheritance tax will be imposed as well ranging from 10 to 75 percent excluding the first one-million dollars per individual (living at decedent’s death) lineal descendant, per stirpes.  </strong></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: .75in;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left: .75in;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Now,  in the words of U.S. Airlines Flight 93, All-American hero,  Todd Beamer . . . </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left: .75in; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left: .75in; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>LET’S ROLL!</strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: .75in; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>The </strong><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">Cardinal Rule of the OWS’ Revolution</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>must—of necessity—be and without exception remain -</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt;">Be nice, be legal and be THERE!</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: .75in;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Translated: This means – Don’t give the establishment-controlled police the slightest justification for tear-gassing or otherwise running us off the lawns of the State Capitals!  Throw an empty milk carton or diaper on the lawn and they’ve got a reason. Sleep or camp out on public property in a manner contrary to law and they’ve got a reason. You need to drive yourself “to work” like all other capital city workers do, peacefully occupy the governmental facades and  promenades of your state while you chant the common rallying call to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">peaceful revolution by Constitutional resolution!</span>  The OWS manual of “arms” refers to PEACEFUL arms carrying signs, banners, trumpets, babies, food and water for each other&#8212; arms that lift each other off the corporate-dominated dirt into the freedom of freshly-cleared American air.  </strong></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: .75in;"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>So, treat the Revolutionary Occupation as your 9-to-5 job (but be there at 7:45 before the law makers and their corporate bosses get to work—beat the legislative street walkers and their corporate lobbying pimps to work.) </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Stand, sit, do your thing PEACEFULLY on the lawns and squares and clean up like Semper Fi Marines when the day is done and you go home. If you camp out on the lawns and malls of your state legislative summits,  take care not to give them cause to arrest you.  Our allies and marching soulmates in the towns of our own state capitals should provide us a bed, and hopefully some table and other bread to boot. We will be fighting their war as well, because their war is our war and our revolution their revolution. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Don’t give the corporate bullies what they want and require.  Give them what they can’t possibly deal with—a rational, legal, orderly, determined, righteous, relentless and constantly-accreting conspicuous occupation until the world rallies behind its peaceful revolutionary leaders and the revolutionary change is….achieved. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">FINALLY&#8212; THE PROOF OF THE</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">OWS VICTORY FORMULA:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">OWS</span></strong><strong><sup><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">40</span></sup></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 30.0pt;">/C=RCA</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>Now you know: </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>The “40” (as in “to the power of 40”) means the 40 sovereign states which OWS must occupy until they petition Congress for a Constitutional Convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution and get those states to ratify the amendments by a 3/4ths majority (with a safety margin of 2.5 states). </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> The first “C” stands for “Corporations”</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>The “R” stands for “Revolution”</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>The Second “C” stands for “Constitution”</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>And the “A” stands for “Amendments”</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>So now, with your 6<sup>th</sup> grade algebra skills you can <span style="text-decoration: underline;">prove</span> the OWS formula for VICTORY: </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> OWS<sup>40</sup>/C= RCA</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>OWS<sup>40</sup>/C=RCA/1</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;" align="center"><strong>(at this point the Corporate common denominator (“C”) on the “left” side of the equation is canceled out by the Constitution Numerator “C” on the “<span style="text-decoration: underline;">right</span>” side, leaving:</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;">OWS</span></strong><strong><sup><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;">40</span></sup></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> = RA* </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">*(Revolution by Constitutional Amendment)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Let’s launch a new and courageous Odyssey of our own.</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Let us unify these scattered 900 points of stellar revolutionary luminescence and fashion them into fierce constellations of revolutionary warriors who together climb into the cyborg brain of the corporate beast and perform the needed lobotomy, so that once again, the cyborg corporate beast works for us…. we the people….we the old ones and bold ones, the young ones and done ones, the now united ones with  sinew and  soul.   </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Robert R. (Dusty) Schoch</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Founder, B.E.A. (“Barristers et al”, a N.C.-based peace-oriented            foreign policy think tank)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">E-mail:</span></strong> <a href="mailto:Rschoch@triad.rr.com"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Rschoch@triad.rr.com</span></strong></a><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Founding Editor:</span></strong> <a href="http://www.DeclaringIndependents.com"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">www.DeclaringIndependents.com</span></strong></a><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">October 26, 2011</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<hr />
<div align="center"><a class="style3" href="#">TOP </a></div>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=985</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS:</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=81</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=81#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS:   Confronting and Dealing with the Dying Beast…   The Mythical Monster of “Free Market Capitalism”   EDITORIAL NOTE:  The present article is in four parts, consisting of: (1) Dr. Leonard Carrier’s forthcoming  presentation at the University &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=81">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=81" data-text="GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS:" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D81&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<hr />
<div class="style2" align="justify">
<div align="justify">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Bold'; font-size: 16.0pt;">GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Confronting and Dealing with the</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Dying Beast…</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The Mythical Monster of “Free Market Capitalism”</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">EDITORIAL NOTE</span></span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">: </span></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> <strong>The present article is in four parts, consisting of:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>(1) Dr. Leonard Carrier’s forthcoming  presentation at the University of Miami’s Philosophy Colloquium Series on February 27, 2009 of his essay captioned:</li>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Myth of Free-Market Capitalism</span>”</p>
<li>(2) DI Editor, Dusty Schoch’s reactions to Carrier’s thesis, extending the subject matter from exposition to revolutionary remediation</li>
<li>(3) <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tom Friedman‘s </span>(NY Times columnist) very comprehensive and thought-provoking commentary on the pro’s and cons of how our new (Obama’s) administration is and/or should be dealing with the myriad maladies being precipitated by an economic system which may have functionally and/or morally become irreparably obsolete</li>
<p> and finally&#8230;</p>
<li>(4) Dusty’s rant entitled “<span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Rand Syndrome</span>” where occasion is taken to slam dunk the notion that Ayn Rand’s recently disinterred  version of neo-conservative capitalism “enlightened selfishness” (a precursor to Reaganomics) offers any chance of deliverance in the case of America’s fall from fiscal grace…</li>
</ol>
<p></span>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">February 5, 2009. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><br /> (1)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">The Myth of Free-Market Capitalism</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">By: DI  Senior Associate Editor,  Dr. Leonard Carrier</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            People are fond of their myths, especially those that promise better times ahead.  Perhaps myth-making is a means of retaining optimism in the face of what reason sees as good grounds for pessimism.  But, as Hume famously said, reason by itself moves nothing; it is, and ought to be, a slave of the passions. What I wish to expose in what follows is a myth that has come to dominate our economic thinking, which is that of free-market capitalism.  It is common to think that there is no other variety of capitalism rather than the free-market kind, but this is a mistake.  Capitalism is the view that a nation’s economy, for the most part, is better left in private hands rather than being centrally planned by government.  In this respect it differs from Socialism or Fascism, where, although private industry is allowed, it is in all respects directed by government decree or regulation. It is perhaps helpful, then, to distinguish capitalism from “statism,“ allowing that there might be different varieties or degrees of capitalism, some in which private business is monitored carefully by the state, as it is in China; and other varieties in which government regulation of the economy is either stronger or weaker&#8211;stronger in the case of Germany, weaker in the United States, and weaker still in Russia.  A free-market capitalism would then be capitalism without any government regulations or restraints.  It would constitute a free market in which property rights are exchanged voluntarily by mutual consent of buyers and sellers, without coercion or constraint, where prices are determined solely by supply and demand, and where government does not directly or indirectly regulate prices or supplies.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            It is obvious that there is no such thing as a free-market capitalism operating in the world today, especially not in the United States.  Even those who champion free markets make exceptions for such things as patents and copyrights. As Dean Baker points out (“Free Market Myth,” <em>Boston Review</em>, January/February 2009), patents and copyrights are “government-granted protections designed for a specific public purpose,” namely, to promote science and the arts.  But whether copyrights are the most effective means for achieving this goal is a matter for empirical investigation. In similar fashion, Baker points out that it is through government-guaranteed patent protection that pharmaceutical companies can sell their brand-name drugs for more than a thousand per cent of what they would cost in a free market.  In any case, copyrights and patents constitute government regulation of the free market, in these cases regulations that favor businesses such as publishing companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers.  There might be other government mechanisms that “promote science and innovation” that are more public-friendly than patents and copyrights, but to say that they would constitute government interference disguises the fact that government has already interfered by protecting certain business interests, perhaps at the expense of the general welfare.  Invention and creativity deserve encouragement, but this might be accomplished by direct government subsidies to those who advance medicine and the arts.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Free-market economists might agree with the claim that no free market exists, but that (1) if not for government interference free markets would exist naturally, and (2) that it would be better for all if we strived to approximate free market capitalism in the real world.  A defense of (2) is usually called <em>laissez-faire </em>economics, in which government is confined to intervene in economic matters only to regulate against force and fraud among market participants, and perhaps to raise taxes to fund the maintenance of the free market.  It is my contention that (1) and (2) constitute the myth of free-market capitalism, and that both of them are demonstrably false.  I shall argue first against (1).        </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The notion that there is a sort of historical inevitability about the rise of free markets has been championed recently by Thomas Friedman, especially in his book, <em>The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first century</em>.  Friedman argues that technological innovation has “flattened” the world in that we now operate in a global economy, one in which inexorable technological advances fuel world-wide economic development and therefore shape society.  Politics and culture serve sometimes to retard human progress, but in the end they cannot prevail against technological innovation and the increase of productivity.  In this respect, Friedman echoes the view expressed in 1848 by Marx and Engels in <em>The Communist Manifesto</em>.  Here is a celebrated passage from the latter work which Friedman accepts as a suitable preface to his own view of global “flattening“:</span></p>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="col" width="8%"> </th>
<th scope="col" width="92%">
<div align="left">All that is solid melts into the air, all that is holy is profaned,</p>
<p> and man is at last compelled to face with his sober senses his</p>
<p> real conditions of of life and his relations with his kind. The</p>
<p> need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases</p>
<p> the bourgeoisie over the whole surface of the globe. It must </p>
<p> nestle everywhere, settle everywhere, establish connections</p>
<p> everywhere….It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to</p>
<p> adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to</p>
<p> introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e., to </p>
<p> become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world</p>
<p> after its own image.</p></div>
</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">The similarity of Friedman’s view to that of Marx and Engels lies in the premise that such globalization is compatible with only one economic system.  The difference lies in what sort of economic system that turns out to be.  For Marx, global capitalism would, after many convulsions, revolutions, and wars, finally give way to the communist order, in which nationalism and religion would be left behind, and humanity would no longer experience war and poverty.  For Friedman, such globalization leads inexorably to a free-market economy among nations in which freedom and democracy are spread throughout the world.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            It has been pointed out by John Gray, in his review of Friedman’s book (<em>The New York Review of Books</em>, Vol. 52, No. 13, August 11, 2005) that Friedman’s view adopts all of the weaknesses of Marx’s view while neglecting its strengths.  Marx was aware of the self-destructive aspects of unfettered capitalism, viewing it as a revolutionary force whose world-wide expansion was bound to be disruptive and violent&#8211;destroying industries, governments, and ways of life in turning societies upside down.  Friedman simply views such conflicts as friction to be overcome&#8211;sand tossed in the machinery, which is bound to be removed by unstoppable technological progress.  It was this sort of optimism that led Friedman to champion our invasion of Iraq, unaware that the forces of nationalism and religion can still provide a stern antidote to the allure of the free market.  Marx would not have been surprised to see capitalism and industrialization give rise to war and revolution.  Friedman ignores this result because he mistakenly identifies the ongoing process of globalization with free-market capitalism, and thinks of the latter as embodying utopian hopes of freedom and democracy.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Both Marx and Friedman are mistaken in the conflation of globalization and free-market capitalism.  As John Gray points out in his review of Friedman’s book, there is a difference between accepting the view that we live in a period of increasing technological progress that links up events throughout the world, and the view that this process inevitably leads to one worldwide economic system.  The former view is properly called “globalization,” but there is no proven systematic connection between globalization and either free-market capitalism or a communistic society.  Globalization may be unstoppable, but the economic systems that it creates do not necessarily merge into one.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            There is no historical or technological determinism that naturally creates free markets.  On the contrary, it has been governments that have promulgated and conducted every case of  free-market experiment. This conclusion is defended forcefully by John Gray in his book <em>False Dawn:  The Delusions of Global Capitalism</em> (1998).  Gray points out that <em>laissez-faire </em>capitalism in Victorian Great Britain arose neither from a long process of evolution nor did it occur by sheer happenstance.  Instead, it was engineered by the British government through Enclosures that transferred common land into private property.  This created a capitalistic economy of large, landed estates.  Repeal of the Corn laws in 1846  gave rise to <em>laissez-faire </em>thinking in England that survived until the Great Depression.  It wasn’t until the 1980s and the Thatcherite government that free-market thinking was re-engineered, only to last for as long as Mrs. Thatcher’s tenure in government.  In Japan, Russia, Germany, and the United States through its long history of protectionism, state intervention has always been involved in economic development.  Only recently in the United States has our government, under the influence of economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, flirted with the notion of creating a global free market.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Free-market thinking, like the Marxist proposal, is merely a different facet of the Enlightenment project of the 17<sup>th</sup> and 18<sup>th</sup> centuries.  Spurred on by John Locke’s empiricist thought and his criticism of the Divine Right of Kings, the French <em>philosophes</em>&#8211;Diderot, D’Alembert, Condorcet, and Rousseau&#8211;championed three main ideas that the influenced political thought of the times.  The first was that through the use of reason human beings could discard the corruptions of superstition and religion and provide an environment in which the natural is distinguished from the artificial, human rights are recognized,  and humanity can begin its progress towards a utopian future.  It is salient that Condorcet held fast to the ideas he expressed in his <em>Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Spirit</em>, even as he lay dying in the squalor of a French prison. The Enlightenment idea of human progress is present, not only in Marx’s idea of the inevitability of the formation of a communist society, but also in the late twentieth-century doctrine of free markets as the natural outcome of free individuals using reason to progress to a global democratic society in which natural rights to liberty and property are respected and result in the benefit of all.  This idea of human progress has become so ingrained in the popular imagination that the publication of Darwin’s <em>Origin of Species </em>in 1859 did no more than divert the course of utopian thinking, so that the evolution of species became but a stepping stone to dreaming of the evolution of the human spirit to a higher and more rational plane.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            In Great Britain, unlike in France (with the exception of Voltaire), Enlightenment ideas were received with more skepticism.  Even though David Hume, Samuel Johnson, and Edmund Burke found a place for human reason, they did not accept the notion of a potential human rationality that led to a utopian end state.  Even Adam Smith, whom free-market thinkers love to quote, did not believe in the perfectability of man through the use of reason and the free markets.  Both Smith and Hume based their ethical theory on moral sentiments, not on reason, with right and wrong being determined by sympathy and fellow-feeling.  For Adam Smith, the notion of <em>laissez-faire </em>economics was simply a working principle, subject to modifications in practice, a far cry from the free-market belief that the increase of production by itself could determine human well being.  Smith, as did his earlier contemporary Joseph Butler (1692-1752), believed that  acting from enlightened self-interest would probably result in better consequences than acting on impulse or even from altruistic motives, but they both agreed that most of our actions did not stem from such a motive, nor should they.  Voltaire, at the end of his <em>Candide</em>, espouses the same sentiment when he suggests that we would all be better off if we cultivated our own gardens&#8211;but he doesn’t say that this is what all of us are bound to do.  John Gray sums it up in <em>False Dawn</em> by claiming that free-market ideology in the United States is simply a relic of the Enlightenment, belonging to John Locke’s world, not to ours. He declares that whereas American free-marketers espouse pieties such as human rights being rooted in a Christian God, that American customs stem from natural law, and that limited government is required to respect private property, these platitudes simply mask the plural world we live in.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Because Adam Smith was impressed with the way in which the division of labor resulted in increased production, contemporary free-marketers have appropriated Smith’s ideas in order to make productivity the key to world-wide economic well-being.  Most frequently cited is Smith’s reference to an “invisible hand” in <em>The Wealth of Nations</em>, the mechanism by which an individual, being guided solely by self-interest in his economic decisions and behavior, can effect consequences that work to the betterment of all.  Yet Smith mentioned an invisible hand only once in this immense work, and the passage in which the reference occurs really does nothing to support the claims that global free-marketers make for it. This is because the passage in question is concerned with the merits of choosing domestic products over imported ones and has nothing to do with global free markets.  Because the passage has usually been quoted in an abridged form, I shall quote it more fully to make my point.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">                        As every individual, therefore, endeavours as much as he can both to employ his capital  in the support of domestic industry, and so to direct that industry that its produce may be of the greatest value; every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can.  He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it.  By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry        in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.  Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was      no part of it.  By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. (p. 572, Bantam Classic edition)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            It seems clear from the this passage that Smith is championing the home market over foreign ones, and claiming that  promoting the home market normally benefits the society in which one lives, even though that benefit was not intended.  Smith goes on to claim that sometimes it is better for the society to buy imported goods when they cannot be more cheaply manufactured at home; but, this is again always with an eye toward benefiting one’s own countrymen and not those in other countries.  Thus, by no means was Smith speaking of how one could best benefit members of a global society.  Put in contemporary terms, what Smith is saying is that we should “look for the union label” when we buy, because giving preference to that which is manufactured at home usually works to the betterment of the society in which we live.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The foundation of free-market thinking is that rational human beings, each by selfishly seeking his own good, will promote the good of all. Yet this assumes that we humans are or can be rational in seeking our economic good.  It is not that free-marketers are unaware of decisions based on faulty information, or on emotional bias, but they assume that such distortions can be corrected by the use of reason.  It is precisely this assumption that appears to be false.  J. D. Trout, in his book, <em>The Empathy Gap:  Building Bridges to the Good Life and the Good Society </em>(2009), lists several cases in which the use of reason is no antidote to the way we make decisions, suggesting that emotional bias is hard-wired into our central nervous systems and cannot be removed easily, if at all.  Trout mentions “base-rate neglect,” according to which we tend to worry more about exotic disasters that are unlikely to happen than about more familiar ones that are.  For instance, people worry more about avian flu, which has yet killed no one in the United States, and yet they neglect to get an ordinary flu shot to prevent the flu that kills 36,000 Americans each year. This phenomenon has also been called “probability neglect,” according to which people show more worry about dreadful but unlikely happenings, such as terrorist killings in the United States, whereas they tend to ignore the far more likely but mundane happening, such as the levees of New Orleans breaching during a hurricane. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Trout also mentions an “over-confidence bias,” which makes us underestimate challenges and risks.  For example, we elect to drive rather than fly because we think we’re in control of our automobiles, whereas we know that traffic accidents account for far more fatalities than airline travel.  Another irrational spring to our thought and action Trout calls an “anchoring bias,” according to which misinformation lodges in our brains, even after proven to be false.  This is why “negative advertising” in political campaigns proves so effective.  Everyone claims to deplore the spread of such misinformation,  but it has results.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            In 1979, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky made a study of irrational behavior in various risk and financial situations.  Their article, “Prospect Theory:  An Analysis of Decision under Risk,”  gave rise to the discipline of Behavioral Economics. Their work provides evidence that, not only is such behavior ingrained in us, but that it can be manipulated.  Free-marketers assume that in the ideal situation, agents are well-informed, that their preferences are well-ordered and stable, and that their actions are controlled, self-centered, and calculating. The psychological research shows, however, that people’s judgments are biased, and their preferences are changeable and unstable. If this is so, then one’s everyday actions cannot be made to fit into the frame of rational self-interest.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            In financial matters, research has shown that people are “loss aversive,” so that, for example, they hold onto a losing stock even though they have rational justification that it will continue to fall. Some studies even suggest that the fear of a loss has twice the psychological impact as the lure of a gain.  People also fail to regard sunk costs, fail to consider opportunity costs, and fall prey to money illusion. The latter phenomenon occurs when people mistake the face-value of currency for its purchasing power.  For instance, people tend to think of a 2% cut in pay when there is no inflation as unfair, whereas they believe that a 2% raise where there is 4% inflation as fair.  Money illusion allows employers to offer nominal raises during high inflation, thereby cutting the real purchasing power of their employees without raising any protests.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            People also have a difficult time predicting their future preferences, even though they have the necessary information to do so. For instance, although a person might know that he won’t be driving a sports car at age 80, he might continue researching the futuristic models in <em>Car and Driver</em>.  Far from being calculatingly selfish, we tend to put a value on fairness in our dealings with others.  This is shown in what behavioral economists call the “Ultimate Game.” In the game you and your partner are given $100, which you are called upon to split. Whatever division of the money you propose, if your partner accepts it, you are both richer by that amount. Reason suggests that a partner should accept even a $90 &#8211; $10 split, but the experiment showed that any split less than $70 &#8211; $30 was usually rejected.  We also tend to make important financial decisions based on a passing whim or emotion, usually overestimating risk over reward. With regard to risk, we seem to evaluate it with a pre-historic brain which hasn’t adapted to our relatively predator-free environment in which most dangers are gone.  Our perception of risk is based largely on our feelings, not our reason, which is why people constantly make bad financial decisions. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            How irrational a consumer might be is illustrated in the “$.99” factor in retail pricing.  According to the classical economic theory adopted by the free-marketers, consumers make rational choices based on price comparisons and other objective factors. But people actually think they are getting a bargain by buying something for $19.99 rather than for $20.00.  Researchers explain this phenomenon according to the “right digit signal” and the “left digit signal” in one’s brain. Because people read from left to right, we place more importance of the first number we read.  When students were asked to compare $99.99 with $150.00 and then compare $100 to $150, they saw the gap between $99.99 and $150.00 as being significantly larger. Even though the students understood what they were doing, they still rated $99.99 as a significantly better price than $100.  This phenomenon allows retailers to convince people that items priced at $99.99 are “on sale,” whereas, similar items priced at $100.00 are not.  Though it defies reason, the emotional kick of getting a $.01 discount actually makes a difference to consumer spending, though I doubt whether many of us would bother to stoop and pick up a penny that was lying in the street.  All these examples show that the classical notion of <em>homo economicus </em>has no basis in reality, and therefore premise (1), which assumed that free markets are the natural outcome of rational decisions cannot be true.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Free-market economists, however, are not fazed by such criticism. Members of the so-called “Austrian School” of economics, whose most notable lights are Ludwig von Mises and Friedich Hayek, would dispute the psychological evidence as showing that human beings are fundamentally irrational.  Michael Rozeff of the Ludwig von Mises Institute defends free-market capitalism in “What Do Austrians Mean by ‘Rational’?” (07/26/2006)  by claiming that the conclusions of the Behavioral Economists are false because they are based on a faulty model of rationality.  Rozeff cites von Mises in claiming that all voluntary action is rational.  This is because it has some aim in satisfying the desires of the agent. Thus, even though individuals might make systematic errors in their choices, this does nothing to show that they are irrational in doing so or that government interference in free markets can “cure the human race of whatever limitations it might possess.”  For Rozeff, there is no excuse to resort to “statism“ to correct any human defects, because these defects are always magnified by government interference, exerting unnecessary control over free individuals.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            There are two main defects in Rozeff’s criticism.  The first is his view that there is an exclusive disjunction between free markets and “statism,” and that if you do not support free markets, you are committed to an economy that must be centrally planned.  This error is due to viewing free-market capitalism as the only sort of capitalism, so that if you reject free markets you must thereby reject capitalism and be committed to a “statist” view of economics, such as socialism.  This mistake is made obvious by considering the capitalist economies of other countries such as Germany, Japan, and China, all of which have capitalistic economies but which are regulated in some measure by their governments, even though they are not “statist” economies.  Capitalistic economies have a variety of forms. The individualistic Anglo-Saxon varieties in place in the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand are different from those in Asia and Europe, where cultural differences lead to different economic models.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The second mistake of Rozeff’s analysis is lodged in his claim that all voluntary action is rational.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">This is not the view of rationality that is embodied in the claim by free marketers that people act with a view to their self interest in making economic decisions.  The psychological experiments have shown that people do not act in their own best interests in making economic decisions.  To claim that “all human action is rational,” even though this action is emotionally biased, is to confuse rationality with causation.  To insist that all human action is rational is then no more than to say that it has a cause in the desires, however much emotionally colored, of the agent. This is to confuse action which has a rational justification with an action that “has a reason,” that is, an action that is caused by some desire or other.  The psychological experiments mentioned above did not deny that voluntary actions are caused by reasons.  What they denied is that these reasons are ones that are rationally justifiable in leading to the actual interest of the agent.  Another way of expressing this is to distinguish between actions that are performed with regard to one’s self interest, which is what free marketers really must claim is the foundation of one’s economic freedom, and actions that are taken because one just happens to be interested in them.  The latter allow for voluntary actions that ensue even though they occur through emotional bias; but it is the former that free marketers must insist is the basis for economic decisions.  Actions that stem from emotionally influenced desires, such as smoking, eating fast foods, and driving after drinking, do not usually result in one’s actual self interest.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Still, it is the free-marketer’s claim that if individual economic decisions are flawed, then so much more so must be the decisions of those who would regulate a free market, especially since the possession of power over our economic decisions is likely to exacerbate whatever defects individuals have and create even more.  As Rozeff puts it, “The institutional apparatus of government is always less responsive and less accountable to human needs and desires than free markets.” (<em>ibid</em>.)  It is this claim that I shall now examine:  the view expressed in (2) that, regardless how any free-markets actually arose, of whether they really exist at all, it would be better for everyone if they did exist, and it would be best of all if they existed globally, with no government regulation or hindrance whatsoever.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The trouble with this claim is that it has no empirical evidence at all to back it.  It rests solely on the notion that the exercise of individual freedom in one’s economic behavior is a good above all others, and that this applies not only to individual people, but also to corporations and companies that are treated as “persons” under the law.  In its extreme form, this view results in Libertarianism, in which the rights to one’s life and property trump all other rights, so that one should have the unfettered freedom to protect these rights against those who would override them in the name of a common good.  One does not have to criticize Libertarianism, however, in order to present counterexamples showing that individuals acting selfishly from perfect economic freedom rarely enhance the good of others, or even themselves.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The first counterexample involves what is known as “the tragedy of the commons.”  This especially of note when resources are scarce.  For example, if  an island nation depends on its livelihood on fishing harvests, it is in the interest of each individual fisherman to catch as many fish as possible, especially if the fish grow scarcer.  If each fisherman competes more and more vigorously for the remaining fish, this behavior will ensure that the supply of fish is depleted and that eventually no one will have any fish.  An actual example of this kind has been documented by Jared Diamond in his book, <em>Collapse:  How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed </em>(2005).  Diamond’s research lists severe deforestation as the reason for the collapse of the Easter Island society in the 18<sup>th</sup> century, because there was no wood available for the sea-going canoes that Easter Islanders needed for deep-sea fishing.  One of the reasons for the deforestation was that the islanders used enormous quantities of wood to transport and raise the large stone statues the remnants of which remain there today.  Apparently, there was a competition between rival clans to erect the most imposing statue, and so the wood supply was gradually depleted and the society failed.  What was once a prosperous society of as many as 30,000 in 1680 destroyed itself largely through a self-interested competition that overexploited its resources, leaving only 111 islanders by 1872.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Another example of the tragedy of the commons concerns how self-interested behavior offers no benefit to society during a recession.  During such economic downturns it is in each economic agent’s self-interest to increase his savings and cut his expenditures, because the recession threatens his income.  But if each agent’s pursues his own individual interest in this way, the overall spending of the economy will be reduced, the recession will deepen, and everyone will suffer more. This has been called “the paradox of thrift.”  Classic Keynesian economics calls for having government increase national spending, thereby stimulating the economy and thus end the recession to the benefit of all.  If such government intervention offers the best course of action, then this falsifies (2)&#8211;although unless these funds are directed toward job creation and improvement of the infrastructure the effort is likely to fail.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            A second sort of counterexample to what free-marketers claim in (2) is the phenomenon known as “the race to the bottom.”  For example, if a state acts in its own self-interest by underbidding others in lowering taxes, reducing spending, and eliminating regulation, so as to make it more attractive to financial interests, then other states can only compete by doing more of the same; so a “race to the bottom” ensues with each state being worse off than it would have been had the states cooperated rather than acting in a purely self-interested way.  The race to the bottom is a special case of The Prisoner’s Dilemma, in which the optimal outcome for an entire group of participants results from cooperation of the participants, whereas the optimal outcome of each individual is not to cooperate while others do cooperate.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            A simple example of a race to the bottom concerns tax competition among nations. Each nation may benefit from having a high tax on corporate profits to promote income equality.  But nations can benefit individually with a lower corporate tax rate to attract businesses from other nations.  This would hurt all the nations except the one that lowered the tax rate.  In order to be competitive, each of the other nations would have to lower its tax rate, thereby “racing to the bottom” with a result that is less favorable in promoting income equality and the good of all.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Free-market capitalism has precipitated a race to the bottom in the United States, beginning in 1980 with the adoption of what has been called “supply-side economics,” credited to Arthur Laffer.  According to this view, if corporations were given tax cuts and given free rein to seek out the most favorable business environment world-wide, they would increase their own wealth and thereby increase the wealth of American citizens.   Opponents of this view called it “trickle-down economics,” in which the riches of American producers would trickle down American workers.  Unfortunately, the wealth did not trickle down.  Instead, the tax cuts gave rise to large deficits in the Federal budget, American manufacturers lost out to foreign competition that could produce goods more cheaply, and American workers lost their jobs to those in other countries.  Through increased productivity, tax cuts, and a lower wage base, the producer class became extremely wealthy, but average citizens became worse off.  As John Gray points out in <em>False Dawn</em>, the United States became the only advanced society in which corporate productivity increased whereas the income of the majority has stagnated or fallen.  Between 1973 and 1993, $200 billion that used to go the worst-off 3/5 of the population now went to the 1/5 that was best-off.  A study by Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty (2006) showed that total reported income increased by 9% in 2005, with the mean income of the top 1% increasing by 14% while the bottom 90% dropping by 0.6%.  Thus, free-market competition, tax cuts for the wealthy, and massive borrowing to finance government spending has resulted in increased income inequality in which most of the population are worse off than they would otherwise be.  As of this writing our national debt stands and $10.7 trillion and counting.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            The loss of jobs created by this race to the bottom has also damaged families, neighborhoods, and increased the crime rate.  In the United States today mass imprisonment acts as a surrogate for community controls that have been destroyed or weakened.  In 1994 more than 5 million Americans were under some form of legal restraint.  One and a half million people were in jail, which is ten times the number in European countries, and legal restraint has become the only effective means of social control, especially for drug offenses. The problem is exacerbated by creating prison dependency, as well as having those with minor offenses exposed to the teachings of seasoned criminals. When the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 was signed by President Clinton, it divested government of most of its responsibility for welfare, creating a permanent underclass that is effectively managed only by incarceration or the threat of it.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Free-market capitalism thrives on privatization and deregulation.  One of the most notable examples of how this practice has backfired concerns the Glass-Steagall Banking Act of 1933.  This Act prohibited a bank holding company from owning other financial institutions, thus separating commercial from investment banking, and it was passed in order to control speculation when much of the banking system collapsed in 1933.  The Glass-Steagall Act was repealed in 1999, and in 2008 many U.S. financial institutions failed because banks had taken on too much debt with risky mortgages. This could not have taken place had Glass-Steagall not been repealed.  A similar case concerns the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), established as a government agency to make mortgages more available to low-income families.  In 1968 Fannie Mae was converted to a private shareholder corporation in order to remove it from the Federal budget.  In 1999, Fannie Mae was pressed by institutions in the primary mortgage market to ease credit requirements so that loans could be made to sub-prime borrowers.  At the same time, shareholders pressed Fannie Mae to maintain its record profits, and the Clinton administration wanted more loans to be made to lower-income borrowers.  As a result, Fannie Mae made some very risky loans; so when the housing bubble burst in 2008, the government was forced to place Fannie Mae into conservatorship.  If Fannie Mae had not first been privatized and then been so loosely regulated, this could not have happened.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            What the free-market ideologues apparently refuse to accept is that there are other goods that might override that of economic freedom.  Among other things valued are physical security, adequate food and shelter, the availability of health-care, a sense of community, and having the opportunity to find structure and meaning in one’s life.  All the counterexamples to free-market capitalism concern the clash between the freedom to gain economic advantage and one or more of these other human goods.  If the purpose of having a sound economy is to benefit the society that enjoys it, then these counterexamples show that the society as a whole does not benefit. Treating economic freedom as if it had no other result than one’s profit is to blind oneself to its other deleterious consequences.  If one wonders why the free-marketers  in the Ludwig von Mises Institute refuse to accept these counterexamples, perhaps it is due to an “anchoring bias” on their parts.  The ideology of the free market has become so firmly entrenched in their conceptual scheme that counterexamples do not touch it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            John Gray wrote <em>False Dawn </em>before the world-wide financial collapse of 2008. In it he warned of such events taking place as a result of globalization and free-market capitalism&#8211;world-wide financial cataclysms that exaggerate the cyclical booms and busts that are endemic to capitalism itself.  It is not that capitalism simply falls prey to crooked speculators as the Enron, WorldCom, and Adelphia scandals have demonstrated.  Instead, it is part of the fabric of capitalism itself, made worse by the global reach of free markets.  What is to be done to ameliorate these effects?  Gray is not sanguine about our economic futures.  A reversion to statism will not help, as witness the failures of the Soviet Union and of Maoism, which resulted in far more killings and human suffering than capitalism has, without any of the economic benefits.  Nor does Gray hold out much hope in trying to regulate markets, especially in the United States, which he sees as “…riven by class conflicts, fundamentalist movements, and low intensity race wars.” (p. 130). Only if Americans could admit that free markets are at odds with social stability might this conflict be moderated.  But Gray sees little hope for that.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            In a later work, <em>Straw Dogs:  Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals (2003)</em>, Gray makes an even stronger case for pessimism, not only about the future of capitalism, but also the human race.  His thesis here is that humans are what Darwin showed all animals to be, “…a result of blind evolutionary drift” (p. 5). But humans are worse than other animals by virtue of their capacity to cause untold pain and suffering to their fellow creatures.  The human species is <em>Homo Rapiens</em>, made even more fearsome by its development of technology to such an extent that it threatens the planet that has nurtured it.  Technology has taken on a life of its own, and, like global markets, it cannot be stopped.  Whether it can be harnessed for human wellbeing is, for Gray, a vain hope, given its widespread destructive use.  Perhaps when the human species has ceased to exist, the planet can begin to heal itself in the way that the Gaia Hypothesis contends.  This is the hypothesis that the earth is a self-regulating system; and, according to Gray, if humans disturb its delicate balance, they will be trampled and tossed aside like the straw dogs used in ancient Chinese rituals (p 34).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Whether, as Gray contends, hope for the future is just another illusion to which the human race is prone, or whether we can harness technology before we destroy ourselves, is still at issue.  Gray looks at our historical record and sees little hope, apparently distrusting the deliverances of reason and opting for quiescence in the face of necessity.  Perhaps, like Sisyphus, we are condemned to roll the stone uphill only to have it roll back again to the bottom.  But if we can learn to discern myth from reality, perhaps we can also learn something by exposing the myth.  Gray has shown the enormous productivity that can be generated by a  capitalistic system.  Perhaps, through selective regulation, such a system can be tamed so as to be responsive to human needs.  Although Gray has shown that human progress is not inevitable, he has not yet shown it to be impossible.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">            Time does not permit my proposing how such progress can be achieved, nor would it be an easy task because globalized capitalism, replete with its multi-national corporations, has become so convoluted that it is hard to unravel its many strands.  But that, as my friend Robert Schoch has suggested to me, itself proposes at least the form of a solution.  It does so by way of the Parable of the Zen Sculptor, in which the student approaches the master and asks, “How will the stone appear when finished?”  The master replies, “I cannot presently tell; but with each swing of the hammer and chisel, I can determine what it is not.”  Analogously, although we cannot presently tell what form our capitalism will take, we can at least discern what it will not be.  For instance, it will not be more <em>laissez faire</em>; it will not be more tax cuts for the wealthy; it will not be a “bail out” for failing banks without any supervision; it will not be the funding of defunct corporations so that their CEOs can escape with golden parachutes.  This we can determine because these things have been tried and they have failed to promote the general welfare.  Perhaps we can fashion our own brand of capitalism just by saying “no” at the right time.  At least it’s a start.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">L. S. Carrier</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">2 27 2009</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; line-height: 200%;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">(2)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">New Revolution for a New Imperialism</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">By: DI Editor, Dusty Schoch</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">I keep a picture of Che Guevara on the wall in front of me to remind myself that, like that ancient eastern sage said… “If you want to be beautiful, then be thou a lotus flower; If you would be strong, then be thou a mighty oak; but if your desire is to attain your own ultimate humanity, then thou must then be a revolutionary.” </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">That’s all Che ever was, even when he was living his “motorcycle diary” days. He left his native Argentina and led revolutionary resurgencies all over the world, recognizing even then (mid 50’s thru late 60’s) the global nature of “the” enemy – imperialism. To me, today, the root of imperialism is the multinational corporation (and the national corporations, as Halliburton and Blackwater, acting globally through a Pentagon controlled by multinational corporations…principals, agents…all the same.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Che wouldn’t—at least readily&#8211;know what to do today. The Batistas of today are seldom native tyrants and warlords, seldom visible. I might have selected a poor exemplar there because Batista was in a way a corporate puppet, if we can deem our native Mafia the equivalent of a multi-national corporation, which it’s always been in effect. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">That’s the why and where people like you fit in. It’s the philosophers (artistic historians) looking at the big picture of history and current events who must lead/inspire the masses to recognize the old villains in their new chameleonic embodiments and colorings by exposing the legerdemain and misdirections of the tricky corporate bastards running all the shows on all the economic stages and fronts; the fat cats who rake in the billions from their perches on palm islands off Dubai….regardless of the consequences occurring on the cutting edges of modern day capitalistic imperialism. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Imperialism, Che’s ubiquitous and perennial enemy, has always been capitalist, but in the past it was more corporeally capitalist. You could see and touch Batista and Iran’s Shah. In India, you could see and touch the British colonialists (capitalistic imperialists). They had flesh and blood and did their colonial thing out there in the open. When all the fat cats, with comic book efficiency, were enabled to incorporate, they were ipso facto enabled to act as though they were “invisible”. They are able to hire corporate mercenaries (e.g. Halliburton&gt;Blackwater) to do their dirty work and take the flak and fall by invisible proxy. Because they effectively are (invisible). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">My point? The “mythology” in which “free market capitalism” is all wrapped up and obfuscated is itself all wrapped up and obfuscated (thus insulated) by the macro-mythology of the transnational corporation. It’s a case of historically- nonpareil involute obliquity. The legal figment (myth) is the “invisible cloak” (image from an implement of wizardry found in Harry Potter’s school of magic) of corporate “being”. When a corporation becomes “de jure” (legally functional), its constituents (fat cat imperialists) become shielded by this cloak of invisibility, which enables them to act with total narcissistic self interest and without regard for the effect their actions will have on their country, countrymen or the oppressed peoples they enslave in the third world nations where their corporate cyborg exoskeletons export the onus of their industry’s labor. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Your provocative paper dwells on the mythology inherent in the microcosm of free market capitalism. It was my feeling on awakening that there could be drawn a powerful analogy (corollary to your thesis’ postulate) that it is the mythology in today’s macro capitalistic imperialist that must be contended with today…and that would be the transnational corporation. They are like the “octopus” which Che always used to characterize the imperialist monster (in the&#8211;ubiquitous&#8211;singular) of his day. When he went abroad to fight “the” monster, it didn’t seem to matter to Che where he found it. He led anti-imperialist insurgencies on every continent before he finally succumbed to the beast (our C.I.A. – led corporate counter-insurgency). It’s the same monster everywhere and this has not changed today. The monster is that tendency in man that makes him lethal to his fellow man and his earth when he is allowed to join and operate anonymously in a mob. The difficulty with today’s mobs is exponentially aggravated. The Batista’s of the world are now the Halliburtons. Another apt parallel – the insurgents who arise to resist the transnational imperialists (the Gaia “antibodies” or modern-day Che’s) are&#8211;enabled by modern technology&#8211; equally “stateless”, equally anonymous and invisible, and to the indigenous global populace, equally malignant in tendency and potential. These would be our invisible “terrorists”. We (our petro-pipeline corporate capitalists) created bin Laden and Al Qaeda intentionally in Afghanistan during its period of Soviet imperialism, and inadvertently every time we (through our corporate military complex) armed and allied Israel against her indigenous neighbors. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">I know this is somewhat a freely—associated flood of ideas, but that is evidently what your essay provoked in me that waited til today to assume shape. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">I noticed that your essay was principally expository. Nowhere do you propose a solution to the problems you surgically dissect and debride, so precisely and commendably&#8211;other than (with your Zen Sulptor parable)  listing what must be etched away from our present capitalistic monolith.  If there were time, you might consider what I have come to conclude: We in fact need a new revolutionary form (or leader) for a new (evolved) imperialistic beast. Free market capitalism is merely the means the transnational corporate imperialistic beasts “use”. Their end (exploitation of the weak for…capital) will never change…only their means and their appearance. We need to disinter Che and find a fiscal Dr. Frankenstein capable of revitalizing him in time to muster a following to challenge this brooding beast, before he has ravaged and warmed OUR globe to the terminal boiling point. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Best,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Dusty</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center; line-height: 200%;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">(3)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 26.25pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><strong><span style="font-family: Georgia; font-size: 24.0pt; color: black;">Thomas L. Friedman: There&#8217;s no magic bullet</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 8.5pt; color: #333333;"><img src="../images/clip_image001.gif" alt="" width="3" height="1" /></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: #FCFCFC;"><strong><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8.5pt; color: #2d648a;"><a href="http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi?query=By%20Thomas%20L.%20Friedman&amp;sort=publicationdate&amp;submit=Search"><span style="text-underline: none; color: #2d648a; text-decoration: none;">By Thomas L. Friedman</span></a></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 8.5pt; color: #333333;">Published: February 1, 2009</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 8.5pt; color: #333333;"><img src="../images/clip_image001_0000.gif" alt="" width="3" height="1" border="0" /></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;"><img src="../images/clip_image002.gif" alt="" width="123" height="2" border="0" /></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #2d648a;"><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/01/opinion/edfriedman.1-420079.php%20/# \ Click to view map"><span style="color: #2d648a; text-decoration: none;">DAVOS, Switzerland</span></a></span></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">:</span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;"> In its own unpredictable way, the Davos World Economic Forum usually serves as a crude barometer of the latest mood or mania on the world stage. This year did not disappoint. What has struck me is the quiet urgency that infused so many panel discussions and private conversations here between investors, politicians and social activists. To put it crudely: Everyone is looking for the guy &#8211; the guy who can tell you exactly what ails the world&#8217;s financial system, exactly how we get out of this mess and exactly what you should be doing to protect your savings.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">But here&#8217;s what&#8217;s really scary: The guy isn&#8217;t here. He&#8217;s left the building. Elvis has left the mountain. Get used to it.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">What do I mean? First, if it is not apparent to you yet, it will be soon: There is no magic bullet for this economic crisis, no magic bailout package, no magic stimulus. We have woven such a tangled financial mess with subprime mortgages wrapped in complex bonds and derivatives, pumped up with leverage, and then globalized to the far corners of the earth that, much as we want to think this will soon be over, that is highly unlikely.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">We are going to have to learn to live with a lot more uncertainty for a lot longer than our generation has ever experienced. We keep pouring money into the dark banking hole of this crisis, desperately hoping that we will hear it hit bottom and start to pile up. But so far, as hard as we listen, we can&#8217;t hear a thing. And so we keep pouring &#8230;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">A broker friend told me it reminded him of when he was a teenager and his doctor first diagnosed him as unable to digest wheat products.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">He said to the doctor, &#8220;Well, just give me a pill.&#8221; And the doctor told him: there is no pill. &#8220;You mean I&#8217;m just going to have to live with this?&#8221; he asked. That&#8217;s us. There is no pill &#8211; not for this mess.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">The fact that there is no single pill doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s nothing to be done. We need a stimulus big enough to create more jobs. We need to remove toxic assets from bank balance sheets. We need the U.S. Treasury to close the insolvent banks, merge the weak ones and strengthen the healthy few. And we need to do each one right. But even then, the turnaround will be neither quick nor painless. Indeed, the whispers here were that what has been an exclusively economic crisis up to now may soon morph into a domino of political crises &#8211; as happened in Iceland, where the bankruptcy of the banks toppled the government on Monday.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">(Davos humor: What is the capital of Iceland? Answer: $25.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">Second, we&#8217;re going to have to get used to a loss of trust. All those rock-solid people and institutions that we trusted with our money, our pensions and our kids&#8217; piggybank savings &#8211; like Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America &#8211; do not seem trustworthy anymore.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">Never before in my adult life have I looked around at every bank in my town and said, &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure I wouldn&#8217;t prefer to put my paycheck in a mattress.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">The Bernard Madoff scandal, of course, has only reinforced that loss of trust. His degree of betrayal &#8211; his alleged willingness to embezzle the life savings of people whom he had known his whole life &#8211; is so coldhearted that it charts new territory in human behavior. He&#8217;s on his way to becoming an adjective. Money managers are already being asked prove to prospective new clients that their internal safeguards are &#8220;Madoff proof.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">I&#8217;ve written a lot about the Indian outsourcing community, so I knew B. Ramalinga Raju, the Satyam chairman accused of embezzling $1 billion from his own company. What&#8217;s really sad is that I didn&#8217;t get to know him through his business but through an interest in his family&#8217;s charitable work. They created India&#8217;s first 911 emergency system in their home state and call centers in Indian villages, so young people there could get service jobs. Was all that a fake, too? Or was he just an embezzler with a good heart? Don&#8217;t know. When you can&#8217;t even trust a person&#8217;s charitable work, you&#8217;ve hit a new low.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">&#8220;We&#8217;re all going to have to learn to live with a lower level of trust in our lives,&#8221; an African banker friend said to me here. But the mind recoils at that, which may explain why so many people I talked to here are hoping that President Barack Obama will turn out to be the guy.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">Like Harry Truman, Obama is definitely present at the creation of something. He is arriving on the scene &#8220;not after a war but after the same kind of shattering of institutions that a war does,&#8221; said Peter Schwartz, chairman of the Global Business Network. &#8220;His job is to restore confidence to these institutions that have been at the foundation of our economy.&#8221;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; background: #FCFCFC;"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;">That may be Obama&#8217;s most important bailout task: to educate the country that there is no easy escape here, except taking our medicine, getting our fundamentals right again and working our way out of this, brick by brick, by getting back to making money &#8211; what was that old Smith Barney ad? &#8211; &#8220;the old-fashioned way&#8221; &#8211; by earning it.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">(4)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Creeping Corporate Capitalism -</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">The  </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">“Rand Syndrome”</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">(corollary to <strong>“The China Syndrome”</strong>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">By: Dusty Schoch, DI Foreign-Policy Editor  (<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: blue;"><a href="http://declaringindependents.com/">http://declaringindependents.com/</a></span></span><span style="color: navy;">)</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">With the sub-caption, <strong>“The China Syndrome</strong>” we allude to and invite you to review previous essays by Schoch (by using the “articles” link) on the topic of corporate America’s exporting jobs and industry to India and China. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">My previous postulate was this</span></span></strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">:  The China Syndrome (exporting America’s jobs and industry to China and other countries with “slave labor”) is exporting (destroying) America.  Corporate greed and governmental laissez-faire policies coincide to fuel the China Syndrome, with Enron and Halliburton scandals being only the top of the catastrophic ice berg. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> With the revelations that corporate-controlled Pentagon officials deceived us with false grounds for war (WMD’s etc) and further revelations that these same petro-munitions consortiums are guiding us to pursue our illegal conquest and occupation of Iraq, we saw Orwell’s nightmarish 1984 “fictional” forecast loom into actuality.  “Big brother” and the “big lies” were in fact being told the American public by a neo-con manipulated press (and, let’s concede it – a dreadfully dumbed-down American press and …America). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">My present postulate is this</span></span></strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">: Now the neo-cons are moving in for the final kill…that’s where (as Hitler burned the books in 1933) the neo-con corporate fat cat bullies are starting to change history.  Not literally by burning books this time, but rather by a much more subtle, sinister and insidious manner…by <strong>controlling (that means revising) </strong>what is taught in our universities. By starting the propaganda in full force with our sons and daughters as they enter the cusp of the job market…as they begin to take over the leadership of our society. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">If Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” became required reading at UNC Chapel Hill, would you be upset?  OK.  I’m telling you now, our University has now agreed to make required reading out of a book which I submit to you preaches a doctrine of capitalist fascism. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">The scoop is the subject of a well-written (by  Pam Kelley and Christina Rexrode) article appearing in the Charlotte Observer (March 23, 2008) available in full-print at this link: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; color: blue;"><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1010249.html" target="_blank">http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1010249.html</a></span></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> and will be printed below. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">Long story short</span></strong><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> – Fat cat neocon banker, John Allison, C.E.O. of BB &amp; T  has given the University of North Carolina a million dollars on the condition our students of the benefited universities read a book by Ayn Rand you may or may not have heard of entitled “Atlas Shrugged”.  <strong>Our (publicly-funded) University has agreed to the deal.</strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Ayn Rand is, for those out of this particular end of the neo-con loop, is a recently disinterred poster-child capitalistic “intellectual” who wrote some very popular fiction a half-century ago entitled “The Fountainhead” (also a movie) and “Atlas Shrugged”.  Both novels preached  the same essential socio-economic sermon, coined “enlightened selfishness”.  If Karl Marx and Lenin authored the “socialist” or “populist” end of the socio-economic spectrum of  Twentieth Century ideology , Ayn Rand founded its “individualist” polar opposite. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">The fat corporate cats of today are able and willing today to export America’s industry and jobs to foreign slave-labor (Indian and Chinese laborers earn the American equivalent of $30-$40 a month)  centers in order to skim the profits while our country is tossed towards its second depression because of its blind adherence to Randian philosophy – that our government should do nothing…absolutely nothing to stand in the way of either its citizens’ creativity or their (corporate) productivity. This philosophy of unrestrained corporate dominance has given us terminal  air and water pollution, global warming, war in Iraq and economic collapse.  And now, the fat cats want that philosophy added to the required reading of any student who attends business school in our university system. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Sound like  Hollywood mythology to you?  Don’t really think that Orwell’s 1984 scenario can really come true? Think again. Not only is it possible&#8211;our university staff and boards of trustees are going along with it. Wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that every member of our University Board of Trustees is a corporate fat cat him/her self, and probably a dedicated disciple of Ayn Rand since his own college days (when reading her sophomoric crap was optional). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Why “sophomoric crap”?  I’ll give you an example to illustrate.  I read “The Fountainhead” when I was 20. My very intellectual mother was a real devotee of Rand.  Rand is, if nothing else, a great story teller. But so’s Spephen King. You want Kujo’s creator ethically grooming your children? Back  in Rand’s day, corporations were a lot better behaved, I’ll say in my mother’s (and Rand’s)  defense. Back then, General Electric really did (occasionally) “bring better things to life”. Now the most important thing they bring to life is instant death (as the world’s largest supplier of nuclear warhead triggers); and by the way…GE has now exported (entirely) all its appliance service department to New Delhi.  If your stove or refrigerator goes on the blink – sorry; there aren’t any GE repairmen in the U.S. They’ve been “down-sized” (fired) and their jobs exported to India and China. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">This has happened because America is run by a government whose statesmen are on corporate payrolls (i.e., they don’t get elected without corporate campaign contributions, which is the same thing. The corporations get them elected; un-restricted corporate lobbyists then come straight to their (public) offices to collect the quid pro quo. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Now- back to the “example” (literary) in “<strong><em>The Fountainhead</em></strong>” that illustrates my designation of Randian Philosophy as morally bankrupt “sophomoric crap”.  The “<strong><em>Fountainhead’</em></strong>s” hero is an architect named Howard Roark.  He’s got the hots for the female protagonist, “Dominique Francon”.  She doesn’t immediately have the hots for him in return, so he does his laizzez-faire thing and rapes her.  She turns out liking it, but it was clearly rape being endorsed by this intellectually-pretentious excuse for the “great American novel” as the fat cat neo-cons call it.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">But that’s not where the corporate megalomania ends.   At the end of the book, Roark has designed and his client (big American city) has constructed a high-rise apartment complex for thousands of its middle class and  poor. Millions of public and private funds have been invested. But midway in construction, because of cost and other factors, some of Roark’s original blue prints were compromised. The residents wouldn’t each have a balcony where they could hang out flowers and sit in the sun.  Yes, this was a bad thing for the people and their visionary architect, but does Roark take them to court and make them fix what they’d done wrong? Nope. He torches the whole project. Yes sir; yes mam. His answer…and Rand’s philosophy is just that ego-centric and narcissistic.  If the government steps in the way of its artists or architects, the answer is…burn the place down. To the ground.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">In her novel, Ayn Rand makes Roark’s arson not only morally acceptable, but  heroic.  In the process, a nearly-complete habitat for thousands of the poor and middle class is torched because of the ego and pissed-off pride of a single man. Perhaps he was the original neo-con. Or perhaps  Ayn Rand herself was. In her other book, “Atlas Shrugged”, the business fat cats quit their noble narcissistic pursuits and there’s “hell to pay”.  Message – Do what the corporations say, or else. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Better watch out&#8212; Now&#8211; thanks to our fat cat corporate bankers&#8211;Ayn Rand is now required reading for your University of North Carolina student.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">Read the following article with the insight—and fright—I hope it engenders in you. Fascism has many faces. Unrestrained corporate-controlled plutarchy is one of them. </span></p>
</li>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=81</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALERT: America Launches War on Iran!</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=135</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=135#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DI  ALERT:   America Launches War on Iran!!! June 22, 2008   Israel’s military maneuvers + House Bill (H. CON. RES. 362) Calling for Blockade of Iran =  War. What to do: Read (all) the following and then call Washington &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=135">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=135" data-text="ALERT: America Launches War on Iran!" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D135&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 28.0pt; color: red;">DI  <br /> ALERT:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;">America Launches War on Iran!!!</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;">June 22, 2008</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 20.0pt; color: red;">Israel’s military maneuvers</span></span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 48.0pt; color: red;">+</span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span class="style254"><strong><span style="color: red;">House Bill</span> <span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: red;">H. CON. RES. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">362</span>)</span></strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 20.0pt;"><br /> <span style="color: red;">Calling for Blockade of Iran</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="style255" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="color: red;">=  </span> <span style="color: red;">War.</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt; color: red;">What to do: Read (all) the following and then call Washington and raise hell!!</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 48.0pt; color: red;">  </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="color: red;">Call House and Senate…And Pelosi<br /> The damn thing has a Senate counterpart.<br /> A  free Congressional switchboard number:</p>
<p> </span><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt; color: red;">1-866-340-9281</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>By: DI Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, with a PS from Leonard Carrier,</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>       DI In-House Historian and Philosopher.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: red;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="color: red;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> While Americans  and their media focus on Presidential Election, our fascist neocon leaders are again (as in 2004) </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">Wagging the Dog…</span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">to distract us from the true tale: War is Being Declared on Iran…and</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">we the people are doing nothing to stop it!!!</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">We recommend you read first this first “act of war” – what your Congress is about to do with its –again, pre-emptive and unilateral act of war in the Middle East…. The full proposed legislative bill is printed here…check out subparagraph (3) for the blockade provisions. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Then read the comments of Dusty and Len which follow. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13.5pt; color: maroon;">House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #111111;">America’s powerful pro-Israel lobby pressures the US Congress </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: #333333;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">by Andrew W Cheetham</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 9.0pt; color: black;"><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/"><span style="text-underline: none; color: navy; text-decoration: none;">Global Research</span></a>, June 18, 2008</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;"> </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">A US House of Representatives Resolution effectively requiring a naval blockade on Iran seems fast tracked for passage, gaining co-sponsors at a remarkable speed, but experts say the measures called for in the resolutions amount to an act of war. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">H.CON.RES 362 calls on the president to stop all shipments of refined petroleum products from reaching Iran. It also &#8220;demands&#8221; that the President impose &#8220;stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo entering or departing Iran.&#8221; </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">Analysts say that this would require a US naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">Since its introduction three weeks ago, the resolution has attracted 146 cosponsors. Forty-three members added their names to the bill in the past two days. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">In the Senate, a sister resolution S.RES 580 has gained co-sponsors with similar speed. The Senate measure was introduced by Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh on June 2. In little more than a week’s time, it has accrued 19 co-sponsors. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">AIPAC&#8217;s Endorsement</span></strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;"></p>
<p> Congressional insiders credit America’s powerful pro-Israel lobby for the rapid endorsement of the bills. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its annual policy conference June 2-4, in which it sent thousands of members to Capitol Hill to push for tougher measures against Iran. On its website, AIPAC endorses the resolutions as a way to &#8221;Stop Irans Nuclear Proliferation&#8221; and tells readers to lobby Congress to pass the bill. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">AIPAC has been ramping up the rhetoric against Iran over the last 3 years delivering 9 issue memos to Congress in 2006, 17 in 2007 and in the first five months of 2008 has delivered no less than 11 issue memos to the Congress and Senate predominantly warning of Irans nuclear weapons involvement and support for terrorism.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">The Resolutions put forward in the House and the Senate bear a resounding similarity to AIPAC analysis and Issue Memos in both its analysis and proposals even down to its individual components.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">Proponents say the resolutions advocate constructive steps toward reducing the threat posed by Iran. &#8220;It is my hope that…this Congress will urge this and future administrations to lead the world in economically isolating Iran in real and substantial ways,&#8221; said Congressman Mike Pence(R-IN), who is the original cosponsor of the House resolution along with Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Chairman of the sub committee on Middle East and South Asia of the Foreign Affairs Committee. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">Foreign policy analysts worry that such unilateral sanctions make it harder for the US to win the cooperation of the international community on a more effective multilateral effort. In his online blog, Senior Fellow in the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies Ethan Chorin points out that some US allies seek the economic ties to Iran that these resolutions ban. &#8220;The Swiss have recently signed an MOU with Iran on gas imports; the Omanis are close to a firm deal (also) on gas imports from Iran; a limited-services joint Iranian-European bank just opened a branch on Kish Island,&#8221; he writes. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">These resolutions could severely escalate US-Iran tensions, experts say. Recalling the perception of the naval blockade of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the international norms classifying a naval blockade an act of war, critics argue endorsement of these bills would signal US intentions of war with Iran. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">Last week’s sharp rise in the cost of oil following Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz’s threat to attack Iran indicated the impact that global fear of military action against Iran can have on the world petroleum market. It remains unclear if extensive congressional endorsement of these measures could have a similar effect. </span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;">In late May, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert reportedly urged the United States to impose a blockade on Iran. During a meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in Jersusalem, Olmert said economic sanctions have &#8220;exhausted themselves&#8221; and called a blockade a &#8220;good possibility.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.5pt; color: black;"> </span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" /></div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12.0pt;"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">ANNEX </p>
<p> Text of Proposed Resolution</span></strong></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;">HCON 362 IH</span></h3>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">110th CONGRESS</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">2d Session</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">H. CON. RES. 362</span></strong></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran&#8217;s pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">May 22, 2008</span></strong></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself and Mr. PENCE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">CONCURRENT RESOLUTION</span></strong></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran&#8217;s pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes.</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), has foresworn the acquisition of nuclear weapons by ratification of the NPT, and is legally bound to declare and place all its nuclear activity under constant monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA);</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas for nearly 20 years, in clear contravention of its explicit obligations under the NPT, Iran operated a covert nuclear program until it was revealed by an Iranian opposition group in 2002;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas the IAEA has confirmed such illicit covert nuclear activities as the importation of uranium hexafluoride, construction of a uranium enrichment facility, experimentation with plutonium, importation of centrifuge technology, construction of centrifuges, and importation of designs to convert highly enriched uranium gas into metal and shape it into the core of a nuclear weapon;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran continues to expand the number of centrifuges at its enrichment facility, as made evident by its announced intention to begin installation of 6,000 advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium, in defiance of binding United Nations Security Council resolutions demanding Iran suspend enrichment activities;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas the November 2007 National Intelligence Estimate reported that Iran was secretly working on the design and manufacture of a nuclear warhead until at least 2003, but that Iran could have enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon as soon as late 2009;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas an Iranian nuclear weapons capability would pose a grave threat to international peace and security by fundamentally altering and destabilizing the strategic balance in the Middle East, and severely undermining the global nonproliferation regime;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran&#8217;s overt sponsorship of several terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and its close ties to Syria raise the possibility that Iran would share its nuclear materials and technology with others;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran continues to develop ballistic missile technology and is pursuing the capability to field intercontinental ballistic missiles, a delivery system suited almost exclusively to nuclear weapons payloads;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iranian leaders have repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel, a major non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally, and a member of the United Nations;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany have offered, and continue to offer, to negotiate a significant package of economic, diplomatic, and security incentives if Iran complies with the United Nations Security Council&#8217;s resolutions demanding that Iran suspend uranium enrichment;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran has consistently refused such offers;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas as a result of Iran&#8217;s failure to comply with the mandates of the United Nations Security Council, taken under Chapter VII of the United Nations&#8217; Charter, the international community has imposed limited sanctions over the past 2 years that have begun to have an impact on the Iranian economy;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran&#8217;s rapid development of its nuclear capabilities is outpacing the slow ratcheting up of economic and diplomatic sanctions;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran has used its banking system, including the Central Bank of Iran, to support its proliferation efforts and its assistance to terrorist groups, leading the Department of Treasury to designate 4 large Iranian banks proliferators and supporters of terrorism;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran&#8217;s support for Hezbollah has enabled that group to wage war against the Government and people of Lebanon, leading to its political domination of that country;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran&#8217;s support for Hamas has enabled it to illegally seize control of Gaza from the Palestinian Authority, and to continuously bombard Israeli civilians with rockets and mortars;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran continues to provide training, weapons, and financial assistance to Shi&#8217;a militants inside of Iraq and antigovernment warlords in Afghanistan;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas those Shi&#8217;a militant groups and Afghan warlords use Iranian training, weapons, and financing to attack American and allied forces trying to support the legitimate Governments of Iraq and Afghanistan;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas Iran is further destabilizing the Middle East by underwriting a massive rearmament campaign by Syria;</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas through these efforts, Iran seeks to establish regional hegemony, threatens longstanding friends and allies of the United States in the Middle East, and endangers vital American national security interests; and</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Whereas nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran: Now, therefore, be it</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .5in;"><em><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),</span></em><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;"> That Congress&#8211;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .7in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(1) declares that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability, through all appropriate economic, political, and diplomatic means, is vital to the national security interests of the United States and must be dealt with urgently;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .7in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(2) urges the President, in the strongest of terms, to immediately use his existing authority to impose sanctions on&#8211;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .5;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(A) the Central Bank of Iran and any other Iranian bank engaged in proliferation activities or the support of terrorist groups;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .5;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(B) international banks which continue to conduct financial transactions with proscribed Iranian banks;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .5;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(C) energy companies that have invested $20,000,000 or more in the Iranian petroleum or natural gas sector in any given year since the enactment of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996; and</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .5;"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(D) all companies which continue to do business with Iran&#8217;s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .7in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(3) demands that the President initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran&#8217;s nuclear program; and</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: .7in;" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;">(4) urges the President to lead a sustained, serious, and forceful effort at regional diplomacy to support the legitimate governments in the region against Iranian efforts to destabilize them, to reassure our friends and allies that the United States supports them in their resistance to Iranian efforts at hegemony, and to make clear to the Government of Iran that the United States will protect America&#8217;s vital national security interests in the Middle East.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">For links to and in this on-line article click <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=9377" target="_blank">here</a>:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal style212"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">DUSTY’S COMMENTS:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>You say you’ve read your paper’s headlines today (June 22, 2008) and you don’t find anything like the caption to this article?  You ask what prompts me to say America has begun its attack on Iran?  I’ll give you the short and the long of it. The short first:  Your newspaper today DID contain the AP release that the Khaleej Times (government-owned newspaper in Dubai [United Arab Emirates]) is calling the Israel military maneuvers of the past week what they are – a patent  precursor to bombing Iran. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>In case you haven’t noticed it, since 1948, we are Israel’s political and  military ally. Israel for all practical purposes is us. When Israel attacks Iran’s nuclear facilities, it will be Israel and the U.S. who take the heat for it. That’s, after all, what bin Laden has said, time and time again, was  the reason (his own motivation)  for 9/11—America’s alliance with Israel.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>Now for the long part—the less obvious logic. Consider first an analogy that we’re all familiar with – because of having been children:  The school-yard bully always has an entourage of weaker “tag-alongs ”.  These weaker, flunkie,  tag-alongs are the bully’s “mob” and moral support. They are also, most often, the ones who provoke the fights the bully gets involved in. Sometimes the bully has the tag-along communicate the threat and start the fight, but most often the tag-along starts things for his own self-aggrandizing  reasons.  The tag-along would be afraid to start a fight without the bully around for obvious reasons – he’d get his butt whipped without the bully either backing him or fighting the fight the flunky instigates.  So it’s normally the flunky’s mouth, his threats and his  “first stones” that commence the fights in the school yards of out past, and more alarmingly, in the foreign theaters of our current wars. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>Without 50 years of military support on America’s part, there would be no Israel. American Jews financed the war in 1948 and today adopt and subsidize select Zionist Israeli military warriors who propound and execute Israel’s bully policies in Palestine and the settlements in Gaza.  Israel is America’s flunky in this festering war in the Middle East, and America is the world-perceived, world-class bully to blame. </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>America’s neo-con-machinated invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were clearly the product of a war plan conceived by Zionists Jews and passed to their bully partner since the birth of the Israeli nation in 1948.  Students of the so-called “American War on Terror” know the war is simply the execution of a plan for Middle Eastern restructuring written (although its theologic roots are in the Old Testament promise of “promised land” to  God’s “chosen”, i.e. the Jews) in that 1998 declaration entitled “A Clean Break”.  To review this history, all the reader need do is Google “A Clean Break”, and “PNAC” + “Statement  of Principles”, or simply click on and read the “Free Book” on American Fascism linked on the home page of this website.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>If you study how the war on Iraq was arranged, you’ll understand how the war on Iran is being constructed. It’s all the same plan, and it’s happening exactly in the same way – (1) Scare Americans into believing a given country is harboring terrorists who want us dead, and (2) make us believe those terrorists are building …you guessed it, “weapons of mass destruction” to kill us with.  How many times can you fool the same people with the same lie?  Was Lincoln right? Can you fool some of the people all of the time?  Have we become that kind of people?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>For a November, 2007 prediction of this moment in time, simply click on the article we posted back then when it became apparent that Bush was planning a war with Iran with the same stealth he pulled of his invasion of Iraq while we thought we were assembling troops in the Middle East to fight terrorists in Afghanistan…in at least the vicinity of those calling themselves “al Qaeda”.  <a href="http://democratswrite.com/the_democratic_opinion/page340.htm" target="_blank">Check out what we pointed out to  you on this before.</a> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>It’s been a ruse all the time and it remains a ruse. By “ruse” I mean – “misdirection”—the same thing a magician uses on stage when he does something with a flurry with his left hand to prevent you from noticing his reaching for the rabbit with his right.  </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>Right about now, Bush and the Zionist-Jew-Christian-Crazy armageddonites are asking you to look at Israel as if Israeli Prime Minister Olmert is acting autonomously when his air force is carrying out menacing maneuvers clearly intended to be taken by Iran as a promise of being bombed if they continue with their Nuclear power plans.  The U.S. has its military back turned claiming we (the U.S.) is seeking “diplomatic” resolution. Sure, Condi, we believe you this time. Fool me once shame on …..  (now how was it Bush finished that aphorism?!)</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>In Dubai, our former allies in the oil business are quite accurately saying that an attack on Iran will have “disastrous consequences for the region”.  America, through Bush, Condi and the other lying neo-cons is denying any complicity with their flunkie , tag-along wannabee big bully in the Middle East. But in truth, America and Israel are, behind the closed doors of the Pentagon, one. And the whole world knows it. If America is going to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites, I wouldn’t be half so disturbed if (1) they would tell the truth about it and (2) get our Congress to agree to it.  Aren’t you with me on this? Aren’t you a little tired of being lied to by our leadership…especially on our way to war…where they give the word and our sons and daughters give the blood?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong>DW readers….unite. Send this message to every thinker you know. Hit the following link and demand that your congressmen preempt this cowardly  preemptive declaration of war by the American bully by and through the actions of its military flunkie puppet  state in the Middle East.  It is they who will launch the battle, but it is we who will die because of it.  Just ask the 10,000 + parents of dead American soldiers.  Hit and fill the following linked message to let your agents in Washington know that you know what Bush is doing with both hands.  Don’t let the big bully blame the war on the little bully. Without both, working together, there would be no war in Iraq.  With both working together, there will be war in Iran. How many times do we want to be fooled?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1439/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=18878" target="_blank">Click here to read.</a></strong></p>
<p class="style131" style="text-align: justify;" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">Len Carrier’s Post Script </span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Dusty,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">If we want to see oil go to $200 a barrel, all the Bush Administration has to do is give Israel the green light to bomb Iran.  Then the Iranians will block the straits of Hormuz, and nobody here will be able to buy gasoline under $6.00 per gallon.  Then Bush, in the last throes of his presidency, will demand that we give oil companies permits to drill in the last few vestiges of our national heritage.  Of course, this won&#8217;t help bring gasoline prices down at all, but it might scare our chicken-hearted representatives in Congress to go along with Bush-Cheney&#8217;s final attempt to steal another country&#8217;s oil.  Bush, Cheney,  and their oily friends will profit in any case.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Then we&#8217;ll have a push for all-out war with Iran, because our &#8220;national interest &#8220;demands it. Our Air Force, itching to bomb another country into oblivion, will be willing to send our bombers over Teheran, and the neocons will rejoice in yet another bite of the apple, another chance to &#8220;democratize&#8221; a foreign country against its will.  What  follows will be a replay of Iraq, where &#8220;mistakes will have been made,&#8221; all in the name of trying to turn Iran into a vassal of our capitalistic society.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">If all this happens, John McCain, that war-mongering, damaged piece of detritus left over from Vietnam, will claim his patriotic right to be President in the time of war.  The American public, gullible as ever, will fall for this line of jingoistic ravings and elect him so that we can have at least four more years of killing, borrowing, and the ruination of our American Republic.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">I wish all this were only a nightmare. Recent exercises of the Israeli Air Force tell me that it might actually happen.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Len</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></span></strong></p>
<p class="style255" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<th scope="col" valign="top" width="45%">
<p class="style231" style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size: 28.0pt; color: red;">DI CALL<br /> TO ACTION:</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><br /> STOP WHAT YOU ARE<br /> DOING AND HELP US</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">ABORT ANOTHER OF  BUSH’S ILLIGITIMATE  PREEMPTIVE WARS</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">OPPOSE Senate Resolution  580 and </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 14.0pt;">House: H Con. Res.  363</span></strong></p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">This just in from <strong>Dan Stone</strong>, DW affiliate and correspondent from California, founder and editor of the on-line news letter “Justice Freedom”:    June 26, 2008:</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Dear All,</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">I called the offices of Representatives Jesse Jackson, Jr., Robert Wexler, and Henry Waxman, and the latter two said the Representagives had co-sponsored H CON RES 362 because it was non-binding, and required diplomacy, not force. These people are sleep-walking into another attack!!</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">If passed, this Resolution (with the Senate concurring as per SEN RES 580) would constitute approval of the American people (via congress) of a naval blockade against Iran. What are the chances Cheney and Bush will take this approval and run with it !?!?! This naval blockade&#8211;an act of war&#8211;would be the first actual step toward an attack on Iran. It would bring the united states into the &#8220;fog of war&#8221; in which Cheney / Bush would be able to ramp up their actions against Iran and duplicate the scenario as with Iraq, with the U.S. as the aggressor, Iran the victim, and the Congress and the American people the enablers. Remember how we just invaded Iraq, no shots fired by them, no provocation, no nothing. We just went in. Now is the time to stop this aggressive process.</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">See the wording of H CON RES 362 below to read the part which could be used to mount a naval blockade, the first step toward an attack. In Item #3 (toward the end), it states:  “<strong><em>prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran&#8217;s nuclear program</em></strong>;&#8221;  This is the language of naval blockade, which is the language of war.</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Please contact your Reps and Senators to urge them to oppose these 2 War Resolutions.</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">- Dan</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">***************************</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify"><a href="http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=9377" target="_blank">Click here for reference.</a></p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">ANNEX </p>
<p> Text of Proposed Resolution</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">HCON 362 IH</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">110th CONGRESS</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">2d Session</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">H. CON. RES. 362</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran&#8217;s pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes.</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">May 22, 2008</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself and Mr. PENCE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="text-align: center;" align="justify">CONCURRENT RESOLUTION</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed to international peace, stability in the Middle East, and the vital national security interests of the United States by Iran&#8217;s pursuit of nuclear weapons and regional hegemony, and for other purposes.</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), has foresworn the acquisition of nuclear weapons by ratification of the NPT, and is legally bound to declare and place all its nuclear activity under constant monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA);</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas for nearly 20 years, in clear contravention of its explicit obligations under the NPT, Iran operated a covert nuclear program until it was revealed by an Iranian opposition group in 2002;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas the IAEA has confirmed such illicit covert nuclear activities as the importation of uranium hexafluoride, construction of a uranium enrichment facility, experimentation with plutonium, importation of centrifuge technology, construction of centrifuges, and importation of designs to convert highly enriched uranium gas into metal and shape it into the core of a nuclear weapon;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran continues to expand the number of centrifuges at its enrichment facility, as made evident by its announced intention to begin installation of 6,000 advanced centrifuges to enrich uranium, in defiance of binding United Nations Security Council resolutions demanding Iran suspend enrichment activities;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas the November 2007 National Intelligence Estimate reported that Iran was secretly working on the design and manufacture of a nuclear warhead until at least 2003, but that Iran could have enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon as soon as late 2009;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas an Iranian nuclear weapons capability would pose a grave threat to international peace and security by fundamentally altering and destabilizing the strategic balance in the Middle East, and severely undermining the global nonproliferation regime;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran&#8217;s overt sponsorship of several terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and its close ties to Syria raise the possibility that Iran would share its nuclear materials and technology with others;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran continues to develop ballistic missile technology and is pursuing the capability to field intercontinental ballistic missiles, a delivery system suited almost exclusively to nuclear weapons payloads;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iranian leaders have repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel, a major non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally, and a member of the United Nations;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany have offered, and continue to offer, to negotiate a significant package of economic, diplomatic, and security incentives if Iran complies with the United Nations Security Council&#8217;s resolutions demanding that Iran suspend uranium enrichment;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran has consistently refused such offers;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas as a result of Iran&#8217;s failure to comply with the mandates of the United Nations Security Council, taken under Chapter VII of the United Nations&#8217; Charter, the international community has imposed limited sanctions over the past 2 years that have begun to have an impact on the Iranian economy;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran&#8217;s rapid development of its nuclear capabilities is outpacing the slow ratcheting up of economic and diplomatic sanctions;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran has used its banking system, including the Central Bank of Iran, to support its proliferation efforts and its assistance to terrorist groups, leading the Department of Treasury to designate 4 large Iranian banks proliferators and supporters of terrorism;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran&#8217;s support for Hezbollah has enabled that group to wage war against the Government and people of Lebanon, leading to its political domination of that country;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran&#8217;s support for Hamas has enabled it to illegally seize control of Gaza from the Palestinian Authority, and to continuously bombard Israeli civilians with rockets and mortars;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran continues to provide training, weapons, and financial assistance to Shi&#8217;a militants inside of Iraq and antigovernment warlords in Afghanistan;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas those Shi&#8217;a militant groups and Afghan warlords use Iranian training, weapons, and financing to attack American and allied forces trying to support the legitimate Governments of Iraq and Afghanistan;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas Iran is further destabilizing the Middle East by underwriting a massive rearmament campaign by Syria;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas through these efforts, Iran seeks to establish regional hegemony, threatens longstanding friends and allies of the United States in the Middle East, and endangers vital American national security interests; and</p>
<p class="style25 style243" align="justify">Whereas nothing in this resolution shall be construed as an authorization of the use of force against Iran: Now, therefore, be it</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .5in;" align="justify">Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress&#8211;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .5;" align="justify">(1) declares that preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability, through all appropriate economic, political, and diplomatic means, is vital to the national security interests of the United States and must be dealt with urgently;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .5;" align="justify">(2) urges the President, in the strongest of terms, to immediately use his existing authority to impose sanctions on&#8211;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .3in;" align="justify">(A) the Central Bank of Iran and any other Iranian bank engaged in proliferation activities or the support of terrorist groups;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .3in;" align="justify">(B) international banks which continue to conduct financial transactions with proscribed Iranian banks;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .3in;" align="justify">(C) energy companies that have invested $20,000,000 or more in the Iranian petroleum or natural gas sector in any given year since the enactment of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996; and</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .3in;" align="justify">(D) all companies which continue to do business with Iran&#8217;s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps;</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .5;" align="justify">(3) demands that the President initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, <strong>prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran&#8217;s nuclear program;</strong> and</p>
<p class="style25 style243" style="margin-left: .5;" align="justify">(4) urges the President to lead a sustained, serious, and forceful effort at regional diplomacy to support the legitimate governments in the region against Iranian efforts to destabilize them, to reassure our friends and allies that the United States supports them in their resistance to Iranian efforts at hegemony, and to make clear to the Government of Iran that the United States will protect America&#8217;s vital national security interests in the Middle East.</p>
</th>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=135</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father&#8217;s Day Dreaming</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=142</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=142#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Father’s Day Dreaming   An Open Letter to My Son, Demian June 15, 2008   By: DI Foreign Policy Editor, Robert Rodes (Dusty) Schoch    (With Trailing Contributions from Virginia Attorney, Mike Murphy and Notre Dame Law Professor Robert E. &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=142">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=142" data-text="Father&#8217;s Day Dreaming" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D142&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;">Father’s Day Dreaming</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">An Open Letter to My Son, Demian</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">June 15, 2008</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">By: DI Foreign Policy Editor, Robert Rodes (Dusty) Schoch</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> (With Trailing Contributions from</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">Virginia Attorney, Mike Murphy and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center">Notre Dame Law Professor Robert E. Rodes III)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">I woke up today and made a mistake. I read the newspaper. It was supposed to be a day of quiet celebration for us …as fathers. But, reading the paper made me question whether I made a mistake 35-years ago helping to bring a child into this world…this world crumbling around me.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Don’t get me wrong – I hated that Armageddon story when I read it the first time – in the Bible’s “Revelations”.  But I suspect the author of that work was more than a little mad. He described seeing “visions” of things that clearly weren’t there.  What I’m dealing with this morning are visions of what IS.  I made the mistake of reading the news. With the paper now in the recycling bin, let me share with you my concerns with what … stuck – this Sunday, June 15, 2008:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">A metaphorical image for what I see in the news today is America in the form of its prior NY Twin Towers – right at the moment the news casters showed us pictures of flames in the first tower. Because I know now what happened next back on 9/11, 2001, I see America now itself as those Twin Towers. The North tower in my metaphoric vision stands for American industry, and the South for its soul (it’s morality).  One is on fire and soon both will be, and soon thereafter both will come crashing to the ground. It’s not going to be slow, like with Rome. It’s going to be faster than anything that’s ever happened to the world’s strongest nation in any point in history.  The speed is evident in everything I saw today in the news.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">I won’t give the stories in any preconceived or rationally-constructed sequence. I want my Father’s Day stream of consciousness simply to flow. Foremost in my newly-downloaded dad’s databank, is the picture of our bully President Bush, in the company of cohorts from Russia, France, Germany and even China plotting a war with Iran wholly oblivious of the fact they are simply kindling evil and danger by embodying evil and danger.  Of course Iran has just as much right to play with uranium as the already-nuke nations. Of course the mob of the strong justifies its bullying by conjuring the word “evil” to describe the weaker outsider (non-nuclear nation).  We already have 7 irresponsible nations armed with nuclear arsenals and yet are more concerned with proliferation than elimination. We want to secure our positions among the self-selected bullies with permission to walk about in the nuclear neighborhood.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Next I see our second largest brewery fixing to sell itself to Bavaria—casting thousands more American bread-winners into future bread lines.  Miller already belongs to England; so why shouldn’t Bud join the industrial bailout of America’s toppling twin towers. The twin towers epitomized, housed and  embodied American corporate industrial might. Since 9/11 I have watched the fat-cat corporate mongols (I used to honor them with “mogul” monikers, but they are clearly today’s barbarians…this time storming OUT of the gates to the city they set on fire) export its workers’ jobs to slave-driven third-world nations while “we the people” sit blithely by, condoning the treason by buying the exported product at Wallymart , a.k.a. The China Store. No more furniture made in High Point where furniture in America was born and raised. No more electronic hardware made in California’s silicon valley where it was conceived and fostered.  The North Tower of America – its industrial core is now pretty much up in flames; the fat cats of industry who are exporting her piecemeal to China and India are moving into new digs in the new global gangster hole in the Middle Eastern wall… a little vacation spot for escapee global billionaires called Dubai. A few feet off the coast of Dubai you’ll find them in an Arab-fabricated little archipelago called “The World”&#8211;the brave new world of the bandits who sold America and escaped to their new “water world”. The parallels in this and the  apocalyptic Costner movie are creepy scary.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">As for America’s South tower…its morality…the newspaper was even more pregnant with pictures of flames that will fuel the on-coming collapse. In the midst of our oil crisis, our mortgage foreclosure crisis (one-tenth of our population will suffer the loss of their homes under the collapse of the mortgage bubble’s bursting), we still have featured in the auto section of our news a big spread on Mercedez Benz’ newest gas guzzler that gets 12 MPG and makes up for it by paying a “gas guzzler’s surtax” that puts money back into the tills of a government (America’s) more concerned with corporate profits than saving the Earth from globally-warmed extinction.  Shame on the corporate-owned newspapers that publish for profit that fat-cat car obscenity.  But how can there be “morality” without some vestige of intelligence?  The “conservative” pundit in my paper’s news today is blaming the whole problem of gas prices on liberals who keep Exxon-Mobile from drilling for more oil off our North Carolina shores.  As if more oil is  going to save us…when it was oil that motivated the toppling of the twin towers and literally oil that exploded them, and oil that is pumped and burned by 6 billion of us to the end that when the twin towers of America’s industry and soul are finally flush upon Earth’s ground zero, it will probably be curtain calling time not only for the world’s formerly foremost nation but for the world itself.  It is we who today say “yes” “yes” Yes!” to pornographic and sadistic reality TV in lieu of art; it is we who say yes to a leadership which has said no to earth-saving Kyoto protocols; It is we who have not insisted on the impeachment for the greatest candidate since Hitler for the moniker of “Anti-Christ”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">My father’s day ruminations were/are the result of my concern for the future of my 35-year old son who this morning came in and gave me a hug for having taken part in bringing him forth to this day.  I will probably be here when the twin towers of America’s former industry and morality resoundingly reach ground zero. That’s going to happen faster than anyone can imagine. The only reason our present stage of economic depression isn’t declared is that we’re living in a state of denial pretty much identical to the one we were in when we were gazing at the flames in both the North and South towers in NY  wondering how long it would take the NY firemen to put them out.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">These fires I’ve cited in the news paper today aren’t going to be put out. America has allowed its corporate fat cats to sell its industrial heart to foreign slave traders; America has allowed its fear and greed to sell its soul to those who would invade nations and kill hundreds of thousands of people to preserve a status quo that puts America’s commercial interests and aspirations above the priority of preserving life on earth…the only life we know for sure exists in this universe of ours.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">I wish my little sojourn into global circumspection this day might have ended on a happier note. I’m constrained to borrow my concluding surmise from Robert Frost –</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 9.0pt; color: black;">Some say the world will end in fire; <br /> Some say in ice. <br /> From what I&#8217;ve tasted of desire <br /> I hold with those who favor fire. <br /> But if it had to perish twice, <br /> I think I know enough of hate <br /> To know that for destruction ice <br /> Is also great <br /> And would suffice.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">By the way, Demian, my son: Thanks for the hug. I really needed it. I wish only I could be here when you’re 65 to return it, because I know you’ll be needing it  then much more than I now. So know now I’ll be thinking of you then, and if Einstein was right about the warping of time and space, you will still be feeling that hug if between now and then you’ve managed, as I know you will, to have hung on to your soul. It’s going to be a hell of a ride for you because of the choices made by your ancestors in their handling and husbandry of your earth.  And as clear as we can see the tsunami’s, tornadoes and apocalyptic horses  heading our way, it’s clear that there’s never a time to abandon either hope or your pursuit of happiness.  I wish I could give you a map to help you steer around the hurdles and pitfalls of your future. But at this point, I can only give you this, as a father’s day ray of hope:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">    </span>God has given us both a map and a compass to guide us. The map is the design and fabric of the earth and the universe beyond. The compass is the heart. The heart beats with the pulse of all life.  Our minds are free to choose the roads we take on our journey of life, and if we keep and follow the compass, it will be a good trip. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Love, Dad.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Michael K. Murphy</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">DI Contributor and Virginia Attorney</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Comments: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dusty:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">    I imagine that as 300 A.D. slid toward the 400s there were certain to be some Roman fathers who must have sat quietly with their thoughts outside their homes on many a warm summer&#8217;s evening, a glass of wine to sip and a bowl of olives and a bit of bread to pick at by their sides as warm Mediterranean breezes stirred their thoughts while their wives and children readied themselves for the night inside, secure for the moment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">    These fathers felt a powerful connection to the past greatness of the Roman Republic &#8212; as they were its natural and lineal heirs and as their children would be; yet they had become only mute witnesses to Rome&#8217;s evident decline from the legitimacy that the Republic had conferred upon Rome while the Republic was still alive.  Now, many years after the Empire had supplanted the Republic, the internal decay that the Empire brought would be evident, not at first, not for many years, but by now.  Maybe not all understood what was happening, but certainly some did; some could see very clearly that Rome&#8217;s days of glory and legitimacy had passed and what was left of it were only the old forms in society and government, for example, that many would desperately cling to for security.  Others, these men, would just sip their evening wine and pick at some food and smell the warm air off the Sea and dream of what might have been for their children but which they could no longer give them.   </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Professor (of Law) Robert E. Rodes III</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">University of Notre Dame</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">(and Dusty’s esteemed cousin)</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Conclude Dusty’s Father’s Day Lament with</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Some back and forth discussion about </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">History and current events. </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">(Professor Rodes in <span style="color: blue;">Blue</span>, Dusty in <span style="color: red;">red)</span> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: blue;">Dusty: </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: blue;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;">Thanks for this. It is a pleasure to find you still fighting the good fight. But it came just after the Supreme Court Guantanamo case, so I see rather more glimmers of hope than you seem to. Indignation is simple, and rightly so, but history is complicated.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;"> </span><span style="color: red;">I am simply indignant with that which is about to become history. History is complicated by the same process that makes religion subject to dogmatic debate: the myopias and dysgraphias of men as observers and reporters. With Guantanamo,</span><span style="color: red;">little and late beats nothing at all. I concede it. But in the case of Guantanamo’s belated judicial scrutiny – it soothes me solely with the relief I feel when I cease smashing my toe with a hammer. Those poor souls have been in our torture chambers the better part of a decade. A decade of immutable and historically iconic disgrace. If all nine Justices drank world-transcending cool-aide  on the Supreme Court steps in a ritual show of collective American judicial contrition, I believe the scales of justice might tip again towards the horizontal.   </span><span style="color: blue;">  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;">When your son was born 35 years ago, did you think you would live to see the end of apartheid in South Africa?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: red;">I did in fact, because I’d been to school and confidently debated the issue with sons of Africaners. All slaves eventually find freedom because their state is the most unnatural. What I didn’t expect is what I have since found – i.e. that the sequelae of that disease of disparities is—at least for an evolutionary period of adjustment&#8211; more malignant that the disease. But most healings come with crises. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: red;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;">Did I think I would live to see a black Catholic priest presiding over an all white congregation in the middle of Tennessee?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: blue;">A book just surfaced in our motley collection, The Proud Tower, by Barbara Tuchman, which I hadn&#8217;t looked at for many years. It&#8217;s about the period from 1890 to the First World War. Things were bad then too. There were terrorist incidents then too. The suspects weren&#8217;t imprisoned; they were hanged. The fat cat industrialists didn&#8217;t outsource their work to cheap labor abroad; they kept a supply of cheap labor at home by busting unions. We fought a war with rather less justification than this one, and involved ourselves in a  similar fight to make the spoils safe for American business.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal style253" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="style253" style="text-align: justify;">Our history as invasive genocidal self-righteous raiders of the lost arc of God began at Plymouth Rock, and at the same time I assert such, I salute you for your more moderate appreciation of the yin/yang  flow of everything. I suppose I’m simply “stuck” with the belief that our oscillations from yin to yang are now (with corporately-connived denials and continuities in globally-warming policy) are a quantum leap ahead of what has gone before. Before either of us were fathers, the nation’s # 1 sage said quite accurately, “Everybody talks about the weather but no one DOES anything about it.”  Twain would be blushing at his own shortsightedness. We were steaming down and ecologically damning rivers even in his day. But there were no corporations capable of dictating the global execution of their dollar-driven ethic/policy. Every civilization’s wealth has been derived from slavery. Plus ca change. What I rue is the death/dearth of America as a beacon/paradigm/template/model of perceived “good”. My father’s day lament was more for the loss of my country as a world lantern in the new dark age of environmental and economic Armageddon.  When the Euro and the crude barrel jointly displace the Dollar, the axis of the world will likely spin from eccentric to chaotic.  The “big brother” defender of the downtrodden and bullied is now the worst bully on the block. There’s nothing (quantitatively) like our taking over 660,000 Iraqi civilian lives in America’s history from Columbus. There were veritable villains in WWI. We were both victims and perps in the Civil War, saviors in WWII, justifiably (?) red scared in Korea and Nam, but without excuse…or even the pretense of it in Iraq. And an infinitely more circumspect and savy world knows it. And the world will never forget. And if we are able to get “philosophical” about having waged unprovoked wars of unadulterated acquisition and  aggression, we are building up momentum for another holocaust and justifying—in fascistic style&#8211; the first one in the process.  The dream of America as big-brother guardian of the meek and friend of the Earth is no more. It’s time for America to declare peace and mea culpa so that the healing process can begin. Scarred forever, we could confess, recover and make amends. Am I far off when I characterize the bottom line of your position as…”We’ve been bad before so… what’s the harm of  a little reprise of a perennial play” ?  Bob, I simply can’t get out of my own mind the historic fact that Hitler’s seminal battle cry was “Onward, Christian soldiers”. The Vatican has to this day never withdrawn its concordance with that proclamation. My fright on that account is revived today by the fundamentalist Christian Right currently continuing to condone the Bush war in Iraq as divine mission. When minds such as yours find philosophical (or theological) solace for our current sins in our past sins, my fright soars into a jet stream of awfulness. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal style231 style253" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal style231 style253" style="text-align: center;" align="center">Happy Father’s Day…to all.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=142</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth About Oil Prices</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=147</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE TRUTH ABOUT OIL PRICES:     The debate is like that  tale told by an idiot-  full of “Sound and Fury” and signifying nothing.   The Answer is still “Blowing in the Wind”   Intro:  In the following article, &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=147">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=147" data-text="The Truth About Oil Prices" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D147&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">THE TRUTH ABOUT OIL PRICES:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><a href="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/gas_prices.jpg"><img src="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/gas_prices.jpg" alt="gas prices" title="gas_prices" width="281" height="92" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-148" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">The debate is like that  tale told by an idiot-</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> full of “Sound and Fury” and signifying nothing. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">The Answer is still “Blowing in the Wind”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Intro:  </span><span style="font-family: Arial; color: navy;">In the following article, DI Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, and Staff Writer, Len Carrier, respond to DI’s In-House Neo-Conservative Republican Atlanta contributor and writer,  Foster Musgrove  regarding the price of oil. Foster has forwarded for our consideration an article captioned “The Truth About Oil Prices” as derived from recent debates in the Senate’s Judiciary Committee between Democrats and Republicans on the subject of oil prices in America.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; color: navy;">Foster Musgrove, on forwarding the (obviously Republican-spun reporting on the debate) offers: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">“Heard this morning that gas is now $4/gal.  It is good that you have a sail boat and that the Government has not yet figured out how to tax the wind. I don&#8217;t know this guy, but it is interesting reading.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="style25" align="center">DUSTY’S DISSENT (AN OPEN LETTER<br /> TO FOSTER MUSGROVE) and LEN CARRIER’S<br /> “CLINCHERS” TRAIL THE<br /> FOLLOWING REPUBLICANS’ REPORTING</p>
<p class="style25">&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8211;<br /> From: &lt;krwark@primusonline.com.au<br /> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 9:12 PM<br /> Subject: FW: Fwd: Fw: THE TRUTH ABOUT OIL PRICES</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">It is interesting to have some reliable statistics and facts on the &#8216;Oil Industry&#8217; who currently seem to be the party all Governments and consumers wish to blame for high Oil prices. Although the following pertains to the USA, some of the info is global, and there is a parallel in Australia, the difference being significantly higher government excise, tax and GST take. I know I am biased on this issue, however this info will provide a starting point for the next time I am asked for an explanation on &#8216;Oil Pricing&#8217;.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Kerry</p>
<p class="style25">May 21, 2008</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Oil Executives Try to Educate Senate Democrats, But Democrats Appear Hopeless.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Earlier today, the Senate Judiciary Committee summoned top executives from the petroleum industry for what Chairman Pat Leahy thought would be a politically profitable inquisition. Leahy and his comrades showed up ready to blame American oil companies for the high price of gasoline, but the event wasn&#8217;t as satisfactory as the Democrats had hoped.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">The industry lineup was formidable: Robert Malone, Chairman and President of BP America, Inc.; John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Company; Peter Robertson, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chevron Corporation; John Lowe, Executive Vice President, Conoco Philips Company; and Stephen Simon, Senior Vice President, Exxon Mobil Corporation. Not surprisingly, the petroleum executives stole the show, as they were far smarter, infinitely better informed, and much more public-spirited than the Senate Democrats.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">One theme that emerged from the hearing was the surprisingly small role played by American oil companies in the global petroleum market. John Lowe pointed out:</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">I cannot overemphasize the access issue. Access to resources is severely restricted in the United States and abroad, and the American oil industry must compete with national oil companies who are often much larger and have the support of their governments.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">We can only compete directly for 7 percent of the world&#8217;s available reserves while about 75 percent is completely controlled by national oil companies and is not accessible.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Stephen Simon amplified:</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Exxon Mobil is the largest U.S. oil and gas company, but we account for only 2 percent of global energy production, only 3 percent of global oil production, only 6 percent of global refining capacity, and only 1 percent of global petroleum reserves. With respect to petroleum reserves, we rank 14th. Government-owned national oil companies dominate the top spots. For an American company to succeed in this competitive landscape and go head to head with huge government-backed national oil companies, it needs financial strength and scale to execute massive complex energy projects requiring enormous long-term investments.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">To simply maintain our current operations and make needed capital investments, Exxon Mobil spends nearly $1 billion each day.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Because foreign companies and governments control the overwhelming majority of the world&#8217;s oil, most of the price you pay at the pump is the cost paid by the American oil company to acquire crude oil from someone else:</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Last year, the average price in the United States of a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline was around $2.80. On average in 2007, approximately 58 percent of the price reflected the amount paid for crude oil. Consumers pay for that crude oil, and so do we. Of the 2 million barrels per day Exxon Mobil refined in 2007 here in the United States , 90 percent were purchased from others.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Another theme of the day&#8217;s testimony was that, if anyone is &#8220;gouging&#8221; consumers through the high price of gasoline, it is federal and state governments, not American oil companies. On the average, 15% percent of the cost of gasoline at the pump goes for taxes, while only 4% represents oil company profits. These figures were repeated several times, but, strangely, not a single Democratic Senator proposed relieving consumers&#8217; anxieties about gas prices by <br /> reducing taxes.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">The last theme that was sounded repeatedly was Congress&#8217;s responsibility for the fact that American companies have access to so little petroleum. Shell&#8217;s John Hofmeister explained, eloquently:</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">While all oil-importing nations buy oil at global prices, some, notably India and China , subsidize the cost of oil products to their nation&#8217;s consumers, feeding the demand for more oil despite record prices. They do this to speed economic growth and to ensure a competitive advantage relative to other nations.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Meanwhile, in the United States , access to our own oil and gas resources has been limited for the last 30 years, prohibiting companies such as Shell from exploring and developing resources for the benefit of the American people.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Senator Sessions, I agree, it is not a free market. According to the Department of the Interior, 62 percent of all on-shore federal lands are off limits to oil and gas developments, with restrictions applying to 92 percent of all federal lands. We have an outer continental shelf moratorium on the Atlantic Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on the Pacific Ocean, an outer continental shelf moratorium on the eastern Gulf of Mexico, congressional bans on on-shore oil and gas activities in specific areas of the Rockies and Alaska, and even a congressional ban on doing an analysis of the resource potential for oil and gas in the Atlantic, Pacific and eastern Gulf of Mexico.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">The Argonne National Laboratory did a report in 2004 that identified 40 specific federal policy areas that halt, limit, delay or restrict natural gas projects. I urge you to review it. It is a long list. If I may, I offer it today if you would like to include it in the record.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">When many of these policies were implemented, oil was selling in the single digits, not the triple digits we see now. The cumulative effect of these policies has been to discourage U.S. investment and send U.S. companies outside the United States to produce new supplies.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">As a result, U.S. production has declined so much that nearly 60 percent of daily consumption comes from foreign sources.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">The problem of access can be solved in this country by the same government that has prohibited it. Congress could have chosen to lift some or all of the current restrictions on exportation and production of oil and gas. Congress could provide national policy to reverse the persistent decline of domestically secure natural resource development. Later in the hearing, Senator Orrin Hatch walked Hofmeister through the Democrats&#8217; latest efforts to block energy independence:</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: I want to get into that. In other words, we&#8217;re talking about Utah, Colorado and Wyoming . It&#8217;s fair to say that they&#8217;re not considered part of America &#8216;s $22 billion of proven reserves.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: Not at all.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: No, but experts agree that there&#8217;s between 800 billion to almost 2 trillion barrels of oil that could be recoverable there, and that&#8217;s good oil, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: That&#8217;s correct.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: It could be recovered at somewhere between $30 and $40 a barrel?</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: I think those costs are probably a bit dated now, based upon what we&#8217;ve seen in the inflation&#8230;</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: Well, somewhere in that area.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: I don&#8217;t know what the exact cost would be, but, you know, if there is more supply, I think inflation in the oil industry would be cracked. And we are facing severe inflation because of the limited amount of supply against the demand.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: I guess what I&#8217;m saying, though, is that if we started to develop the oil shale in those three states we could do it within this framework of over $100 a barrel and make a profit.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: I believe we could.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: And we could help our country alleviate its oil pressures.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: Yes.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HATCH: But they&#8217;re stopping us from doing that right here, as we sit here. We just had a hearing last week where Democrats had stopped the ability to do that, in at least Colorado.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">HOFMEISTER: Well, as I said in my opening statement, I think the public policy constraints on the supply side in this country are a disservice to the American consumer.The committee&#8217;s Democrats attempted no response. They know that they are largely responsible for the current high price of gasoline, and they want the price to rise even further. Consequently, they have no intention of permitting the development of domestic oil and gas reserves that would both increase this country&#8217;s energy independence and give consumers a break from constantly increasing energy costs.</p>
<p class="style25" align="justify">Every once in a while, Congressional hearings turn out to be informative.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt; color: black;">Dusty’s Dissenting Opinion</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 16.0pt; color: black;">…</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Foster- </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">For this “situation” of high gas prices, I can only say two things for sure: (1) Any one who thinks it’s our gasoline “tax” that’s causing the problem is…part of the problem and (2) We need to look at $6-a-gallon gas as a blessing rather than a curse. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">$4 is apparently not nearly high enough to get America’s head out of the sand (of Arabia and oblivion).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">$4 is getting Detroit’s notice (too little too late) as evidenced- thank god for small favors- by the obscene Humvees’ becoming history. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Foster, have you noticed the weather recently?  The 1000 percent increase in lightning and tornadoes are the tip of the globally-warming ice berg (melting poles). If we care about anything, why isn’t it the saving of the globe, which is a gone planet (as far as ecosystems go) in under 12 years unless Kyoto Protocols are literally adhered to by that time.  More recent models make that tipping time closer to 8 years. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">When gas hits $6 to $10,  we’ll then have the situation we did when we started the “Manhattan” project. When our trucks stop, America will stop. We’re nearing that point now as evidenced by the price of tomatoes. Necessity is a mother. And dollar-driven necessity is the only thing that’s gotten this indolent, fast-food fed, fat-corporate-cat-dominated society of ours to remove its head from its lazy rear since Hiroshima. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">This noise about Exxon Mobile execs being smarter than politicians on issues of energy and oil…What could be idler chatter?  Everyone knows they’ve pocketed greater profits in the precise period it took for oil to rise from $1.50 to $4 than ever before. If that’s not traitorous war-profiteering there’s never been any.  But, again, it’s all micro-trivia compared to the macro (global/survival)  issues:  US (and all industrial nations’) dependence on fossil fuel was doomsday dumb from the start. Today’s chapter is simply the final one in the  story of man’s wedding to oil.  It was an OK idea when there were fewer than a billion of us on the globe, but with over 6 billion, it’s a doomsday scenario. The sooner gas prices bring America to its knees the sooner America will rise. Giving those ignorant Arab sheiks the bulk of our nation’s wealth for the past half century has created the Armageddon scenario only a minor part of which is our twin towers’ toppling.  Now, from Dubai, they are running the international banks and multi-national corporations running the world. Hell, last year we sold them (unwittingly) our harbors. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">All the trivial pursuits covered by the neo-con chant you forwarded in Republican ditto-headed reflex fashion will be mooted when (if) America gets focused on remedies instead of problems. Oil prices are a problem we need to make an end-run around. Bite the bullet and  pay the money until we eliminate the need. Don’t look for new places in pristine  and off-shore places to purloin the same globally-warming and culturally-addicting substance.   Put the Arab OPEC bastards out of world-dominating business.  Wind and solar power, with today’s technologies,  end the tyranny of oil and oil peddlers. Without oil as currency, there would be no problem (much less a U.S.- run wars) in the Middle East. We can steer India and China around the same problem we’re in only by example. We can’t demand- we can only lead.  The technology is here already (see my DI article here linked: “The Answer is Blowin’ in the Wind” &#8211; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Let’s quit staring at the hole our heads seem perennially stuck in and start working on the doughnut. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Best,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">Dusty</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt; color: navy;">6-9-08</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Clinchers by Leonard Carrier</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Dusty,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">It really ticks me off when oil-company execs lay our gasoline-price increases at the door of government.  What they want to do is drill in the ANWR and in other off-shore locations&#8211;something that will bring them even more enormous profits, to the detriment of our environment. These companies are already being subsidized, while at the same time they are profiteering.  The solution to that is to eliminate all subsidies for oil companies and give them to alternative-energy companies&#8211;wind, solar, ocean, as well as to promote fuels that can be made from grasses and turkey guts. Also, raising the tax on gasoline and using the proceeds to repair our roads and bridges, as well as improving our public transportation system, is something that has worked in Europe, but has yet to be tried here.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Another annoying thing about Big Oil is that they refer to the &#8220;law of supply and demand&#8221; to justify the high prices for their products. This is arrant nonsense.  There is no such &#8220;law.&#8221;  Laws are physical necessities.  There is no necessity to engage in greed.  If these companies were interested in the well-being of our citizens, they would voluntarily cut their prices and therefore cut their profits.  &#8220;But the shareholders will complain,&#8221; might go their whinge.  I say, let them complain.  Tell the shareholders that part of their dividends are going toward the good of their fellow citizens, and toward our economy.  After all, if people can&#8217;t afford to drive their cars, the whole economy suffers, oil-company shareholders along with the rest.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">I&#8217;ve said this before.  When you find yourself in a hole, the best thing to do is stop digging.  We were warned by Jimmy Carter back in 1973 that we should practice conservation and resort to alternative energy sources.  Big Oil and Big Coal didn&#8217;t listen, and they just kept drilling and digging.  And we listened to the Republican siren song that there was plenty of cheap oil to be had. Now that climate change has been shown, beyond a reasonable doubt, to be exacerbated by the burning of fossil fuels, we need to get off our addiction to oil and coal, and do it quickly.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Are these Big Oil execs so smart, as the article in question would have us believe?  No, they&#8217;re not so smart, because they want to continue doing what they&#8217;ve been doing for years:  keeping us addicted to fossil fuels as they turn a blind eye on the pollution of our atmosphere. This is not being smart.  It is sacrificing everything of value on the alter of &#8220;the bottom line.&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">It is my hope that come this November there will be a Progressive Congress and President.  That means unseating Republican oil and coal lackeys such as James Inhofe and Mitch McConnell, and not letting John McCain, who promises to resurrect all of Bush&#8217;s failed policies, anywhere near the White House.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Best,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="justify">Len</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=147</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creeping Corporate Capitalism</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=154</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=154#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creeping Corporate Capitalism …   The Pernicious Plutocracy…   The  “Rand Syndrome”   (corollary to “The China Syndrome”)   Introduction by:  Dusty Schoch, DI Foreign-Policy Editor &#8212; with featured article from Charlotte Observer writers, Pam Kelley and Christina Rexrode&#8211; and &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=154">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=154" data-text="Creeping Corporate Capitalism" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D154&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<div class="style131">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><em><span style="font-size: 24.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Creeping Corporate Capitalism</span></span></em><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> …</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt;">The Pernicious Plutocracy…</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 16.0pt; color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 22.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">The  “Rand Syndrome”</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="color: windowtext;">(corollary to <strong>“The China Syndrome”</strong>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Introduction by:</strong> <span style="color: windowtext;"> <strong>Dusty Schoch</strong>, DI Foreign-Policy Editor &#8212; with featured article from Charlotte Observer writers, <strong>Pam Kelley</strong> and <strong>Christina Rexrode</strong>&#8211; and post-scripted comments by DI contributors, <strong>Foster Musgrove</strong> and <strong>Leonard Carrier</strong>. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">With the sub-caption, <strong>“The China Syndrome</strong>” we allude to and invite you to review previous essays by Schoch (by using the “articles” link) on the topic of corporate America’s exporting jobs and industry to India and China. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: windowtext;">My previous postulate was this</span></span></strong><span style="color: windowtext;">:  The China Syndrome (exporting America’s jobs and industry to China and other countries with “slave labor”) is exporting (destroying) America.  Corporate greed and governmental laissez-faire policies coincide to fuel the China Syndrome, with Enron and Halliburton scandals being only the top of the catastrophic ice berg. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> With the revelations that corporate-controlled Pentagon officials deceived us with false grounds for war (WMD’s etc) and further revelations that these same petro-munitions consortiums are guiding us to pursue our illegal conquest and occupation of Iraq, we saw Orwell’s nightmarish 1984 “fictional” forecast loom into actuality.  “Big brother” and the “big lies” were in fact being told the American public by a neo-con manipulated press (and, let’s concede it – a dreadfully dumbed-down American press and …America). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">My present postulate is this</span></span></span></strong><span style="color: windowtext;">: Now the neo-cons are moving in for the final kill…that’s where (as Hitler burned the books in 1933) the neo-con corporate fat cat bullies are starting to change history.  Not literally by burning books this time, but rather by a much more subtle, sinister and insidious manner…by <strong>controlling (that means revising) </strong>what is taught in our universities. By starting the propaganda in full force with our sons and daughters as they enter the cusp of the job market…as they begin to take over the leadership of our society. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">If Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” became required reading at UNC Chapel Hill, would you be upset?  OK.  I’m telling you now, our University has now agreed to make required reading out of a book which I submit to you preaches a doctrine of capitalist fascism. </span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: windowtext;"> </span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">The scoop is the subject of a well-written (by  Pam Kelley and Christina Rexrode) article appearing in the Charlotte Observer (March 23, 2008) available in full-print at this link: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1010249.html" target="_blank">http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1010249.html</a></span><span style="color: windowtext;"> and will be printed below. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Long story short</span></span></strong><span style="color: windowtext;"> – Fat cat neocon banker, John Allison, C.E.O. of BB &amp; T  has given the University of North Carolina a million dollars on the condition our students of the benefited universities read a book by Ayn Rand you may or may not have heard of entitled “Atlas Shrugged”.  <strong>Our (publicly-funded) University has agreed to the deal.</strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Ayn Rand is, for those out of this particular end of the neo-con loop, is a recently disinterred poster-child capitalistic “intellectual” who wrote some very popular fiction a half-century ago entitled “The Fountainhead” (also a movie) and “Atlas Shrugged”.  Both novels preached  the same essential socio-economic sermon, coined “enlightened selfishness”.  If Karl Marx and Lenin authored the “socialist” or “populist” end of the socio-economic spectrum of  Twentieth Century ideology , Ayn Rand founded its “individualist” polar opposite. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">The fat corporate cats of today are able and willing today to export America’s industry and jobs to foreign slave-labor (Indian and Chinese laborers earn the American equivalent of $30-$40 a month)  centers in order to skim the profits while our country is tossed towards its second depression because of its blind adherence to Randian philosophy – that our government should do nothing…absolutely nothing to stand in the way of either its citizens’ creativity or their (corporate) productivity. This philosophy of unrestrained corporate dominance has given us terminal  air and water pollution, global warming, war in Iraq and economic collapse.  And now, the fat cats want that philosophy added to the required reading of any student who attends business school in our university system. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Sound like  Hollywood mythology to you?  Don’t really think that Orwell’s 1984 scenario can really come true? Think again. Not only is it possible&#8211;our university staff and boards of trustees are going along with it. Wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that every member of our University Board of Trustees is a corporate fat cat him/her self, and probably a dedicated disciple of Ayn Rand since his own college days (when reading her sophomoric crap was optional). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Why “sophomoric crap”?  I’ll give you an example to illustrate.  I read “The Fountainhead” when I was 20. My very intellectual mother was a real devotee of Rand.  Rand is, if nothing else, a great story teller. But so’s Spephen King. You want Kujo’s creator ethically grooming your children? Back  in Rand’s day, corporations were a lot better behaved, I’ll say in my mother’s (and Rand’s)  defense. Back then, General Electric really did (occasionally) “bring better things to life”. Now the most important thing they bring to life is instant death (as the world’s largest supplier of nuclear warhead triggers); and by the way…GE has now exported (entirely) all its appliance service department to New Delhi.  If your stove or refrigerator goes on the blink – sorry; there aren’t any GE repairmen in the U.S. They’ve been “down-sized” (fired) and their jobs exported to India and China. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">This has happened because America is run by a government whose statesmen are on corporate payrolls (i.e., they don’t get elected without corporate campaign contributions, which is the same thing. The corporations get them elected; un-restricted corporate lobbyists then come straight to their (public) offices to collect the quid pro quo. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Now- back to the “example” (literary) in “<strong><em>The Fountainhead</em></strong>” that illustrates my designation of Randian Philosophy as morally bankrupt “sophomoric crap”.  The “<strong><em>Fountainhead’</em></strong>s” hero is an architect named Howard Roark.  He’s got the hots for the female protagonist, “Dominique Francon”.  She doesn’t immediately have the hots for him in return, so he does his laizzez-faire thing and rapes her.  She turns out liking it, but it was clearly rape being endorsed by this intellectually-pretentious excuse for the “great American novel” as the fat cat neo-cons call it.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">But that’s not where the corporate megalomania ends.   At the end of the book, Roark has designed and his client (big American city) has constructed a high-rise apartment complex for thousands of its middle class and  poor. Millions of public and private funds have been invested. But midway in construction, because of cost and other factors, some of Roark’s original blue prints were compromised. The residents wouldn’t each have a balcony where they could hang out flowers and sit in the sun.  Yes, this was a bad thing for the people and their visionary architect, but does Roark take them to court and make them fix what they’d done wrong? Nope. He torches the whole project. Yes sir; yes mam. His answer…and Rand’s philosophy is just that ego-centric and narcissistic.  If the government steps in the way of its artists or architects, the answer is…burn the place down. To the ground.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">In her novel, Ayn Rand makes Roark’s arson not only morally acceptable, but  heroic.  In the process, a nearly-complete habitat for thousands of the poor and middle class is torched because of the ego and pissed-off pride of a single man. Perhaps he was the original neo-con. Or perhaps  Ayn Rand herself was. In her other book, “Atlas Shrugged”, the business fat cats quit their noble narcissistic pursuits and there’s “hell to pay”.  Message – Do what the corporations say, or else. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Better watch out&#8212; Now&#8211; thanks to our fat cat corporate bankers&#8211;Ayn Rand is now required reading for your University of North Carolina student.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Read the following article with the insight—and fright—I hope it engenders in you. Fascism has many faces. Unrestrained corporate-controlled plutarchy is one of them. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Now to the beautifully-composed article by Kelley and Rexrode… </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Gifts with strings a knotty issue -</span></h2>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Ayn Rand reading requirement compromises independence, UNCC faculty say</span></h3>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">           By: Pam Kelley and Christina Rexrode</span><span style="color: windowtext;">, The Charlotte Observer*</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">As a college student in Chapel Hill, John Allison stumbled across a collection of essays by Ayn Rand and was hooked by her philosophy of self-interest and limited government. As he rose over the decades to chief executive of BB&amp;T, one of the country&#8217;s leading regional banks, Rand remained his muse. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">He&#8217;s trying to replicate that encounter through the charitable arm of his Winston-Salem-based company, which since 1999 has awarded more than $28 million to 27 colleges to support the study of capitalism from a moral perspective. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">But on at least 17 of those campuses, including UNC-Charlotte, N.C. State and Johnson C. Smith University, the gifts come with an unusual stipulation: Rand&#8217;s novel &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; is included in a course as required reading. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">The schools&#8217; agreements have drawn criticism from some faculty, who say it compromises academic integrity. In higher education, the power to decide course content is supposed to rest with professors, not donors. Debate about the gifts, which arose at UNCC this month, illustrates tensions that exist over corporate influence on college campuses. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">UNCC received its $1 million gift pledge in 2005, but details about the &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; requirement came to light as the school dedicated an Ayn Rand reading room March 12. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8220;It&#8217;s going to make us look like a rinky-dink university,&#8221; UNCC religious studies professor Richard Cohen said Thursday after UNCC Chancellor Phil Dubois told the faculty council about the gift. &#8220;It&#8217;s like teaching the Bible as a requirement.&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Dubois, who learned of the book requirement this month, says it was ill-advised. He may ask Allison to reconsider it, he told faculty. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Allison has been surprised that the gifts can generate controversy. He says he simply wants students exposed to the late author&#8217;s ideas, which he thinks the academic community has largely ignored. He welcomes opposing ideas. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">He also points out that the schools approached the foundation, not the other way around. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8220;We obviously can&#8217;t make anybody teach something,&#8221; he says. &#8220;We wouldn&#8217;t want to, we wouldn&#8217;t try to. These are professors that want to teach this.&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; tells of an America where the most gifted industrialists and creators go on strike. The book, more than 1,100 pages long, showcases Rand&#8217;s philosophy of Objectivism, which says individuals have the right to live entirely for their own self-interest. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">An atheist, Rand criticized government regulation of business. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Her followers &#8220;regard her as the greatest thinker to have graced this earth since Aristotle and the greatest writer of all time,&#8221; Reason Magazine wrote in 2005. &#8220;Mainstream intellectuals tend to dismiss her as a writer of glorified pulp fiction and a pseudo-philosophical quack with an appeal for impressionable teens.&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Allison discovered Rand as a business major at UNC-Chapel Hill in the late &#8217;60s. &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; remains his favorite book. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8220;Most of the defenders of free markets mostly do it from an economic perspective,&#8221; Allison says. &#8220;They argue that free markets produce a higher standard of living, which is certainly very good. But Rand makes a connection to human nature and why individual rights and free markets are the only system consistent with human nature.&#8221; </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">BB&amp;T officials say they never made a specific decision to spread the gospel of ethical capitalism and Ayn Rand. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">But in 1999, Duke University received money from BB&amp;T to support the teaching of values and ethics in business. The gift didn&#8217;t require that Duke teach Ayn Rand. Her work was already being taught there. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">As word spread of that gift and others, more colleges approached the foundation with proposals. Allison shared his interest in Rand with them. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">At least one school, UNC-Wilmington, offered to make &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; a requirement, figuring &#8220;our proposal might be more favorably received&#8221; if it were part of the package, officials said in an e-mail to the Observer. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Wilmington got a commitment of more than $1 million. But unlike at most campuses, the faculty voted to approve the proposal first. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Companies have long endowed college professorships and programs that fit their areas of interest. Sometimes, schools reject gifts if they can&#8217;t live with a donor&#8217;s conditions. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">But as states reduce higher education budgets, business is playing a bigger role, experts say. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8220;They&#8217;re so desperate for funding sources that they&#8217;re willing to take more money with strings attached,&#8221; says Jennifer Washburn, author of &#8220;University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education.&#8221; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">*All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">From <strong>Foster Musgrove*</strong></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Dusty,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">I read your essay with great interest and cannot believe that as a condition of a gift a university board would consent to making Rand’s book (or any book) required reading.  Having so said, I put this question to you &#8211; Is the banker the culprit here?  Did he not merely voice his preference for Rand’s works as I might for Penn Warren and certain of his works.  Was it not the Board that advanced the proposal to include the book as required reading?  All Allison (or the Foundation) ever wanted to do was to “support the teaching of values and ethics in business”.   As a banker, Allison is certainly <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Authority</span> on the subject of values and ethics or the lack thereof in business.  I would be interested (simply curiosity) to know if there were any educators on the board and whether the vote was unanimous.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Another question for you &#8211; Assume that the $1 million was the difference between keeping the university open or it closing for good.  Would refusing the money be in any way akin to Roark’s torching of the high rise?  Would the university be “cutting of its nose to spite its face”?   </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Now, as you have taught me, I am going to step outside the box.  If as you opine Rand’s works are “sophomoric crap” that a bunch of fat cat neo cons have foisted upon the academic community, does this not present the professors with the perfect storm for teaching values and ethics in business (and vice versa).  Think of it – The professor tells his students – you must read this book and here are the facts as to how it became required reading.  On the other hand, I suppose one could opine that having other than the professor <span style="text-decoration: underline;">dictate</span> course materials is the first step down the slippery slope (whether or not he is able to turn the sow’s ear into a silk purse, which, upon reflection, is the ultimate act of capitalism). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Fire away.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Foster   </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">*Foster is a previous DI contributor residing in Mableton, Georgia.  With a career background and world of experience in the realms of law and business, Foster is also an accomplished (if reluctant) writer of poems and essays.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Leonard Carrier</strong> (DI In-House Historian and Philosopher)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">Anchors the responses to Dusty’s rant on Rand becoming</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">“required” reading…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">    </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Dusty- </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">I think the UNC trustees have made a terrible decision.  Throughout my teaching career I have encountered a handful of Ayn </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Rand devotees.  These were invariably intelligent students with a quirk.  That quirk was an inability to think outside the box that Ayn Rand and her so-called philosophy of  &#8221;objectivism&#8221; provided them.  I took the time to read through the objectivist principles and found them to be a mish-mash of half-baked ideas culled helter-skelter from various philosophers, without much insight into what the philosopher&#8217;s thought processes were.  For every philosophical question, objectivism had a pat answer.  There was no emphasis on thinking for yourself, just a rote exercise in finding which pigeon hole to place the question, and then crank out the answer.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">The bare bones of the philosophical underpinning of Rand&#8217;s novels is this.  Human nature is selfish, but this is a good thing. Only when the individual truly frees himself from the bonds of society do great things get accomplished.  The entrepreneur is glorified, and the common man is vilified.  Those who champion community are depicted as being weak.  The strong person is able to break free from the rules that society in its weakness fashions for itself and thus further the progress of the human race.  When transported to the marketplace this view naturally favors unfettered, free-market capitalism.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">This Randian philosophy is flawed from the start.  Human nature is selfish to the degree that each of us needs some measure of sustenance and security.  There is no natural drive to acquire more than necessary, and those who do so are simply greedy. For the Randian, however, &#8220;Greed is good.&#8221;  Yet we need only point to the myriad of scandals that this outlook has caused lately to see that it is not only nonsensical, but criminal.  What Randians have done is to take a simple proposition such as &#8220;Everything one rationally does is self-motivated,&#8221; and interpret that to mean, &#8220;Everything one does is for oneself.&#8221;  The former proposition means only that our voluntary acts proceed from our own desires and beliefs and not from someone else&#8217;s.  Some of these desires and beliefs involve doing things for others, and so the second proposition is clearly false.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Ayn Rand&#8217;s philosophical outlook can be found in the so-called &#8220;neoconservatives&#8221; who still dominate President Bush&#8217;s official family.  These are intelligent men and women who view themselves as &#8220;elites&#8221; who can break away from the herd mentality and lead the country to the pre-eminent position it deserves.  Because they believe human nature is selfish, they think other countries are out to dominate us; and so we should have no qualms in waging preventive warfare whenever we can do so without too much cost.  These neocons believe that through pre-emptive action they can create a &#8220;new reality&#8221;&#8211;and a new morality&#8211;in which an individual state can break free of such things as the Geneva Conventions and the disapprobation of other nations in order to &#8220;come out on top.&#8221;  As in the Randian philosophy, winning is its own reward.  The fact that a premier university such as UNC would submit to having what is essentially an immoral outlook become required study&#8211;and doing it just for the money&#8211;shows how insidious the corporate influence has become in academe.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">I hope that it&#8217;s not too late for the UNC trustees to change their minds.  If not, perhaps there is a way to mitigate the damage.  One solution would be to have Orwell&#8217;s <em>1984 </em>also made required reading in the same course in which <em>Atlas Shrugged </em>is required.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Incidentally, Dusty, I  would recommend only one change in your foreword to <em>The Observer</em> article. You mention in passing that Rand&#8217;s work was &#8220;sophomoric Aristotelian elitist crap.&#8221;  All those things apply, except for &#8220;Aristotelian.&#8221;  Aristotle&#8217;s view was that the best government was that of a polity, in which people ruled and were ruled in turn.  His doctrine of &#8220;the golden mean&#8221; was meant to guide people to follow the path of moderation so as to live in harmony with others.  This is a far cry from the &#8220;winner take all&#8221; pronouncements of Ayn Rand.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">&#8211; Len</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; color: windowtext;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Thanks again, Len and Foster,  for the great elucidations—which put me back into the perspective I’d lost. It would have been totally foolish to eschew that corporate money on “principle”. Throwing out bullion with bath water.   In view of what you’ve said, I’m now thinking both Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and Hitler’s Mein Kampf should be made required reading at all secondary school venues. With photos of Auschwitz and American homeless juxtaposed on the shelves and lectern film projectors.  Lest we forget. Lest we, especially neglect to heed Neitzhe’s admonition – “Let’s keep our allies close, and our enemies closer.”  Lest we forget. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: windowtext;">Dusty</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: windowtext;"> </span></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=154</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Depression and Collapse&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=242</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=242#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is a  Depression and Collapse of America in our Offing? You can bet Barbie&#8217;s Butt it is.   The “China Syndrome” Revisited on 9/11/07   By Dusty Schoch, DW Foreign Policy Editor.   God knows, I hope I’m wrong.   &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=242">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=242" data-text="Is a Depression and Collapse&#8230;" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D242&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><div id="templateText">
<div class="style2" align="justify">
<div align="justify">
<p style= "font-size: 14.0pt;" "text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>Is a  Depression and Collapse of<br />
America in our Offing? </strong></p>
<p style= "font-size: 14.0pt;""text-align: center;" align="center"><strong>You can bet Barbie&#8217;s Butt it is.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal style30 style3" style="text-align: center;" align="center">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The “China Syndrome” Revisited on 9/11/07</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;" align="center"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">By Dusty Schoch, DW Foreign Policy Editor. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">God knows, I hope I’m wrong. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">My roommate at Lawrenceville (my New Jersey Prep School)  is working now for the U.S. Treasury. Before that he was senior partner in the world’s largest law firm, practicing in the area of international currency and tax.  He confirms (mostly by failing to deny it) what I already concluded (and wrote in a series of articles under the cap “The China Syndrome”). America’s corporate fat cats have sold America, pocketed the cash and deposited it “off shore”.  This world is run by really fat cats:  Less than one percent of Americans own over 99 percent of its assets. These fat f-ers  are secretly and sometimes not so secretly (e.g. Cheney’s and Halliburton’s open Daddy-war-bucking)   pulling all the strings.  But the strings have now been pulled so long and so hard the puppets at the end of the string (tax paying American workers) are soon going to be extinct. Their jobs have been exported to China. America as an industrial nation is melting down right before our eyes, and  like the un-rodded core of a nuclear reactor, is headed to China. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">When the “margin men” took over corporate America in the early 70’s they progressively devised ways to widen profit margins and because of their success, these margin men won positions at the top. They valued profit…above all things—including labor, product quality, the environment and their country. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">To understand what happened, you don’t have anything more complex to do than follow Barbie’s butt.  In the 60’s when she was born, “Japan” was tattooed on her impossibly high-perched and bulbous butt. The margin men were then closing down nearly all toy manufacturing because it was dollar efficient to export labor to the Far East&#8211; to those trying to catch up to the industrialists who had won the war—and had won it through amazingly innovative and energetic EFFORT AND WORK. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Those who didn’t export labor to Japan couldn’t compete…at least it was difficult. I personally refused. I built and ran a manufacturing plant on Cross St. in HP for a decade when ours was the only company in the U.S. making Snoopy toys locally. (My design, BTW, out-sold, dollar-wise any competing motorized Snoopy toy on the market for that entire decade, and all my labor was American—except for the blinking lights that were made only  in Taiwan). Back to Barbie- in the 80’s “Indonesia” or “Indo-China” was on her butt; in the 90’s “Taiwan”,  and now it’s ubiquitous “China”. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">These pre-Enron fat cats were at the same time (60’s) already exporting all the electronic fabrication of TV’s and other electronics we pioneered to the far east; the since varying venues of cheap labor are really irrelevant. The relevant thing is that the fat cats have gradually evolved us from an industrial nation to a nation of indolent greedy consumers, spoiled fast-food and TV addicts. The work ethic is dead in this country. The profit ethic and consumption addiction are pandemic. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Every other ad on tv is an infomercial showing our Donald Trump wannabees how they can make millions without getting up from their home-based PC’s. Some of the schemes (e.g., flipping “no down payment” houses) work for a while until over-doing it  inflates the economic bubble and it pops. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The original “margin men” are now the retiring generation and their successors are even more narcissistic and nihilistic than their predecessors. The original margin men competed with each other in predatory fashion but maintained some semblance of ethicality…e.g. some marginal caring for the quality of the product, and some mild concern for the health (viability) of the planet. These new, X-Gen margin men are completely soulless. Few exceptions. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">They’ve learned how to siphon dollars out of ever imaginable twist in the stream of marketing goods and services. They have eliminated  completely humanity in the service divisions of industry. When your refrigerator fails to work in the first 30 days, you’ll call your local retailer and a phone robot will satellite relay your call to a guy in New Delhi who gets paid 30 dollars a month to misinform you about what’s wrong with your refrigerator until you’re forced to call a repairman and forget the factory warranty.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">When your kidneys fail to  work,  a similar (but decidedly more serious) travesty occurs when you try to navigate the maze of your insurance-company’s cannibalistic healthcare charade in search of medical care. In this case, we—and our survival&#8211; are the items being  marginalized.  Ditto for the government agencies we created to protect ourselves from the ravages of laissez-faire industrial providers of food and consumer goods. They now own and control our FDA and FEMA watch towers, as a result of which we are eating foods our government has labeled GRAS (“generally regarded as safe”) which are clearly toxic (e.g. MSG, Aspartame and transfats) and relying on government-inspected dykes and bridges that are crumbling beneath us.  I shudder when I watch the reactions of people when some processed food company boasts of having “reduced” the amount of transfat they’re frying our chips in (in order to afford them bomb-shelter shelf life).  Few even get the irony: It’s the same thing as if Nabisco openly  announced that they are putting less arsenic in Oreo’s. But the crowning iniquity is the FDA’s allowing those same companies to sell processed foods with fats and flavorings known to sicken and  kill human beings. There was a time (e.g. under Truman who coined the phrase) where the buck actually stopped.  Now the buck stops literally for no man; it juggernaut rolls over us all…today mainly on the way to China.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">As recession becomes undeniable and depression is seen to be inevitable, government-controlled media are parroting neo-con corporate propaganda about our unemployment being the lowest in decades…whereas in point of facts a 7-th grade economics student can read and understand,  the subterfuge leaves out the “minor detail” that 30 percent of our national work force are former $17/hr (or better)  workers now waiting on tables or flipping burgers at minimum wage (which is poverty). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">But these  Titanic fat cats will not go down with our sinking ship of state. They were the first ones in fact  to jump ship. Yeah, they still have houses in Maine and on the Coasts of Florida and California, but their wealth is off shore and their new safe harbor of business operations is in Dubai.  That’s where the fat cats of America and the rest of the industrial world meet and collaborate in ways not to … compete. That’s the place where bedfellows are never considered “strange”…where the Houses of Bush and Saud are…one&#8212;where the sheiks of America and Arabie don’t even pretend to be patriots and admit to one another that there is only one god….the almighty dollar.  This is the place where the fat cats, for apt example, conceived the plan to place the security of our nation’s harbors in the safe keeping of….Arabs. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">This fat-cat “dollar club” is in fact the thing to “blame” for our spiraling down as a nation and culture. This “dollar club” has diligently and successfully managed to preserve and revitalize the institution of slavery which made our country an industrial powerhouse in the first place. But back then (in colonial America) there was an excuse. We were all pioneers and refugees from political and religious oppression. We were less enlightened as a culture and our African slaves and indentured servants were born of an institution which was “kosher” in our then agreed code of ethics (The Bible&#8212;Old and New Testaments). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">We no longer have any excuse for transplanting our institution of slavery from our own now defunct sweat shops in the north and south to the north and south of China, Indonesia or any other country stamped on Barbie’s bodacious butt.  The new so-called “globalization” is a success only in one regard…It successfully allowed the fat cat bullies of the world to remain successful and powerful by the employment of foreign and imported (e.g. Mexican) slave labor. Our former slaves had achieved, through labor unions and responsible governmental wage regulation, a modicum of freedom from the oppression of the rich and powerful.  But, with the rise of NAFTA, the new China Syndrome, and our own ignorant reinforcement of those institutions through reckless consumer and cheap-labor addiction, we of the laboring class have become complicit with the fat cats in a morally and economically dysfunctional co-dependency that has gained such momentum at this time that it appears our only salvation will come in the form of a complete meltdown of the  present economic structure . </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Yes, I’m talking (and predicting) major depression. A cleaning of the slate, where out of necessity things are forced to change. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Things certainly won’t change by a changing of the legislative guard in D.C. in ’08.  Fat cats at the top will call the shots with political  puppets on both side of the aisles so long as corporate millions are allowed (and required)  to achieve elective office. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The principal shame in the matter is that when the structure finally collapses, it will again be the poor pioneers and laborers who pick up the pieces and start over again…hopefully with a more egalitarian formulation for the </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">accumulation and sharing of the wealth the nation collectively creates. The fat cats will be able to watch the process of America’s economic and cultural demise from their new digs in Dubai. The wealth of today’s mega-wealthy is immune from collapse. Big money is “multinational” money. The House of Bush will never fall because it is wed to the House of Saud. Our X-Gen margin men who have exported their manufacturing divisions to China now have stock in China trade; their assets are “multinational”.  Their power is “global”. Their security is global. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">It’s you and I—we working class chumps who bought into the American Dream as it was covertly being transmogrified by the margin men into a global oligarchic nightmare—who will remain here on native turf, and who will (I hope and pray) E-Pluribus Unum band together bravely one more time…and hopefully in time…to Phoenix fly this rattletrap remnant of the American Eagle back into shape to soar once again into our ominously-warming sunset.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=242</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The China Syndrome Part II</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=445</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=445#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CHINA SYNDROME Part II PREFATORY NOTE:  On December 18, Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, posted on this DW site an essay entitled “The China Syndrome” in which he expressed his great concern with the domestic and foreign consequences of American Corporations &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=445">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=445" data-text="The China Syndrome Part II" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D445&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><h1 align="center"><em>The </em><em>CHINA</em><em> SYNDROME</em></h1>
<h1 align="center"><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Part II</span></em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><a href="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/clip_image001.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-448" title="clip_image001" src="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/clip_image001-220x300.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="300" /></a></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PREFATORY NOTE</span></em><em>:  On December 18, Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, posted on this DW site an essay entitled “The China Syndrome” in which he expressed his great concern with the domestic and foreign consequences of American Corporations exporting jobs and industry to China. (Link:<a title="http://democratswrite.com/the_democratic_opinion/page247.htm" href="http://democratswrite.com/the_democratic_opinion/page247.htm">http://democratswrite.com/the_democratic_opinion/page247.htm</a>).</em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em>As a follow-up, and with the kind permission of this distinguished new DW contributor, Paul C. Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Reagan, and Wall Street Journal Editor, DW readers are urged to  consider further—and to QUESTION CRITICALLY &#8211;THE NEO-CON PARTY LINE ON THE PRESENT STATE OF OUR ECONOMY.</em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em>As jobs and industrial production are being “off-shored” to China and other places where the fat corporate cats can exploit the labors of economically-desperate peoples in “multinational” combines with foreign fat cats, are Americans being told the truth when their Congressmen and the Corporate-controlled media are telling us all that economic indicators are “up” and there is “healthy activity” in the stock exchanges, and that the “dollar is sound” and there is reason for optimism based on decreases in unemployment in the U.S. and all that …..B___  ____  (read the article before you fill in these blanks)…</em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em>?</em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em> </em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em> </em></h1>
<h1 align="justify"><em>Will the Unemployed Become Cannon Fodder for Bush&#8217;s Wars?</em></h1>
<h1 align="justify">Artificial Recovery; Real Job Losses</h1>
<p align="justify">By <strong>PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS*</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p align="justify">Readers want to know why I have not reported on the payroll jobs statistics for the past two months. Does this mean, they ask, that the situation has turned around and that the US economy is again creating jobs in export and import-competitive sectors?</p>
<p align="justify">Alas, no. I did not write about the past two payroll jobs data reports, because it is the same distressing story that other readers say they are bored with hearing.</p>
<p align="justify">The July report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics lists 113,000 new jobs, all of which are in services.</p>
<p align="justify">“Leisure and hospitality” accounted for 42,000 jobs, most of which are waitresses and bar tenders.</p>
<p align="justify">“Education and health services” accounted for 24,000 jobs.</p>
<p align="justify">“Professional and business services” accounted for 43,000.</p>
<p align="justify">Manufacturing lost another 15,000 jobs.</p>
<p align="justify">In the US today, government employs 7.7 million more people than does manufacturing. Little wonder we have an $800 billion annual trade deficit when the government sector is larger than the manufacturing sector.</p>
<p align="justify">American economists are yet to face up to the fact that off shoring high productivity, high value-added jobs that pay well and replacing them with waitresses and bartenders is a knife in the heart of the US economy. Charles W. McMillion of MBG Information Services reports that compensation is falling behind price rises and that the US economy has been kept afloat by consumers overspending their disposable incomes by drawing down their accumulated assets and going deeper into debt.</p>
<p align="justify">McMillion reports that according the Bureau of Economic Affairs, households outspent their disposable incomes by 1.5% in the second quarter of this year, a rate of dissaving equaled only by the depression year of 1933.</p>
<p align="justify">McMillion also reports that recent BLS data indicates that 25 states have lost manufacturing jobs year over year and that 25 states have lost jobs in the information sector.</p>
<p align="justify">Little wonder that permits for new private housing are down 20.5% year over year and that new housing starts are down 13.3% year over year. What will we do with the millions of illegal Mexicans when construction jobs dry up?</p>
<p align="justify">Wage data covering 82% of all private sector jobs show that the purchasing power of weekly wages today is less than it was when the economic recovery began in November 2001.</p>
<p align="justify">What kind of economic recovery is it when the purchasing power of wages falls instead of rises?</p>
<p align="justify">In my opinion, the recovery was artificial. It was based on extremely low interest rates orchestrated by the Federal Reserve. The low interest rates discouraged saving, but the low rates reduced the mortgage cost of real estate, inflated home prices and encouraged consumers to refinance their homes and to spend the equity.</p>
<p align="justify">The federal government has been overspending its income also, and has wasted a minimum of $300 billion on an illegal, pointless, and lost war that has turned Iraq into a terror zone.</p>
<p align="justify">It is unclear how much longer the world will trade Americans real goods for pieces of paper that the US economy cannot redeem with tradable goods and services.</p>
<p align="justify">Considering the loss of good jobs, the high debt burden, and the dependence on imports, it is unclear what will enable America to pull herself out of the next recession.</p>
<p align="justify">Perhaps growing ranks of the unemployed will become cannon fodder for Bush’s wars in the Middle East.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong>*Paul Craig Roberts</strong> was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at:<a title="mailto:paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com" href="mailto:paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com">paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com</a></p>
<p align="justify">Originally written in August, ‘06 and reprinted here with his gracious permission.</p>
<p align="justify"><strong>PS  From Leonard Carrier</strong></p>
<p align="justify">DW In-House Historian and Philosopher:</p>
<p align="justify">Even the economic policy wonks on Larry Kudlow&#8217;s Wall Street-oriented TV business show are agreed that the U.S. dollar will sink against the euro, and they <em>hope </em>that it won&#8217;t sink against Asian currencies.  Yeah, right, fat chance.</p>
<p align="justify">     We&#8217;re going down the tubes slowly, but inexorably.  It&#8217;s like the grim joke I heard as a youth:  One man faces his rival and swipes at his face with a straight razor.  The other says, &#8220;You missed.&#8221;  Then the first says, &#8220;Just try turning your head.&#8221;  That&#8217;s what I think we&#8217;re in for.  When we turn our heads we&#8217;ll be in real trouble. – Len</p>
<p align="justify"><strong>PPS From Dusty</strong></p>
<p align="justify"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="justify">Len, the way I heard the same story, it was told thusly:  The Wall Street guy, to persuade everyone to keep believing in him and his bullish faith in American dollars and blue chip stock, conceived a way to demonstrate his bullishness and climbed to the top of the Empire State Building with an exact replica of De Vinci’s mechanical wings – you remember, the 1488-model ones with the cloth and wood that you flap like bird wings to manage man-powered flight.</p>
<p align="justify">With honest zeal and perfect confidence he leaps from the guard rail at the cloudy top and begins immediately flapping away his mechanical wings. He has a cell phone taped to his helmet as he descends and is shouting optimistic things all the way down in the precipitous angle that appears from the street to be more vertical plumb than take-off parabola. He is down to the first floor plummeting with now terminal velocity as the cracks in the sidewalk are to him coming cataclysmically into focus and as he descends is overheard in spite of all apparent odds and ends,  “so far…so good!”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=445</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The China Syndrome</title>
		<link>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=402</link>
		<comments>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=402#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The   CHINA  SYNDROME By  Dusty Schoch &#160; An open letter, by DW Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, to Mr. Robert Culp III, High Point, N.C. (DW hometown) C.E.O. of Culp Inc., a furniture, upholstery and fabrics conglomerate which in the &#8230; <a href="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=402">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content socialize-in-content-right"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="https://www.declaringindependents.com/?p=402" data-text="The China Syndrome" data-count="vertical" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-right"><iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.declaringindependents.com%2F%3Fp%3D402&amp;send=false&amp;layout=box_count&amp;width=50&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div></div><p style="text-align: center;">The   CHINA  SYNDROME</p>
<p><a href="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/stinking-middle-class.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-403" title="stinking-middle-class" src="http://www.declaringindependents.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/stinking-middle-class-220x300.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>By  Dusty Schoch</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>An open letter, by DW Foreign Policy Editor, Dusty Schoch, to Mr. Robert Culp III, High Point, N.C. (DW hometown) C.E.O. of Culp Inc., a furniture, upholstery and fabrics conglomerate which in the past decade has closed most of its manufacturing doors and shipped its fabrication division (labor) “off shore” to China. The company announced the closing of the last remaining two of its plants in N.C., with the sacrifice of 185 jobs.  On December 15, 2006, Mr. Culp was quoted in his local paper, the High Point Enterprise,  as saying “By further consolidating our U.S. manufacturing operations and utilizing lower cost manufacturing alternatives, we are reducing our operating costs and improving our domestic capacity utilization…” Mr. Culp went on to claim that all this means that “We have  been “…highly  successful with our China platform…and continue to be encouraged by the progress we are making in selling non-U.S.-produced products.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What has this to do with U.S. foreign policy you might ask?  Well…. Consider this:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Who’s “We”, Mr. Culp?”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The quote from C.E.O., Robert Culp, in your Dec. 15 business section was that through the closing of Culp Inc’s last two NC-based fabric plants—eliminating 185 jobs for residents of Lincolnton and Graham—“We have been highly successful with our China platform….”.   Does the “we” include those 185 Culp employees whose jobs have been quite literally Shanghai’d?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>About 3 years ago I recall an article wherein Culp stated  he was satisfied with the “balance” of off-shoring his company had achieved and hoped to maintain. Now there is no Culp Inc. in NC unless you count what remains of their former industry, where they apparently have switched  roles from American manufacturers to Chinese sales reps.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What remains of the furniture and textile industries in this town that prompted its patriarchs to name their  club “The String and Splinter”?  Isn’t it time we call it the “Lint and Dust Club?”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As Christmas nears, Mr. Culp,  will your former employees be seated around their tables celebrating their “high success” along with you?  Who’s the “we”, Mr. Culp?   Would that be you and your Chinese partners—the ones paying their employees $179/mth?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I’m not an economist and admittedly  have very little knowledge and even less appreciation for mega-million-dollar corporate margins and maneuverings.  But what little I do know includes the fact that exporting jobs and manufacturing  to China betokens industrial defeat and a quest for short-term profits, and one day there will be hell to pay when we are totally dependent on China (our most formidable  nuclear-armed enemy on earth) and they suddenly declare  the dollar is worth about a nickel. When that happens, no Federal Reserve ping-ponging with  prime will keep Peking’s hands off the switch of American inflation and/or depression.  Happy Christmas, Mr. Culp, and</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>God Bless us…every one.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Dusty Schoch</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>December 15, 2006</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.declaringindependents.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=402</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
