PEELING IT TO THE CORE AND DECLARING PEACE

Although history is one of our greatest teachers, and though mastering it affords us the opportunity to keep it from repeating itself, I think that history in the final analysis is like the onion. The more you peel off layers looking for truth, the more layers of former illusion you will discover. Finally, it seems, as you peel down the layers of history or science to discover the core of “truth” within, the cores turn out to be alive and growing, and as such, are incapable of exact measurement or analysis.

In our life time, for example, the Jews have been victims of the holocaust of WWII and a myriad of other travails and persecutions. Peel the onion of their history down to their origins (their own Genesis/Exodus/Leviticus accounts) and it appears the original tribes of Israel were among the world’s first genocidal peoples, who, under the license and directive of their “God”, entered into lands occupied by others whom they serially and systematically slaughtered on their holy trek to secure and dominate the real estate promised them by their God in a special covenant which excluded all but them.

Displaced and homeless Jews persecuted in Europe displaced—and rendered homeless–as much as 85 percent of the resident Islamic population of the region which became the State of Israel in 1948, a state formed by an ad-hoc caucus in which none of the displaced Islamic residents had a single delegate.

The citizens of the United States were liberators and saviors of Europeans in 1945, but two hundred years before were “insurgents” who murdered the agents and soldiers of the ruler to whom they had sworn fealty. During the two centuries  before that, they invaded , murdered, imprisoned or otherwise displaced scores of native American cultures, all in the names and sakes of their primarily Christian cultures and creeds.

Bin Laden is a C.I.A. ally, trainee and protégé in America’s covert alliance with Afghani insurgents in 1982 and the heart of Evil’s Axis when he remains allied with those same insurgents as they turn their war-frenzied gaze from the retreating  Russian infidels  to the incoming infidels…those increasingly-militant allies of Israel…you guessed it…oil-drilling, sheik-hand-holding, wealth and resource-seizing America. Us.

Saddam is American’s ally and oil-bargaining buddy in 1980 and our arch enemy in ‘93, and moreso (allegedly) in 2003.

The “peeled onion” point: Read history long enough and there are no consistently “good” or “evil” entities among the several nations and peoples contending with one another. The “liberator” of today is the aggressor of tomorrow. 

The United States built its seminal wealth by stealing assets of aboriginal cultures and subsequently developing those assets and resources by the use of slave labor. At the end of this growth process, and the civil war to humanize and anneal it,  America became strong enough to act as liberator of the free world, and twice within a single century. With that success came the recognition, the gratitude and indebtedness of the rest of the world, and with it the power no other nation had to this point in time ever attained. The question yet unanswered by history’s perennially-peeling onion is… Will America’s near absolute power wind up corrupting America absolutely?

Every nation — like every individual human–when viewed chronologically (through significant time in their historic “lives”) is a patchwork quilt. There are some pretty and “good” patches, and some ineptly-sewn, sloppy and even ragged patches. The moral of the American movie (“The Making of an American Quilt”, starring Wynonna Ryder) was quite beautiful: Let’s judge each other as we do our communally-sewn patchwork quilts—not on the basis of any individual patch, but on the basis of whether, taking it as a whole, on a cold and dreary winter’s night when we wrap it about our shoulders…does it keep us warm?

Saint Francis of Assisi put it poignantly when he confessed there was no way he could ever have come to be viewed as “saintly” had he not first lived as one of the world’s most reprehensible sinners.

If America in this Middle Eastern conflict, or more broadly, in its apparently increasing determination to condemn and wage war on Islamic peoples for the criminal acts of some of their radical fundamentalists,  has gone astray as a peace-loving nation, America as a nation is not necessarily lost.  American and all peoples and nations are better viewed in the contexts of the sum of their historically mosaic parts. It’s not only what we’ve done that will define us in the future, but rather what we do today and hereafter. The American Quilt, like the onion, continues to grow even as I write.

The point I was hopefully leading up to here is this: Some time, somewhere along the karmic-patchwork progression of history we’ve got to get off the wagon of cause and effect, climb down from the pulpit of “who threw the stone first” and simply draw a line in the sand and say this: “It doesn’t matter who threw the stone first. There will be no more stones thrown. From this point on, there will be no preemptive aggression. Men may defend their lives, but they will defend with the use of force only after every means of international diplomacy and peaceful resolution has been exhausted. They will be intolerant of nothing but intolerance and untruth. They will cease justifying aggression in the present with the aggression of their opponents in the past.”

We must unite in a cease fire. And finally, if the source or seeds of the problems of aggression are centered or being fostered within the walls of religious institutions and ideologies, then that is where the peace effort must be focused and exerted. If a Jihad exists within Islam which advocates the taking of innocent lives, then the Jihad must by some means be extinguished. If a plan is underway within the walls of either Judaism or Christianity (or both in conjunction) to fulfill putative Biblical prophesies of Armageddon’s end-time wars in order to either lay the way for the second coming of a prophet or procure by force land reportedly promised to Jews and/or Christians of which they are not presently and legally seized, then the plans for actively ordaining such prophesies must by some means be extinguished.

We will not solve the problems causing wars by assigning unreal causes (religious prophesy) for those wars. If a cow is trampling an innocent child, that cow needs to be restrained, albeit sacred or sacrificial. If there are Jihads or undeclared wars of Zionist ambition (or either Armageddon or  Rapture fulfillment) underway, then those responsible must be approached, counseled and dealt with.

But to whom do we turn  for such a change? Will it be our politicians who dare to “meddle” with the onion’s core (theological/theocratic) problems within Islam, Christianity and Judaism that may be the prime movers or at least co-efficient causes of the conflict in Middle East?  If in fact anti-Western Jihad and anti-Islamic Zionist sermons are being preached in the Mosques, Maddrasses, Churches and Synagogues of our world, will our politicians be willing or able to initiate any meaningful change, given the historically inveterate jealousies and  divisions between clerical and secular powers within diverse cultures? Tony Blair’s efforts in this regard in Great Britain following the terrorist bombings of the subways have thus far backfired and been condemned by Islam as failed efforts on the part of a  secular infidel to pervert the interests of Islam for the benefit of the Satanic U.S./G.B. coalition.

But it is clearly the subversion of fundamentalists of the several faiths by the demagogic secular leaders of presently warring cultures that has led us into this war with terrorism.  Bin Laden is essentially a secular power-mongering demagogue and opportunist who became a successful terrorist by perverting Islam and manipulating impressionable, depressed and devout fundamentalist Islamic followers to become tools for his secular agenda, and as such to perform as self-sacrificial “I.C.B.M”’s (intercontinental ballistic Muslims) against the West.  It is widely believed in the non-Western world that the Bush leadership has harnessed, through similar Machiavellian stealth, the fundamentalist Christians of America to falsely perceive (and thus elect and support) him as a “Christian warrior” in spite of the fact that the same oxymoronic  posture was first assumed by Adolph Hitler in 1938.

Given the efforts on the parts of secular (political) leaders of both sides of the terrorist struggle to exploit their respectively-faithful fundamentalist supporters and activists, it is naïve to look to politicians to institute or mediate any détente or  separate accord of peace among the religious leaders of their respective constituencies and/or armed holy warriors.

I say, therefore, it is the responsibility of our religious leaders, quite independently of our politicians, military personnel and secular leaders, to assume the responsibility. It is their clear and present duty to weave and take up the banner and find a way to unite with one another, collaborate with one another, cooperate with one another and declare peace with one other. Innocent people are dying in Iraq, England and around the world. Thousands perished on American soil on 9/11.  This killing violates shared tenets of Christianity, Judaism and Islam alike. The leaders of all faiths have independently agreed and declared as much, but they have not yet done so together, in pro-active concert with one another. They have all espoused peace from pulpits ensconced in secure and separate quarters within the militarily-gated communities of their secular kings, ayatollas, presidents, prime ministers and  their respective nation states.

Bin Laden’s version of Islam is false and itself a perversion and sin against Islam. The great majority of Islam’s clerical authority has openly and formally condemned terrorism carried out in the name of Islam.  Our attack on Iraq was a violation of Christian and Jewish Commandment and is clearly the antithesis of Christ’s clear teaching;  but where—anywhere—from the Vatican to the Church of England to the Southern Baptist Convention–is there any righteous Christian condemnation of Americas aggression?  Where in the Christian faith, in the entire institutional “Body of Christ” is there evidence of anything but endorsement and complicity in America’s admittedly preemptive aggression in the Middle Eastern Holy Land of Christians, Jews and Islam?

The followers of Christ, Mohammed and Islam all have a common  progenitor and patriarch.  His name was Abraham. Although they have different names for Him, they worship a common God, because they all agree there is but the One.

Mark Twain once said (ironically in retrospect),  “Everybody talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it.”  Amazingly enough we now have. No one disputes global warming presently exists.  There’s apparently nothing humans can’t accomplish with their God-given inventiveness and collective ingenuity.

By the same space-age token, there was once a time one might have safely and sanely said, “let’s not worry about history, because earthly life and history will go on…like an onion, which–even while one is peeling it–may continue to grow.” But since Einstein and our ability to harness—and unharness—the atom, it appears there is definitely a way people can today stunt and potentially terminate the growth of all life on their planet, including that precious onion of man’s historic progress hidden in his larder, carefully wrapped up in possibly the finest patchwork quilt in the universe. 

But—before that happens–I propose an international summit  for the negotiation and drafting  of a united Global Declaration of Peace by the clerical leaders of Christianity, Islam, Judaism and all the other religions of world.  We know where our Captains of War are today. But where are our Princes of Peace?  What are they waiting for? I hope and pray it’s not simply Armegeddon and/or the Rapture. If and/or when God might intend those events to occur, He certainly has not appointed any of  us to engineer  or pro-actively pursue them.

Come forth, Billy and Franklin Graham– your pulpit was not built, nor does it belong, in the White House. Come forth Benedict XVI; the Vatican is no longer Papal puppet to any throne. Come forth Rabbis and Imans;  Come clerical  descendants of Isaac and Ishmael– your Sharons and sheiks have no final sway in what you must do and say.

You—all of you—hold…and manipulate…the theological needles and threads of sermons being woven in the patchwork quilts of your pulpits…not Bush, not bin Laden,  not Sharon, and not any of the secular leaders of this world.

With those “theological needles and threads”, what practical stitching must be accomplished—as a practical minimum—by these brave  clerics of our revolutionarily new world order of peace?  Without attempting to cite the plentitude of peaceful statutes and verses within the Old and New Testaments and  Koran, the necessary ingredients are…elementary:

Declaring Peace:

Practical Patch Sewing at the Onion’s Core

(I.C.P.  Axioms, Corollaries and Addenda)

The  Intercontinental Congress of Peace  (I.C.P.)  will be assembled for the pre-declared purpose of adopting and integrating into its Interfaith Declaration of Interdependence and Peace (I.D.O.I.A.P.),  inter alia, both a pledge to maintain and abide in peace, and a definition and joint condemnation and universal clerical prohibition of “terrorism” as hereinafter defined, all according to the following axiom, corollaries and addenda: 

A X I O M : TERRORISM IS ANATHEMA and refers to: one human’s  intentionally injuring or killing another human except in self defense.

F i r s t     C o r o l l a r y :  Attacks on either military personnel or civilian populations are never justified as “self defense” unless those personnel or populations are at the same time themselves actively engaged in the process of committing terrorism. Accordingly, all pre-emptive injurious attacks on human beings constitute terrorism, and this includes attacks on non-human targets that injure humans in the process.

S e c o n d   C o r o l l a r y:  The attacker is deemed to have intended the natural consequences of his acts. If a skyscraper 120 stories high is attacked and destroyed  after the attacker has inspected and found vacant every room and closet therein save one which was inadvertently overlooked, he is a terrorist if a single human in the unfound closet is injured.

T h i r d    C o r o l l a r y :  Before the conclusion  of the Intercontinental Congress of Peace, an Interfaith Declaration of Interdependence and Peace should be signed by all Clerics in attendance, who immediately upon adjournment will return to their places of religious worship and spiritual communion and preach and disseminate by all means conceivable and available the sermons and resolutions that peace has been declared and shall thereafter be invariably the required behavior of all members of the various religions with permanent excommunications from their respective  bodies of all who thereafter violate the collective, Interfaith Declaration of Interdependence and Peace.

F o u r t h   C o r o l l a r y : An invariably integral portion of each sermon will be recitations and  avowals that the Clerics of all the religions assembled at the I.C.P. were responsible for the united adoption of the Declaration of Interdependence and Peace, and as such, that both they and their faithful following are perpetually entitled to all other faith’s according to both them and their partners in faith: peace, love, friendship, truth, respect, and inclusion in prayers.

F i f t h   C o r o l l a r y : All clerical leaders who have attended the I.C.P. and signed the I.D.O.I.A.P. have walked the walk. It is thereafter mandatory that each of them, for the rest of their lives continue to both walk the walk and talk the talk of peace.  Part of that duty may involve acts of civil disobedience in instances where secular leaders thereafter commit acts of terrorism or attempt to induce others to perform acts of terrorism.

A d d e n d u m: Consonant with its letter and spirit, it is recalled and noted that America’s first and foremost collective resolution, its July 4, 1776 Declaration of Independence, was itself an act of civil disobedience.  It is suggested that that which at the time was deemed moral and just for the sake of taxes and equal sway in British Parliament, is as well, if not clearly more compellingly founded (by the declaring consensus) upon the will and recorded commandments of infinitely higher authorities and allegiances.

You do not need the blessing, authority or permission of any politician or statesman in your midst. If declaring and waging wars and defending their peoples in wars is their primary focus and duty, declaring peace is yours. You do not need the protection of their warriors.  Buddha did not seek the permission or protection of the warring lords in his homeland. Gandhi did not seek refuge. Martin Luther King stepped to the front of the many lines he drew in the deserts of bigotry and hatred. Moses and Mohammed heeded only a single voice, which was certainly not secular.  Jesus Christ made of His life and blood a sermon of peace, and rendered none of it to Caesar.

It is your sermons—united in peace– that will save us from this war…not their swords.

Which of you will hear and heed this call to come forth and enlist as representatives of your faith and as pilgrims of peace and  attend the world’s first Intercontinental Congress for Peace? Which will sojourn to Switzerland and subscribe to the world’s first Interfaith Declaration of Interdependence and Peace?

Which  of you will come forward (and to Switzerland)  in response to this challenge and call and be first to call the rest to a summit of peace among a coalition of clerics in the world? Which of you will become signatories of the world’s first Declaration of Peace?

War is the only enemy.

Dusty Schoch

High Point, NC

August 15,2005

 “Matches  and  Haystacks”

(An Arabian Allegory)

Let’s consider two combatants contemplating war against one another and make a wager on which will   be victorious before their war begins (“victorious” meaning : “to get the outcome the combatant wants in the war”).

On one side are the  “haystacks.”   They are the common-variety haystacks, made of golden  harvested grass, pitched high in a pile , shining in the sun.  These haystacks want to endure , intact, until their destinies are  fulfilled by deployment into  the service of their makers.  On the other side are the  “matches” – all of them the  self-igniting stick variety, having the general size ,  shape and aspect  of  large needles without eyes.

  The ultimate purpose  of all the matches  is to set fire to all  the haystacks.  The easiest way to accomplish this is for the matches  to imbed themselves deep inside  the haystacks , where,  because of their  small size and the haystacks’  greater  mass ,   it is easy  for them  to remain hidden until the call for ignition.  When the call to ignite is given by the leaders of the matches, all the matches in all the haystacks will strike  themselves and go up in flames along with their individual haystack hosts.   Being thusly consumed , however, is no defeat or problem for the matches, who are all trained by masterful match  mentors to believe that when they are immolated in a haystack fire they themselves start, they will be instantly transported – intact and unscathed  into an after life where  they’ll be safe and happy forever -  that being , cushioned amidst the churlish labia and securely-clenched teeth of an aspiring cinema cowboy , sitting on a subservient bale of hay in the non-smoking section of a sushi bar in lower L.A. watching CNN and  waiting for a Hollywood talent agent to phone. 

Now for the wager:  When all the matches in the world are safely and securely  ensconced  in all the haystacks in the world, and the haystacks declare war on the matches and threaten to seek them out and set them on fire, tell me ,  where are you going to place your bets?

REVOLUTIONARY WAR ON TERRORISM :

 
“REVERSE  JIHAD”

When you’re marching to war  in the dark , in the enemy’s own territory, and you have no idea of  his whereabouts – not to mention his identity -  do you turn to the strategies of  Generals Patton and Rommel, or Ceaser’s Gallic  Wars?   Although the principles of conventional warfare helped  expedite the outcome of Desert Storm,  they were little help with the Viet Cong and they’ll be of even lesser utility in ferreting out those ghosts of Jihad hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan and in as remote hideouts in possibly twenty other countries. This time, rather than Schwartzkoff and the Manual of Arms, I think  we’re going to need something akin to Aikido,  Islamic style,   al  la  Allah.  We’re going to need  “Reverse Jihad”.

 The Problem:The Enemy

Our terrorist  enemies are stateless.  Their principal  bond  is their only identifying feature -  the mask of holy Muslim Warrior waging a self-proclaimed  revolutionary Jihad, pursuant to  an auto-generated edict , or Fatwa, calling for the death of all  Americans and  other “ infidels”.   These terrorist fanatics  are willing (and in many cases wanting) to die for their cause.  We are not contending with the typical motives of a territorially-acquisitive  invader like Saddam Hussein; we are being attacked by a  perverted belief system and the zealous followers of  a brilliant and psychotic charismatic leadership. The most effective force to overcome such a belief system is the force which created it, according to one Aikido principle of martial art.  We can kill any number of terrorists, provided we find them, but the only power that can disarm the entire disparate band of holy warriors is the power that created and  sustains them.  Like it or no, these terrorists are on a holy mission.  It  is rationally and theologically a twisted and  perverted mission, but a mission perceived by its zealous executors as by and for  Allah nonetheless .  Only Islam  can intervene to “end”  (as opposed to “win”) this newly-declared war on  Islamic Terrorism.  Fortunately there may be a way this can be accomplished.

The Solution(s)

Discovering a solution to the problem doesn’t end the problem – only implementing it does. The terrorist threat presents a  compound problem  that must be solved on three levels: the immediate, the core and the ultimate .

The ultimate problem will be dealing with the terrorists when and if we identify and  locate them.  The core problem is discovering a means of identifying and locating the enemy.  The immediate problem is discovering the means of communicating  the solutions to the core problem to our administration and military leadership.

What follows is a proposal for solving the core  problem – identifying and locating the enemy.  A secondary purpose of the present writing is to enlist the reader in the task of solving the immediate problem -  getting the core solution to the leadership whose task is to  execute the ultimate solution, and getting it to them in time … before we run amuck and enable  the Bin  Laden’s  out there to realize their  ultimate goal  of global  Armageddon.

The Terrorist’s  Prophesy and Plan

Bin Laden  wants and needs this “war between Islam and the rest of the world”,  in the aftermath of which, he plans to become Iyatolla Mondo.  If Americans follow through with their covert , obtuse and  inchoate plans to invade Afghanistan – or any Muslim state,  on the ground or in the air , innocent people  will die.  Muslim innocents. This will fulfill bin Laden’s prophesy,  confirm  his  status as a prophet of Islam and quite  possibly mark the beginning of the true mother of all wars – Islam vs. the rest of the world. The least we stand to lose in such a war are  our oil supplies and  economic viability;   the  most , along with others, our peaceful existence (pardon the arguable  redundancy) . Fortunately there may be a way to avoid all this and still accomplish the ultimate goal of defeating the terrorists in their quest for Armageddon and world domination by default.

In Pursuit of the Core : Premises

1

With the possible exception of Israel, every Middle Eastern  country directly or indirectly depends on oil, U.S. distribution of petro products and U.S.  (world) economic stablity to survive. Automobiles and computers today are  material and corporate composits of multi-national industry.  The stock markets and monetary systems of the East , West  and  Europe , while posing   as disparate and autonomous performers  on the  shimmering surface of commerce, are  symbiotic and even incestuous  beneath the currents of international competition. Presently the world is watching while its capital resources are beginning  to trickle down a deep and dark hole  an alarmingly  few Persian  pirates dug in the soil and soul of  New York’s  treasured island.  Bin Laden’s  terrorist team , if successful, could  ultimately destroy  Western , OPEC and conceivably  the entire world’s  economies . The keystone of  economic stability is confidence. The  sheiks and  clerics who control Islam have been to school  or else have a dozen or more  sons who have. The concept  that bin Laden’s  agenda, unimpeded , could  render the Twin Towers but  the first to fall in a global house of cards is not beyond their ken.

2

Bin Laden’s  counterfeit fatwa against the U.S. and others is, according to true Islamic law, criminally false and heretic. There is no room for debate on this point -  unless one is debating an Islamic terrorist.

3

Islamic leaders and clerics in conjunction with secular heads of  Arab state dominate the governments in all Islamic countries, including Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE,  Pakistan , Afghanistan  and the rest.

4

Seeking out , locating and eliminating  Bin Laden and his twenty-thousand-strong, stateless, multi-nationally-based net strewn out in all these disparate  territories is MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, at least for the U.S, with use of conventional machinations and tactics. It’s  Viet Nam times ten … maybe twenty.

5

Bin Laden’s strength and  the sine qua non of his terrorist revolution  is his ability to convince uneducated, impoverished,  desperate ,   marginal  Islamic people that the U.S. and other “infidel”  capitalistic people are the cause of their miseries, and that a holy war (Jihad) waged against them will improve their miserable plight.

6

Bin Laden’s phony fatwa and his united Jihad war are , according to Islamic law, not only criminally  wrong, but religiously  hypocritical  and heretic, such as would justify a fatwa and Jihad being declared and waged against him and his terrorist network.   Why isn’t it already?  Indeed.   The point.

7

Presently , Bush, C. Powell, the U.S. Congress , State Department and Armed Forces are all frenetically deliberating on a means of coaxing unfriendly or luke-warm (to America) Arab nations  to assist us in the war we’ve declared against bin Laden and the pseudo-Islamic terrorists. To this end,  Bush is contemplating a bootleg turn in dipolmacy (from Clinton’s plan) to unilaterally propound statehood for Palestine. He’s  obviously contemplating the concession of this  precious Arabic quid without realizing the potential of the Western  quo he could lever in exchange.  All he stands  to gain is Arab approval and good will, and maybe some passively-aggressive tokens in the  way of fly-over nods and possible air base concessions.

8

When we were  listening to the speech given by Iran’s deputy  foreign  minister to the U.N. on Oct. 2^nd,  we heard him state  that the highest Islamic leader of Iran  had recently  declared that “the war against the terrorists itself amounts to Jihad.”  Was anyone listening?   Islamic leaders from virtually all Middle Eastern kingdoms and countries have , since September 11,  met and unanimously condemned  all past and recent acts of terrorism as criminal and “non-Islamic” , and  where self-denominated as such, “heretic”.   Was anyone listening?   More recently, and since it has come to light that not only bin Laden, but  perhaps as many as 15 of  the 19 September 11 hijackers were native Saudi Arabian,   America’s most strategically and economically  important Middle Eastern ally  acknowledged  through its interior minister (Prince Nayif bin Abd al-Aziz al-Saud) that Kingdom’s  vulnerability  to (and by implication , responsibility for)  home-grown terrorism:

            “We will not forget that those who now are in their caves and burrows, they are the ones who do harm to the Kingdom” . . . “and unfortunately Muslims are being held accountable for them although Islam is innocent . . .”        Declaring that no one, not even their relatives, should show terrorists sympathy, the Prince added: “The body has diseases and some organ could be diseased. So the diseased organ must be removed.” * 

            Was anyone listening?

9

Two things should have crystalized in our thinking upon the occasions of these epiphanic utterances:  First , that Bin Laden, his Taliban and the whole terrorist cult  are essentially  problems of Arab generation and etiology, and accordingly, exist and persist as  essentially Islamic problems . We in the West are simply  the most  recent secondary victims of the Islamic body’s terrorist disease and  its sequelae .  Second ,  that we  were being handed – by  the ministers of  Iran and Saudi Arabia – both  the ideologic means, and the theological/political precedent to solve the  core problem of current  terrorism.

We should be  sympathetic with the deplorable living conditions of the war-weary and leary Afghani’s. But the Taliban is over there -  in control  of them ,  over there. We are over here.  Yes,   we may have  played our part in the Cold War which created the governmental void  which the Taliban filled upon Russia’s retreat. But , though  we are all reaping the harvests sewn in  that war,  no one is really to blame for terrorism  but the terrorists , Bin Laden and the Taliban.

“Islamic terrorism” may be oxymoronic , but it is also a reality – as much a reality  one could argue as were the savage wars of religious conversion waged centuries ago by Christians and Muslims both denominated
“crusades” .    But, again, let us insist that, although it has killed some of us Westerners and horrified us all,  Islamic terrorism is  fundamentally  an Arab problem, and more accurately,  an intramural problem within the world’s Islamic community   which should be dealt with as such.

* Sciolina, Elaine , “Naming of Hijackers as Saudis May Further Erode Ties to U.S.”,  N.Y.Times, Oct. 25, 2001.

The Solution :  “REVERSE  JIHAD” *

The solution ?  Get the word to Bush to muster instantly  all American allies in NATO and elsewhere and , in a coalition  with them,   call for an Arab/Islamic Summit – a joint summit to which essentially two internally-aligned coalitions are party – with one (The coalition of Islamic Arab nations) hosting, and the other (“Western Coalition”) being invitees.  Accordingly, the Arabs would invite the U.S. and its current corps of allies to attend  the Summit as such – friends and allies in the as-yet undeclared war (Jihad)  for Islamic unity , purification and security. The Summit should be called “Arab/Islamic” in lieu of “Arab/Western” or “Arab/Allied” or “Arab/(Any)other”  to emphasize and memorialize the fact that the Summit’s purpose is to address and solve what is essentially an Arab/Islamic problem, i.e., the problem of ending pseudo-Islamic-Jihad terrorism.

The diplomatic agenda proposed for the Summit by the Western  to the Arab Coalition  would be to give the  Arab coalition its choice, viz. (1) the alternative of having  the U.S. and allied nations carry forward, as outsiders   the ongoing  “war on terrorism” as forecast by Bush,  in the course of which  those armed forces would enter Afghanistan and other Arab nations where terrorists reside  in order to eliminate them with military force and other means,  or (2)  to have the U.S. and its allies  hold   invasive plans indefinitely  in abeyance  while the united coalition of Arab nations declares and wages (with the assistance of the U.S. and its allies) Holy War (Jihad) against the heretic terrorists who have falsely and criminally declared a Jihad against innocent peoples who are friends and allies of those united nations of Islam.

In the course of waging this United Reverse Jihad,  the Islamic authorities would  be nominally leaders,  and the secular (armed) forces of both the Arab nations and  Western Coalition would act as deputized Jihad warriors, such that any and all military operations would be in the nature of assisted internal affairs

or police actions (as opposed to invasive acts of limited warfare).   More importantly, all military operations would be cloaked in the legitimacy of an official Arab/Islamic campaign. Since , under Islamic law, no terrorists (except those condemned by fatwa)  could be attacked  (at least by any foreign power) until tried,  they would be subjected to military force only to the extent required  to obtain   their arrest and  confinement  pending their  Islamic trials.  It is to be doubted that many terrorists  would willingly surrender to be tried in a tribunal which would certainly be concluded by a guilty verdict and execution. The processes of their apprehension and arrest alone would reveal their identities, actions and whereabouts to their “infidel” Western predators.

For those  terrorists who are captured or who surrender themselves , it is suggested that no better outcome could be possible than having a so-called Islamic “Jihad warrior” arrested , tried and imprisoned by an Arab/Islamic tribunal, as perhaps the worst outcome would have been his martyrdom (viz., his being killed in the conduct of Jihad by “Western Infidels”).   It is  most likely  that any terrorists identified  and sought   under such a system of justice  would flee, resist arrest and die at the hands  of deputies in the course of search and arrest.  In  cases where the terrorist is well known or the evidence brought against him clear, a fatwa would be issued which amounts to a non-adjudicative condemnation in absentia  which would leave fright  and flight  the terrorist’s only options.

* “Reverse Jihad” is at once a noun phrase and a  (strategically) imperative sentence. 

  The immediate effect of the summit proposal (alternative #2) would be to force  each individual Arab state off the Middle-Eastern fence and require it to declare to the world its position on the purportedly autonomous terrorism being launched from inside its borders.  In a perhaps less Machiavellian  , but  similar fashion, the U.S. recently – and effectively – forced the Taliban to confirm its identity with Bin Laden by ordering it in essence to arrest and hurl him before the Western juggernaut.

It is likely that the other Arab states are somewhat less dysfunctionally co-dependent on their respective resident terrorists and will  recognize early-on that prolonging alliances with them will be their ultimate undoing . As the U.S. and Israel adjust their historic  embrace ,   with Palestine and Arab terrorism and détente at stake,  so will the Arab Sheiks and Clerics reassess their covert affairs with the terrorist elements in their Bedouin bailiwicks,   considering   the same stakes  from  opposite sides of the table.

The seeds and sentiment for this assault on Saudi  somnolence are  in the hawkish winds of Washington politics already as evidenced  by  recent declarations of  Senator Joesph R. Biden (Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) in which he said not only that Saudi Arabia  was “funding hatred”,  but that the United States has “gone overboard in its love affair with Saudi Arabia” , and more pointedly: “I know they’ve got a lot of oil, but they need us more than we need them.” *

The  Arabs’ “2^nd alternative” will require all Arab states willing to participate actively to identify, condemn and turn over Islamic terrorists within their borders and thus demonstrate , rather than merely declare  , their allegiances.

If the Arab Coalition elects to exercise the Jihad alternative (as is anticipated), the summit would go forward to deliberate on and design  the various tasks to be assigned to and performed , respectively , by the Arab Coalition and their western-deputy-Jihad warriors.  For obvious reasons, the Western Coalition should bargain for deputy power separate but equal to police authority delegated to their Arab military counterparts. The policing  powers delegated  to  officers of the Western Coalition  would be “cooperatively – but where  necessary – collaterally exercisable” , again for obvious reasons.

If Bush and Congress truly want to follow the English precedent and parlay traditional ties with Israel in our anxious quest for  more strategically-serviceable  national alliances ,  then let’s get some mileage out of  the inconstancy  with and for which Israel will certainly charge us ,  and win the war against pseudo-Islamic terrorism at the same time.

The first thing to do is to educate  and re-direct Bush in his current mission.  The name of the strategy is Fifth-Column Warfare  – inserting (or fostering )  a  warrior-contingent  within the camp of the enemy . The end purpose of the strategy is to instigate a reverse jihad by which Islam purges itself of its currently  pervasive brand of pseudo-Islamic jihad  terrorism .

The inducement is easy. First, bartering for an independent Palestine, however  efficacious and long- overdue, is probably not necessary.  But if it’s bound under Bush’s plan to be done, then “ ‘t wer  well it were done quickly”  – and as bargained-for consideration  for the alliances  we are seeking and desperately need. The pact to be negotiated in such alliances would be one of  contingent obligation on part of the

* Sciolina, Elaine , “Naming of Hijackers as Saudis May Further Erode Ties to U.S.”,  N.Y.Times, Oct. 25, 2001

United States – U.S.-sponsored/U.N. enacted and enforced statehood for Palestine – in exchange for and  only following a successful  condemnation  and purging by the Islamic Coalition states (with Western assistance) of its  pseudo-Islamic terrorists through a united execution  of the Coalition’s  Reverse Jihad (Holy War).

Moreover, the timing for such an alliance and pact could hardly be more propitious from the American standpoint, as our position as instigator  in the Palestinian concession would be diplomatically diluted  in  the mainstream and momentum  of the Allied Coalition actions.

Bush’s advance diplomats could  make it clear that one bargaining  chip on the  summit table would be  American endorsement of an independent Palestine.  The other chips would be ,  purely and simply the pieces of silver (oil currency and continuity) that sell out all covert terrorist allies and purchase their own (Arab) survival.

In the course of launching its call for a United Arab Reverse Jihad, the Western Coalition could make it clear that unless we get what we need and want from the Arab Countries convened at the summit, the terrorists could potentially have their way, in which case  OPEC, the U.S. and the world economy  at large are going en masse to hell in a hand basket. No more oil money.  No more  arab crown princes educated in Ivy league schools abroad. No more Mercedes.  No more harems with infinite supplies of unveiled virgins.  No more whathaveyou – and, of course, no independent  Palestine.  With what’s left of the American economy during its second depression, we’ll be able to fuel our mopeds and space heaters on home-grown oil.   Exit OPEC opulence. When oil sheiks are asked to dip into personal  tills to make their countries’ cash flow,  that  thought for them will prove unthinkable.

So, what do we ask in exchange for an  independent Palestine and keeping OPEC’s  and the world economies alive?  Nothing but what the Islamic nations should already have done and be doing now -  drafting a joint/collective fatwa against  bin Laden and all pseudo-Islamic terrorists .  They are infidels under Islamic law, and since they are murdering innocent civilians, they are , according to their Quer’an subject to having holy war (Jihad) declared against them. And the Arab sheiks and their clerical colleagues  in Islam will never be tendered a more attractive opportunity to get rid of the perilous parasites inside their tents – and oil fields. While appearing  in command of the infidels temporarily in their midst upon holy turf,  the authorities of Islam can use Western war machines and technicians superior to those of the terrorists  to physically exterminate at once  the pests of  Allah ,  Ellohim,  and Jehova .

The minute the legitimate clerical authorities of all major nations of Islam issue a fatwa (and only the highest authorities in Islamic countries can issue a legitimate fatwa) and declare truly-Islamic  Jihad against Bin Laden and his terrorist entourage  as infidels,  the tale of his terrorist reign  is in denouement . He and his “Al  Qaeda” (base) and the entire terrorist net will have forfeited altogether  their feigned authenticity.   Every mosque will now be chanting out the truth of bin Laden’s treachery and he will become pariah. He will become prey.

Looking Forward to Ultimate  Solutions

The Islamic denizens  of Arab countries will know where to look for Bin Laden and his lot – they (or their cousins and friends) are currently  harboring  and shielding him – in the name and cause of Allah.  But when the “true” leaders and clerics of Islam , who control Islamic mosques and media, unite in condemning Bin Laden as a phony and  Infidel, and issue an official  Fatwa against him, suicide will become  his most expedient option. He will have no place to hide. We wouldn’t have to bomb villages or Bedouin camps in hopes of a serendipitous kill.  We would assist the Arab authorities as we assisted Afghanistan in its successful war with Russia;  except this time we will openly participate – as deputies.  Whenever the “human intelligence” provided by the Arabs uncovers a terrorist target against which the Arabs are reluctant to move, we “Western Deputies of Jihad” would  be there prepared to obtain closure.

But our conduct of the war would be diplomatically characterized “allied advisement and assistance”  only, and not labeled “alien intrusion.”  This way, if innocent Islamics become  victim to  friendly fire, whoever fires the shot or missile – whether  it be Islamic Jihad warrior  or  American deputy -  is forgiven when the projectile inevitably  goes astray.  The unintended killing of innocents is exempt from sanction under Islamic rules of waging Jihad.

Procedure and Precedent

Getting the Arabs to meet in summit and commit to launching their own strategic and holy war against their own worst enemy is as logical as it is expedient – for all concerned .  If holy and supreme Islamic clerics can issue a kill-on-sight edict to all faithful Muslims for the elimination of one innocuous writer for misconstruing   a few chapters of Islamic history,   there is  ample precedent for drawing a fatwa for a band of infidels who are not only perverting Islamic law and history but flagrantly counterfeiting official  fatwas and declarations of  false holy wars and murdering  innocents, including Muslims, in the process.   The  publishing of false  “Satanic Verses”  is nothing compared to the killing of innocents falsely in the  name of Allah, but  the condemnation of its author by official Fatwa of Islam affords us recent, relevant  and persuasive  precedent.

As for the theological basis for the proposed summit declaration of Jihad by  a coalition of  Islamic countries , we have for further precedent and authority the recent pronouncement of Iran’s highest Islamic Leader, who was quoted by his Country’s  Deputy Foreign Minister in a recent (October 2) speech before the United Nations as  having  said in regard to middle-eastern – based terrorism :  “The war against terrorism is tantamount to …Jihad”.  On the authority of that pronouncement, one could argue Deputy Bush is already waging jihad in Afghanistan.

Once Jihad is declared by  a coalition of Islamic nations, our war to eradicate terrorism could easily be over for the most part  at that very moment – and without the spilling of a drop of American or Muslim blood.   By virtue of official Jihad being declared against him, Bin Laden and the rest are instantly and mortally  excommunicated from the religious body which is the source of their power.  Bin Laden and his lieutenants personally are simply demagogic power mongers of the fascistic order (nothing new) . But the foot soldiers (such as our recent twin tower bombers) are truly  zealous believers.  What will happen to their Islamic fervor when they  themselves become  objects of a true Islamic fatwa and  Jihad, and realize that a billion Muslims in a million mosques world-wide have sworn to seek them out and kill them on sight – unless perhaps they repent, go out, and sin no more. (Maybe the clerics of  the Muslim summit will anneal their fatwa  with an element of  Christian temperance.)

As for our increasingly  present danger of domestic terrorism, what could be more effective than Reverse Jihad to spiritually disarm the zealous enemies in our midst?  The principal strategies we are presently deploying are defensive, and as Senator Bob Graham most recently admonished – America must transform its paradigm from defensive to pro-active in regard to domestic terrorism..*

* Sen. Bob Graham (Chairman ,  Select Intelligence Committee),  in Oct 25, 01 address to U.S. Press Club,  “Future of Intelligence”

What we do abroad in the mountains and caves of Afghanistan will scarcely defend our populace from biological and other terrorist attacks within our borders.  What , besides the proposed universal Reverse Jihad, could we do to defuse more  effectively  these mad Muslim matches still secretly secluded  like suicidally-incendiary needles in the hapless haystacks of America?

But, as for those terrorists who continue their war to win Armageddon,  some form of active war would need be waged. And while it’s being waged, deploying  our troops and implements of war as “advisors” and lend-lease “back-up forces”, we can retain  some of our remaining troops to defend our own country against further terrorist attacks  over here.  The Western Coalition  can also pledge to assist the already war-ravaged countries with financial and other aid when reconstruction time comes, unlike  the Americans in their  exodus from Afghanistan that afforded a rallying post  for the Taliban and refuge for Bin Laden.

From the moment the Islamic Coalition’s  Fatwa against Bin Laden is published, he is not just a man without a country – he’s a Muslim without a mosque.  The youthful  and ignorant terrorists under his command will have their first occasion ever   to question whether in fact their martyrdom  will be rewarded in the next life with dark unclad virgins on red velvet sofas.  So much , one could venture,  for flight school enrollment in Bagdad.

The Arab nations will  have absolutely no excuse for rejecting the  Western call  for Jihad against Bin Laden and all Islamic terrorists.  The moment they declare it, they will have cleansed and clarified  their own positions in the world and in the eyes of Islam, which up until this point has been, according to Bin Laden -  “You are either with Islam, or with the Western Infidels”.  The strongest weapon Bin Laden has is mythology – the same  weapon  that  buttressed   Hitler’s  Third  Reich – the “Big Lie”- in the case of Hitler, his so-called “Herrenvolk” .  Bin Laden’s Big Lie  is that his terrorist mission is Islamic jihad- that is, a matter of Islam versus the infidels.  Only Islam itself can give the lie to and abort  this incubating Muslim  mythology, and the way Islam can accomplish this  is by doing the opposite – by declaring Jihad against the ones falsely declaring  Jihad  against others – by the process of Reverse Jihad.

The declaration of a fatwa and  Reverse Jihad against Bin Laden and other self-proclaimed Muslim terrorists would instantly and cataclysmically  polarize and re-define the “we’s “ and  “they’s” of Islamic politics.    In tendering this proposal to the countries of the Middle East, all we need  to do is get them assembled  and spell it out.  It will be an offer they can’t refuse.

Practical Matters and Obstacles

Iran, Iraq (and yes -even Arafat’s PLO) should be asked to join the Coalition’s collective Jihad – or else go on record explaining their refusal.  At present a probable  majority of Arab leaders are taking delight  (to varying degrees) in  the misfortunes recently befalling America.  This attitude was  evident in the grotesque celebrations (perhaps falsely reported but certainly occurring) on the streets of Palestine on 9/11,  and  more recent pro-Bin Laden demonstrations in Pakistan.  Of course these expressions of anti-Western sentiment  speak as much about  petro/Israeli/Palestine politics as they do about  terrorism, but regardless of the animus’ etiology , its  expression and  contagion would be suppressed  (or extinguished)  at the core upon the promulgation of a United  and Universal Arab fatwa and Jihad against all Islamic terrorists.

Moreover, any Arab state unwilling to urge its clerics to launch the Fatwa and Jihad would run the risk of being ipso facto identified with the terrorists.  It would be safe to predict that ,  when Saudi Arabia  votes  affirmatively (which is likely) on the united Jihad , there would be an increased  likelihood that Kuwait and the balance of OPEC countries will follow in domino fashion, given the force of the first concession and the

abiding concern over Bush’s seminal caveat: (that) “Those who do not side with us against the terrorists”…

Middle Eastern experts and Islamic scholars will of course be quick and united in pointing out fallacies they think are readily apparent in Reverse Jihad, but under scrutiny, such fallacies will prove more apparent than actual.  Experts in Middle Eastern politics will argue that no terrorist policy could be uniformly imposed among the several Arab states because of  myriad  variances in each Kingdom or Emirate of power distributions between the clerical and secular leaderships.  Islamic scholars will contend that in most Islamic States,  Iran  perhaps most in particular,  secular leadership is primarily nominal,  the real power over Islamic masses residing in the  Clerical powers that be.  Accordingly,  Islamic pundits will contend that the age-old and perennially-bellicose diversity among the many clans and tribes within Islam , each with their  own version of Islam,  will  render a  united declaration of Jihad an extreme unlikelihood .

To these caveats there must be ready concessions.  Of course any clash between the clerical and secular leaders of an Islamic state will be destabilizing , as will any collaborative  probing or policing of internal terrorism. But is anyone still seriously contending that a culmination  of Desert Storm by an invasion of Bagdad would have created a dangerous void of leadership in Iraq?  It is obvious that President Bush is resolved  to carry through with the declared war on terrorism to any extent necessary to seek out and eliminate both terrorists and any Islamic regime aiding and abetting  them.  Afghanistan is the closest case in point.

In the process of seeking out and eliminating terrorists residing in Afghanistan,  where there was no assistance offered by that country’s  secular or Islamic leaderships , a chaotic destabilization was the natural result.  The  Western emissaries in their process of “selling” Reverse Jihad to  Arab heads of  (secular) state can point out that the chaos presently pervading  Afghanistan could have been averted by the Reverse Jihad remedy.  Had there in fact been any separation, either by identity or authority  among secular and clerical powers in Afghanistan, then  bin Laden’s Al Qaeda might have been made subject to arrest and prosecution  by Afghan authorities , with the help of Western Jihad Deputies, acting in the same capacity they have in support of the Islamic faction known as The  Northern Alliance.

When  an Islamic state is de-stabilized , the resulting chaos reveals how tenuously  ruling power is maintained  by the typical secular governing entity.  For example, even when the kings were strongest, contends  one Islamic commentator,  “Afghan loyalties were never with a country called ‘Afghanistan’ but with their own ethnic group, their own version of Islam, and the traditional leaders of their own local  clans and tribes, in that order.” *  It is suggested that other Islamic states differ from Afghanistan only in the rankings of those  elements within  their own  chaotic ruling polyarchies.

In the faces of all forecasters  of chaos, however,   propounders of Reverse Jihad need utter only one arguably unimpeachable arabian aphorism – “Never underestimate the power of  petroleum hegemony.” It’s not merely  the military  might  of the  Western  world that will ultimately unite Arabian kings and clerics, it’s the oil dollars that perpetually  sustain them both.   In the final  contesting  of  the Sheiks and their clerical co-rulers of Islam,  modern-day  Pharisees will subject them to inquisitions demanding to be told  which of them should be looked upon as  supreme, to which both will respond- -“render unto Allah the things that are Allah’s, and to the King the things that are his.”  In the cases of both  Kings and  clerics the   rendering referred to  will be the same–Islamic  kings and  clerics will ultimately find their survival in common–absolutely and irretrievably  linked to the renderings of the Western Oil Market and U.S. Dollars. Terrorism is now standing in the way  of that dollar and oil flow.  Reverse Jihad will provide the means of getting terrorism out of the way ; it will provide the means for survival.

*Michael Radu,  “Taliban Defeat Sets Up Struggle for Power”,  Global Beat Syndicate 11/23/01

In the process  of negotiating for the acceptance of Reverse Jihad,  there will be inevitable clashes between the kings and clerics in each Arab state. The kings have allied themselves with the terrorists through covert support and laissez-faire internal policies in order to pacify their economically suppressed and malcontent  Islamic  masses.  The clerics have allowed themselves to become allied with the terrorists based upon the enmity they share in common  regarding the Israeli-Allied Western Infidels in their Middle-Eastern Midsts.  The natural enmity between the Arabian Kings and Clerics is of course stabilized and perpetuated primarily by the presence of America and its ubiquitous availability as scapegoat and common-enemy. A  definitive clashing  between the Kings and Clerics of Islam is both  long overdue, and  , quite apart from  either the advent or imposition of Reverse Jihad ,  inevitable.   In that clashing, some destabilization will occur; some Kings may be dethroned. So what? How many Islamic rulers today are truly friends of the West? No Soviet (or Sino-) Buzzard is presently circling in a position to swoop down and snatch any MidEast  minion from the  oily talons of the western Eagle.

One thing remains axiomatic – without the intervention and interdiction  of Islam,  pseudo-Islamic terroisim of the bin Laden , Al Qaeda  order , will continue to flourish and be mythologized  and marshalled  from mosque to mosque, crusaded and carted  from cave to B52-bombarded cave.

If the secular leadership approached by the Western Coalition fails to enlist their resident Clerics in a Reverse Jihad effort to combat terrorism,  then clerics and kings alike will have to face the  possibility that the war on terrorism in their states will run the course it  has in Afghanistan, where all resident rulers,  secular and clerical are cast into  the flux and chaos of a major campaign of invasive war, waged by the infidel West.  When the clerics and kings come to view this as inevitable,  there is a distinct likelihood that  their common enmity of the West will convert  to a common alliance against  the  terrorists, that being the obvious least among an array of optional evils. Once this choice is made, the U.S. and its allies can proceed to  play Machiavellian mentors and allied enablers  in the process of imposing Reverse Jihad.

The strategy proposed is simple, obvious and compelling: Advance emissaries of the Western Coalition would show the kings and sheiks how  it is absolutely essential (in order to survive)  that they persuade their clerics   to endorse  Reverse Jihad (in order to survive) and in so doing to  persuade the latters’ Islamic followers  to help (in order to survive) execute Reverse Jihad or else face the fate of the Taliban fundamentalists in Afghanistan.  If  the  point is made clear , i.e. that their assent to and participation in the Reverse Jihad are  essential to their collective  survival,   the sheiks and clerics and their faithful followers will come to  perceive  the pseudo-Islamic terrorist as  their common enemy – at least the fly in their common (and vital) petroleum-based ointment.

Skeptics will say that nothing practical might come from such a summit – even if we get the Arabs to issue the fatwa and declare the Jihad.  It’s true -  A Jihad declared is not a Jihad waged, and the Arabs might just wind up doing another Bagdad two-step  around the consequences of their covenants.

Arabs are known for their diplomatic obtuseness and stealth,  but on that petard ,  any state pledging Jihad disingenuously may well find itself hoisted, as the   declaration of Jihad in  itself  may prove to be all America and its allies need to fortify and achieve  existing arsenals and aims.

In a worst-case scenario, the Arabs would declare but fail absolutely to wage any active Jihad against the terrorists within their borders.  In that case, pursuant to proviso’s bargained-for in the summit pact, Americans and allied forces would resume their multi-lateral war against the terrorists, but this time , hopefully from the inside -  with the deputized authority and  prior endorsement of  declared Islamic allies.

Can we really expect Arabs to enter the caves and either convert or kill Bin Laden?  Maybe not, but again, we shouldn’t underestimate the effect of  a  Jihad declaration  in Islam – a religious culture whose patriarchs and peons kneel hip to hip in ubiquitous mosques ,  where they  chant, pray and process  the edicts of Islam not once upon a weekend, but five times a day, 365 days a year.  In every “coalition”  Arab country,  an officially-published and regularly-preached Fatwa against their resident  Islamic terrorists will instantly make a fifth-column C.I.A. field office out of every mosque in the country.  All our military leaders agree  that the most crippling  deficiency in our readiness to wage war against the terrorists  is human intelligence-  i.e.  “insider intel”  on the activities and whereabouts of  the individual cells in bin Laden’s notorious “base”, and the elusive  net of   unnumbered and unknown terrorists acting  in concert, to varying degrees, in other countries.

The  power and long-range effect of  an  Islamic Cleric’s edict ordering  a billion Muslims in a million mosques throughout the Muslim world to do their duty as Muslims and report the doings and  whereabouts  of all  terrorists, including Bin Laden is incalculable .   With this information, the U.S. , leading NATO  and U.N.-backed multinational forces, all acting as “deputy Jihad warriors” will be able – and licensed – to do all that is necessary to execute the “ultimate solutions” to the terrorist problem.  If 5^th-Column   Iranian, Pakistani or Afghan informers  have no stomach for entering the caves themselves,  the training camps and hideouts of the terrorists will nonetheless be identified and targeted for  missile-wielding Western Deputies,  and the Muslim masks of the terrorists will have been removed by clerical edict in the name and for the cause of Allah – rather than for the mercenary interests of Infidel Western invaders.  Onward Muslim Soldiers.

Few Options

There’s no way the U.S. , as outsiders can come in and cure the terrorist  problem with carriers and smart bombs.  And we don’t have enough ground troops – or enough time – to clean the terrorists out of their mountain and desert caves and tents one at a time, in ten countries simultaneously.  Again, MISSION IMPOSSIBLE.  All we can  do with the presently-proposed (Bush/Powell) mode of attack is to pursue terrorists  permanently and at such a pace that we can hope they won’t find time to christen our replacement twin towers with eau d’Anthrax , or visit Disneyworld at Christmas with a suitcase of PLUTOnium.

No , the way to win the war against terrorism, is to first view it for what it is -  an insane religious aberration within the institutional walls and nations of Islam. It poses a manifold-greater threat to the Middle East than it does any outside nation on earth.  Witness  what they’ve already done in Afghanistan.  To Islamic terrorism  America has lost its thousands -  Islam its tens  of thousands.

America can’t simply send the Marines over and clean this one up. This trash is in the back yards of Islam , and  Islam will have to help  clean up its  own back yards or pay the ultimate price.  We should, and under the proposed plan, will help.  We will furnish the brooms and the dust pans and even give lessons on their deployment and wielding.  But the Arabs have got to locate and help  carry out their own trash this time or else say goodbye to everything they’ve built  in the past hundred years.  They’ve all been over there  chanting that Bin Laden and all Muslim  terrorists are  criminal and in effect heretics within Islam.  They’ve all , save Saudi Arabia cautioned that they will neither ask for nor condone the basing  of essentially unilateral American forces in their midst for the purpose of locating and eradicating the Muslim terrorists.   They have  as much as said that Muslim  terrorism is a matter for internal Muslim resolution.  Why not – actively – take the Muslim world at its word?

Finally:  As for the  Solution of “Immediate” Problem . . .

How do we get this message to Bush and Powell?

B.E.A. /rrs 11/25/01

ADDENDUM

(In View of Complexity and Developments)

There was an adjective phrase used by a  writer pen-named “Trevanian” in a book  titled  “Shibumi” . The writer  was stretching for a way to express the  complexity that arose from some spy/assassin’s covert behavior which  challenged his comprehension to the extent  he coined it a “(matter of)  involute obliquity”.  When we  consider America’s situation and predicament–having six to eight million Muslims inside its boundaries, all bundled up in our Bill of Rights; all the extremist Muslims within our borders trying to lead the other several millions  to either convert or kill  us;  our stubborn dependency on Middle Eastern oil;  our alliance with Israel; the covert alliances of  the sheiks and clerics of Islam with the  terrorists; the vying for control on  part of these same clerics, sheiks, kings and criminals; the perils inherent in attacking (martyrizing) the Jihad terrorists, and not attacking them (and being ourselves slaughtered),  we’ve certainly centered on  a problem of involute obliquity.

The present essay on Reverse Jihad does not attempt to  treat , or even  outline, all the  problems which would become integral  to any plan to execute Reverse Jihad.  Of course there are  Middle Eastern Countries  which might not be willing to  participate. Their willingness to participate would of course be  directly determined by and proportioned to the  diplomatic prowess we manage to muster  in the  process of their induction.

There are probably countries whose Islamic leaders may refuse to become involved in the machinations of a  combined  Islamic/secular coalition.  There are some nations in the free world  which might refuse to participate for reasons which at this point  are unforseeable.

Three  things, notwithstanding, should be kept in mind when reading and evaluating  this  essay . First ,  Reverse Jihad  is a policy proposal which is propounded as a dynamic and evolving work in progress .  Second , as an evolving and circumstantially adaptable policy, Reverse Jihad doesn’t have to supplant any on-going foreign or domestic offensive or defensive policy at any time  – unless or until , according to the progression of events,  it (Reverse Jihad)  becomes an effective policy in practice.  Third,  unlike attempting military solutions of any kind,  attempting Reverse Jihad should cause no harm.  If it  fails totally to achieve the elimination of Islamic terrorism globally,  it would be a failure in diplomacy alone and still serve to varying degrees (of success ) militarily  to identify our enemies  and unify our  allies, (secular, clerical, national , individual and corporate) , and   that problem (identification)  is at the heart of  international terrorism.   Reverse Jihad could in fact turn the war of Islamic Terrorism in upon itself – into  the involutely oblique heart and land  of Islam.

B.E.A. / rrs  11/25/01

Reverse Jihad—2004 Addendum:

QUESTION:  You’ve just replaced George W. Bush as president. (Don’t ask how.) What do you do about Iraq, and why? Don’t look back; look forward. Be specific….

ANSWER: I would declare and host an international summit to “Reverse Jihad”.

To the summit I would invite the head clerics and secular leaders of every Islamic country on the planet.   When the meeting was called to order I would get down upon my knees before the entire assembly and say: “In the name of Allah, God, Jehova, Elohim, Jesus and Mohammed  and the unmentioned gods and prophets of all  here assembled, I apologize on behalf of myself and my country and its allies for having  wrongfully and mistakenly invaded Iraq.  I beg your forgiveness for our errors and for the lives lost and suffering incurred by this ill-conceived campaign of war, and I enlist your assistance in helping me make amends, and helping restore peace and prosperity to the people of Iraq. To accomplish this, I propose as follows.”

A sketch of the plan I would propose and implement  would include:

(1) I would let all of Islam know that if their clerical leaders will immediately begin to pronounce and preach in the mosques a jihad against all (false and by Islamic law illegal)  anti-western anti-coalition jihads and prevail in an  effort to mandate a cessation of all terrorist activities directed against Americans, Isreal and their allies (including the Sheiks of Saudi Arabia), that I would instruct Sharon that America’s alliance with the State of Israel would end unless there was an immediate and permanent withdrawl on Israel’s part of the occupied territories of Gaza and the West Bank and the establishment of a truly-multilateral commission for the establishment of an Independent Palestine devoid entirely of the influence of either Sharon or Arafat.

I would do all possible to expedite the establishment of  an independent Palestinian state as a proactive show of American good faith, regardless of the instant success of the Reverse Jihad effort. The independence of Palestine—and the complicity of the U.S. in delaying it, are, respectively  long overdue and obvious.

I would propose the adoption of a definition of “terrorism” and an enactment of an international law proscribing it and warranting international sanctions against it (and any nation’s aiding and abetting it), and I would (by fiat, because a consensus among the invitees would be impossible)  define it as “any unprovoked attack resulting in murder, mahem, or abduction upon any non-millitary personnel except where the non-military personnel are clearly and voluntarily participating in military, paramilitary or otherwise criminal  conduct directly against either the attacker or non-militant civilians under the protection of the attacker”.

I would require that all Islamic clerical authorities arrange it so that

U.N. or agents of other internationally independent observers are allowed to attend services in all Islamic mosques  and madrasses to determine whether the correct “jihad” sermons and cirriculum are being preached and taught , and to see to it that the mosques and maddrasses are no longer preaching and instructing anti-western Jihad messages or honoring anti-Western suicide jihaddists as Islamic martyrs.

I would demand Dick Cheney’s resignation for his conflict of interest (and/or treasonous misprison of office) in being VP and a paid profiteer (by way of “extended salary” and stock options )  of Halliburton; Next I would nationalize Halliburton and all its subsidiaries, declare by executive order a stock split vesting one-half the ownership of Halliburton in an Iraqi holding company which would issue a share of preferred stock (with compulsory distribution of one-half the annual corporate profits)  to each Iraqi when and as they register to vote in the election to popularly elect a new democratic regime in Iraq. All the oil fields, refineries, pipelines  and reserves—the entire oil infrastructure—would be managed and held in trust by Haliburton, audited by a team of Swiss bankers, over-seen by U.N. CPA’s, with one-half the net profits being allocated to defray the costs of re-construction of Iraqi civil and governmental infrastructure, and one-half being paid to Iraqi voters to render Iraq the  first Arab state in which the Islamic citizenry at large is allowed to benefit directly from the country’s only valuable natural resource.

I would muster the Republican Guard back into active duty as “Reverse Jihad Deputies” and station them in a single, strategically-located town of predominantly Sunni population; the town should not be near any oil or pipeline infrastructure. The Guard should be mustered at double their previous pay,and assigned primarily to

anti-insurgency (and anti-terrorist) duty, because that is what they

have been trained to do for the past 20 years. They should be hired only on the condition they muster back into service carrying their previous arms, including culvert explosives and rocket launchers. No weapon(s), no job. No job, no salary.  Bonuses for coming to work with explosives of massive destruction,  rocket launchers and anti-aircraft munitions.

The weapons we would thereby enlist into the Reverse Jihad militia would be  the same weapons currently blowing our un-armored Hummers to bits.

I would insist that the oil trust continue for a period of up to ten years, during which time I would publicly announce the Federal funding and implementing  of a Detroit/Manhattan project, where the American auto and HVAC industries were incentived (through tax benefits to manufacturers and consumers) to design, develop and purchase energy-efficient vehicles and residential and commercial heating and air conditioning technologies to totally terminate U.S. reliance on Middle Easter Oil by the end of the ten-year period of Reverse Jihad Détente. It could be accomplished in half that time with already-extant technologies.

The attack of 9/11 on the Twin Towers of New York was not about Saddam Hussein or the Baath Party’s oppression of Iraq’s Shiite majority.  The attack of 9/11 had to do with America’s alliance with Israel in its Zionist war with the Arabian Pennisula and American’s alliance with the Shieks of Saudi Arabia and other OPEC states. The attack on Iraq had nothing to do with the attack of 9/11, and served only to fulfill the prophesies of bin Laden and the other fundamentalist Islamics who look about themselves in the land others refer to as the latters’ “promised land” and see only the automobiles, condos, harems and castles of rich sheiks and their western partners who together mine and market their sacred holy land’s only supply of virtual milk and honey…Arabian crude.  To the average Saudi,  Israel is an American military ally, and the House of Saud, an American puppet regime. They believe this is so because it’s so.  Until the wealth of the Middle East is shared with its largely destitude and desperate Islamic inhabitants, those who are allowed inside to reap that wealth will be viewed as “infidel” and pariah from the windows of the ubiquitous mosques. 

No nation will ever successfully colonize an Islamic state. Not even Israel herself. We need to retreat from the Middle East as if our very lives depended on on, because they do. The only way to retreat from the Middle East and survive is for America to liberate itself from its dependance on Arabian oil.  This task is emminently dooable. But it will take imagination, leadership, courage and initiative we can presently only dream of, because at the helm of our present ship of state, there is a cretinous oil pirate cum neo-Con Christian zealot who truly thinks he’s waging—and winning (!) an illusory war with terrorism against some imagined axis of Revealationesque evil.  In fact, before Bush, terrorism posed only an ever-present danger of isolated and uncoordinated disaster.  After Bush’s declaration of war, and the preemptive conquest and colonization of two Islamic nations in the illusory “war” on terrorism, he has activated/consummated the  perenially-inchoate conflict between the West and Islam and managed to merge the interests of previously-isolated malcontents into the heart, soul and spleen  of  Islam. Bush’s brash and unilateral war policies have served to ordain the wildest of pan-arabian terrorist prophesies and characteriazations of America as “infidel” and “warring crusader”.

I would turn the Summit ultimately into a Constitutional Congress and permit the secular authorities and clerics of each sect to appoint delegates in numbers proportioned to the best available census calculations of Sunni/Shiite/etc. populations in Iraq.  After the adoption of a Constitution, the mechanics of an election process would be determined.

As “power pointed” dipolmacy, any resistence to any proposals I’d (as president)  make as hereinabove outlined would be met with the pat PAX-American PNAC pronouncement that is today’s state of affairs… “Well, all I can say to you Shieks, and you Clerics, and all your dissatisfied constituencies, whether civil or  terroristic is…Unless you reverse this Jihad against America, Israel and your Saudi citizenry and the oil pipelines we cherish and depend upon in common,  we highly-militarized Coaliationists are here to stay….It’s your call.”

Respectfully submitted by Robert R. (Dusty) Schoch, B.E.A. June 19, 2004.

The B.E.A. (“Barristers et al”) is a N.C.-based foreign policy think tank. We are a voluntary and charitably-constituted and oriented assembly of a-political attorneys, physicians, teachers, writers, military personnel and lay members who collaborate to develop and disseminate (for the most part on the internet) peace-oriented foreign policy alternatives.  I serve as the group’s “scribe”  and work as liaison where the B.E.A. elects to communicate with other think tanks and policy institutes.